Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Physics bifurcation of Plant versus Animal
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
This is going to be a long ongoing future thread. To give some of the history, it started in the late 1990s when I was trying to think ahead of the day when humans created a human that has carbonfibre skeleton system instead of the calcium based. Into that research I never really asked the question of whether it is possible or impossible but then in the late 1990s I suspected it was impossible. Mind you, difficult is different from impossibility. For I suspected that the lines between being a plant in the Plant Kingdom and being a animal in the Animal Kingdom of biology means there are several lines of impossibility of having plant traits for an animal and vice versa. The skeleton of plants is carbon based but in animals is calcium based. One of the reasons I suspect impossible is because motion is key to being an animal and that to link a skeleton with motion requires body-electricity and that carbon cannot handle electric flow in body for motion that calcium can handle. So in the late 1990s I have been putting together other INVERSE relationships between animals and plants besides the inverse relationship of carbon for plant skeleton and calcium for animal skeleton. The Inverse relationship that animal waste and body are plant food and plants give animals food. The relationship of oxygen vital to animals yet nitrogen for plants. The relationship of oxygen expell from plants and carbon dioxide intake and vice versa for animals. Perhaps there is another relationship that I neglected to explore and that of Photosynthesis and chlorophyll to what in animals? Can we say that the nourishment of animals is hemoglobin and that hemoglobin is the inverse of photosynthesis for plants? One of the clear distinctions between Physics and Biology is that there seems to be sharp lines and clear lines in physics but not in biology where the moment you pen some law of biology and before the ink drys someone is talking about exceptions to your latest law or rule. Not to say that these lines or laws or rules do not exist but that it is much more difficult to find these lines in biology even though it is murky physics. That is what I believe all of biology is. That biology is a harder physics but a total physics and that someday in the future biology will have been so subsumed by physics just as chemistry was subsumed by physics in the 20th century. And I believe the subsummation of biology under physics will have these quantum-duals or inverses. And I am confident that when it is over with that the Linneaus classification of plantkingdom and animalkingdom will have been strenghtened. If we can say to some degree that Photosynthesis in plant kingdom is the inverse of hemoglobin mechanism in animal kingdom, then the interesting question with Leghemoglobin of plants such as locust trees, seems to come pretty close to being outright hemoglobin. So if plants can someday in the future actually have biotech engineered to have hemoglobin flowing into their roots, trunck and stems then that would be proof that the animal and plant kingdom are never fundamentally separated with Quantum Lines of impossibility. And that some far future date we can expect to have a human body whose skeleton is carbonfibre. Let us start from the top and go down. The *top-line* so to speak, and and getting tired of hearing people on TVnews saying "... bottom line". Do us a favor and start by saying "top-line is.... :-) There is a top-line logic however. We start with the reasonable premiss that all of biology is inside of Physics. Not only is chemistry subsumed by physics but that biology is subsumed by physics. In the BigBang theory that needs proof, but in the AtomTotality theory that is a certainty. So, if biology is a subset of Physics must therefore mean that biology has bifurcations just as physics has bifurcation of *particle to wave*. Or bifurcations of *momentum to position and energy to time* etc etc Top-line logic asserts the bifurcation of biology with dualisms must exist. Now, whether those bifurcations are straightforward such as the Linneaus classification and that Plant Kingdom is one such bifurcation and Animal Kingdom another such bifurcation (analogous to say momentum versus position) is an open question. It maybe that the bifurcation includes some bacteria along with plants and perhaps viruses. It maybe that when biology evinces the bifurcation that the Linneaus classification scheme is totally useless like the Thales classification of physics as fire, water, air, etc. So, if we take this top-line logic we immediately sense that a Quantum Physics classification scheme with duals must exist in biology and that the Linneaus classification must either be revised immensely or by luck that the Linneaus classification got the broad strokes of classification correctly. In my search for the Inverses in biology is merely a search for those Quantum duals of biology. If I can find the duals then I can find the Impossibilities of biology. Example: if calcium +electricity is dual to carbon + ??? then it is impossible for a human being to ever have a carbonfibre skeleton system, just as it is impossible to have both momentum and position to 100% accuracy. Most physicists and biologists believe that physics subsumes biology. And because they believe it, they would then have to agree that biology classification has quantum duals and lines of impossibilities running through biology. They would then also have to agree that a better classification than Linneaus exists and waiting to be unraveled. Archimedes Plutonium, whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Physics bifurcation of Plant versus Animal
When are you finally going to overdose on crack and do the world a favor,
