LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old 27-03-2006, 03:04 AM posted to rec.ponds
Derek Broughton
 
Posts: n/a
Default To Compost or Not to Compost

Richard Sexton wrote:

I had a not very heavily populated 5000 gallon pond.
My deep lilies would, every year, develop sufficient foliage to lift the
tubers a foot or two off the bottom of the pond. We're talking about 18"
or longer tubers, with 100sq.ft. of pads, and dozens of blooms. If I
could have made them grow better with "food" I'd have to have been nuts to
do it!


Ok, so you think you're nuts, but the point still stands. With proper
feeding they'll do *better*.

Why would you want better? As I said to Ingrid - it's useful if you're
raising them to sell, but hobbyists just want to get the maximum number of
blooms, sufficient surface coverage and a minimum of removing and dividing.
Adding nutrients to a fish pond is not generally desirable.
--
derek
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To compost/mulch or not to compost/mulch Malcolm United Kingdom 15 03-05-2009 09:19 AM
Color not edible #2 - Color not edible.jpg (1/1) William Wagner[_2_] Garden Photos 0 30-06-2007 05:30 PM
NOT OT "Gardening or not gardening posts" Space United Kingdom 3 04-08-2006 06:20 AM
Not terribly impressed with glyphosate, but not a total waste of time ken cohen United Kingdom 2 29-08-2003 08:02 PM
sweet--not scotch broom--to plant or not to plant? Lil Gardening 2 28-05-2003 06:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017