Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
flaw in Darwin Evolution grafted rootstock
Archimedes Plutonium wrote in message ...
14 Jun 2004 07:48:46 -0700 Christopher Green wrote: (snipped) No, it may have a much greater viability with a "bird gut dependency". Seeds that require a pass through a digestive tract, or a fire, or a freeze and thaw are generally also well protected and will survive harsh conditions in dormancy. They will receive better dispersal or germinate under better conditions, and so will end up with a greater yield. -- Chris Green No, this is a flaw in Darwin Evolution theory. Your above is another example of "postdiction" of Darwin Evolution. This particular flaw is that of "generalist" versus "specialist" and that when a plant or animal becomes too specialist faces the quick road to extinction. If you look at the record of species gone extinct it is replete with specialists, seldom any generalist. That is merely silly. You know nothing of what you speak. -- Chris Green |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
whether grafted RockElm or rootstock SiberianElm and what roles theyplay | Plant Science | |||
Compounding replacing Darwin Evolution; NOVA show on tetrapods ofDevonian | Plant Science | |||
Compounding replacing Darwin Evolution; NOVA show on tetrapods of Devonian | Plant Science | |||
grafted rootstock | Plant Science | |||
(1) Layering and (2) seed dispersal [Was: grafted rootstock] | Plant Science |