Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old 26-04-2003, 01:26 PM
P van Rijckevorsel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Complementarity or contrariness

Sun, 17 Nov 2002 18:40:08 GMT P van Rijckevorsel wrote:
Likely it had something to do with cell walls. Plants were defined as

having cell walls and usually having chloroplasts, while animals only had
membranes and rarely (if ever) had chloroplasts. Fungi don't have
chloroplasts but do have cell walls.
PvR

Archimedes Plutonium schreef
Question: these cell walls of plants are they carbon?


+ + +
Obviously so
+ + +

Question: these chloroplasts of plants-- do animals or bacteria have

some inverse or reverse entity?

+ + +
? ? ?
PvR




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Complementarity of plants to animals; Chloroplasts is complimented Archimedes Plutonium Plant Science 16 26-04-2003 01:26 PM
physics to refine Linnaeus Classification Complementarity Archimedes Plutonium Plant Science 1 26-04-2003 01:26 PM
Complementarity or contrariness P van Rijckevorsel Plant Science 0 26-04-2003 01:26 PM
Complementarity of plants to animals; Chloroplasts is complimented by flagella Chris Garvey Plant Science 0 26-04-2003 01:26 PM
Complementarity of plant kingdom to animal kingdom Archimedes Plutonium Plant Science 0 26-04-2003 01:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017