Archie? Alternatively, why don't you leap off a long pier and join all your little friends evolving at the bottom of the sea? You are far beyond burnt out and delusional psychotic. Since you obviously refuse to take your meds, the men in white suits will be coming to take you away again!!!! Archimedes Plutonium wrote in message ... Archimedes Plutonium wrote: This is going to be a long ongoing future thread. To give some of the history, it started in the late 1990s when I was trying to think ahead of the day when humans created a human that has carbonfibre skeleton system instead of the calcium based. Into that research I never really asked the question of whether it is possible or impossible but then in the late 1990s I suspected it was impossible. Mind you, difficult is different from impossibility. For I suspected that the lines between being a plant in the Plant Kingdom and being a animal in the Animal Kingdom of biology means there are several lines of impossibility of having plant traits for an animal and vice versa. The skeleton of plants is carbon based but in animals is calcium based. One of the reasons I suspect impossible is because motion is key to being an animal and that to link a skeleton with motion requires body-electricity and that carbon cannot handle electric flow in body for motion that calcium can handle. So in the late 1990s I have been putting together other INVERSE relationships between animals and plants besides the inverse relationship of carbon for plant skeleton and calcium for animal skeleton. The Inverse relationship that animal waste and body are plant food and plants give animals food. The relationship of oxygen vital to animals yet nitrogen for plants. The relationship of oxygen expell from plants and carbon dioxide intake and vice versa for animals. Perhaps there is another relationship that I neglected to explore and that of Photosynthesis and chlorophyll to what in animals? Can we say that the nourishment of animals is hemoglobin and that hemoglobin is the inverse of photosynthesis for plants? One of the clear distinctions between Physics and Biology is that there seems to be sharp lines and clear lines in physics but not in biology where the moment you pen some law of biology and before the ink drys someone is talking about exceptions to your latest law or rule. Not to say that these lines or laws or rules do not exist but that it is much more difficult to find these lines in biology even though it is murky physics. That is what I believe all of biology is. That biology is a harder physics but a total physics and that someday in the future biology will have been so subsumed by physics just as chemistry was subsumed by physics in the 20th century. And I believe the subsummation of biology under physics will have these quantum-duals or inverses. And I am confident that when it is over with that the Linneaus classification of plantkingdom and animalkingdom will have been strenghtened. If we can say to some degree that Photosynthesis in plant kingdom is the inverse of hemoglobin mechanism in animal kingdom, then the interesting question with Leghemoglobin of plants such as locust trees, seems to come pretty close to being outright hemoglobin. So if plants can someday in the future actually have biotech engineered to have hemoglobin flowing into their roots, trunck and stems then that would be proof that the animal and plant kingdom are never fundamentally separated with Quantum Lines of impossibility. And that some far future date we can expect to have a human body whose skeleton is carbonfibre. Let us start from the top and go down. The *top-line* so to speak, and and getting tired of hearing people on TVnews saying "... bottom line". Do us a favor and start by saying "top-line is.... :-) There is a top-line logic however. We start with the reasonable premiss that all of biology is inside of Physics. Not only is chemistry subsumed by physics but that biology is subsumed by physics. In the BigBang theory that needs proof, but in the AtomTotality theory that is a certainty. So, if biology is a subset of Physics must therefore mean that biology has bifurcations just as physics has bifurcation of *particle to wave*. Or bifurcations of *momentum to position and energy to time* etc etc Top-line logic asserts the bifurcation of biology with dualisms must exist. Now, whether those bifurcations are straightforward such as the Linneaus classification and that Plant Kingdom is one such bifurcation and Animal Kingdom another such bifurcation (analogous to say momentum versus position) is an open question. It maybe that the bifurcation includes some bacteria along with plants and perhaps viruses. It maybe that when biology evinces the bifurcation that the Linneaus classification scheme is totally useless like the Thales classification of physics as fire, water, air, etc. So, if we take this top-line logic we immediately sense that a Quantum Physics classification scheme with duals must exist in biology and that the Linneaus classification must either be revised immensely or by luck that the Linneaus classification got the broad strokes of classification correctly. In my search for the Inverses in biology is merely a search for those Quantum duals of biology. If I can find the duals then I can find the Impossibilities of biology. Example: if calcium +electricity is dual to carbon + ??? then it is impossible for a human being to ever have a carbonfibre skeleton system, just as it is impossible to have both momentum and position to 100% accuracy. Most physicists and biologists believe that physics subsumes biology. And because they believe it, they would then have to agree that biology classification has quantum duals and lines of impossibilities running through biology. They would then also have to agree that a better classification than Linneaus exists and waiting to be unraveled. Archimedes Plutonium, whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Quantum Duality between Plant kingdom and Animal kingdom as macro duals | Plant Science | |||
Quantum Physics bifurcation of Plant versus Animal kingdoms in | Plant Science | |||
Quantum Physics bifurcation of Plant versus Animal kingdoms in biology Leghemoglobin | Plant Science | |||
Quantum Physics bifurcation of Plant versus Animal kingdoms in biology Leghemoglobin | Plant Science | |||
Quantum Physics bifurcation of Plant versus Animal kingdoms in biology Leghemoglobin | Plant Science |