Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Lack Of Trees In Irish And British Countrysides
Someone else wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008 12:17:17 -0400, "J. Clarke" wrote: Hal Ó Mearadhaigh. wrote: Hal Ó Mearadhaigh. wrote: Someone else wrote: On Fri, 09 May 2008 22:35:45 +0000 (GMT), jl wrote: In article , Hal Ó Mearadhaigh. wrote: Someone else wrote: On Thu, 8 May 2008 16:57:04 +1000, "FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote: For those who think that Ireland never had significant forest cover please see: www.lhi.org.uk/docs/History_Project_1.pdf "The first wave of colonisation was by birch, aspen and sallow. About 8 500 BC. pine and hazel spread northwards, replacing the birch, which became uncommon. The pine colonisation was followed by a wave of oak and alder. Lime and elm followed this, then holly, ash, beech, hornbeam and maple." Ireland's population grew to around 8 million. But that had little to do with the state of the forests. Disease and over harvesting of trees were the main causes of the deforestation. Who was it that was responsible for that overharvesting? NOT the British, who always had plenty of forests of their own, but also imported any woods for ship building mostly from Scandinavia. As Ireland had no coal, the needs of 8 million people for charcoal and cooking woulkd certainly damage the forests. Peat was available of course - but only after the forests had made room for it. No, it was always available... Peat bogs? of course. But they were also forested. If local attitudes to trees were the same then as now, it is surprising that any trees survived at all. "That tree will knock that wall down - cut it down". I've heard that sentence so often, it makes me sick. Manufacturing, farming, and the monies being made out of harvesting the peat bogs were main causes. (Alas Bord Na Mona, so much for greed). Blaming the British, (English) is merely being paranoid and specious. Not if it actually was the British that cut down the Irish forests to build the fleet that fought the Spanish Armada. Nonsense! : See http://fubini.swarthmore.edu/~ENVS2/...restation.html Which, among other things, says "The deforestation effects of increased shipbuilding was most visible in the change of Great Britain’s landscape during the fifteenth to eighteenth centuries. Those who traveled across Ireland at this time reported that one could ride all day and not see a single tree, an image that contrasts sharply with the carpet of trees that covered the area only centuries before (Brown, Terry)." So I guess your own source is spouting "nonsense". Reread what you've just posted. What do you think I'm going to find there? http://www.russellmcmurtrey.com/ "Ireland used to be covered with a lot of oak forest until the peak British armada years where much of it was cut down for making ships." and, interestingly, http://www.millersville.edu/~columbus/papers/nucci.html "The Queen gave Ralegh a massive estate in Ireland. He later plundered this Irish land for its forests in order to finance one of his expeditions." So? If the estates were his, then he had every right to do as he pleased. Only in the sense of a 'Conqueror's right'...of course stolen property remains stolen property even if it was taken as the spoils of war and in no way guarantees that that property will remain in their control.... Estates were given to him by the Queen. I'm sorry, but Raleigh didn't "conquer" them. If you have a problem it's with the Queen, not with Raleigh. In any case, how many ships? No idea. Possibly two at most? How can you make that claim? What evidence do you have? Not a lot of Oak involved in that.Why do you isist on being such a begrudger against the English? I begrudge them their invasion and occupation of Ireland. It has stunted Ireland's development as a sovereign nation for centuries...happily this is finally coming to an end... You're the one turning "British" into "English". People quibble about that...it is true though that at 1588 it was only England and not Britain that was doing the fighting. What does 1588 have to do with anything? After all, without England, Ireland would not have progressed past the Iron age. Ireland has Technology, smelting iron, using wood for that? Of course...Celts were the first western Europeans to have damascene steel... The largest industry in Wicklow for many a long year was Forestry. Nothing to do with the English. I'm not disagreeing but I'm interested in your justification for that claim. So what did they do with the wood? "He exploited the natural resources of Irish forestry to fund his expedition and targeted religious dissidents for settlement in English outposts." Your source? http://www.millersville.edu/~columbus/papers/nucci.html Bibliography 1. Lacey, Robert, Sir Walter Ralegh, Atheneum, New York, 1974 2. Pollard, A.F., The Political History of England, Greenwood Press Publishers, New York,1969 3. Rodriguez-Salgado, M.J., England, Spain and The Gran Armada, Barnes and Nobel Books,Savage Maryland, 1990 4. http://www.devon-cc.gov.uk/tourism/p...y/raleigh.html Sir Walter Raleigh, of Hayes Barton 5. Sale, Kirkpatrick, The Conquest of Paradise, First Plume Printing, New York, 1990 Britain had more than enough forests of her own to build all the ships she wished!! Maybe so / maybe not but the ruling class of Britain still cut down the trees of Ireland. Bullshit. Over simplification and merely your own unsupported opinion. See: http://fubini.swarthmore.edu/~ENVS2/...restation.html Which supports his view, not yours. Right. As far as I'm aware Britain got most of it's marine supplies from the Baltic countries What? There were substantial Oak forests in Latvia? For the ships that fought the Spanish Armada? Wouldn't it have been easier and cheaper to have felled the trees in nearby Ireland? - that trade certainly is mentioned quite frequently in various history books. Which ones precisely? Maybe you should use Google Nik, everyone else seems to! ROTFL You really should read your own sources in their entirety before using them to refute the statements of others. Like I've said, on a number of occasions, Merrick is an idiot who has no compunction when it comes to ignoring basic logical truths, sad but true. Nik ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- -- -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Late Blight -- Irish Potato Famine Fungus -- Attacks U.S. Northeast Gardens And Farms Hard | Gardening | |||
Some of best tools came from Smith and Hawken Irish digging spade ****** | Gardening | |||
Lack Of Trees In Irish And British Countrysides | Gardening | |||
Irish Peat | United Kingdom | |||
Irish moss | Gardening |