Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Scaled-back Pond Plan?
I was going to install a pond of approx. 6' by 10' with a section that was
around 3' deep. I'm considering scaling that back to be just a so called "bird pond" that is around 3' by 4' feet and only 6" deep. I want the sights and sounds of moving water but not a lot of maintenance. I'm going to incorporate this into some new landscaping/hardscaping around the deck. My feedback request: - Can a keep a couple of fish in this size pond over the warm months? I know it would be too shallow to winter them here in the northeast. - Is this too small for a good ecosystem to "run" on its own and will actually require more attention than a larger pond? - Given that this would be my first pond, how likely is it that I'll want something larger once I get a taste of having a pond? - If I keep the surface area dimensions around 3' by 4' but go with more depth, could I keep a couple of fish in there over the winter? Thanks in advance. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What most of us have found over the years
is that bigger is more forgiving than smaller. And that if most of us had to do it over again we would have built a bigger pond. That said... You can take a long view of it and plan for two ponds. Build a small one and then turn it into a plant filter for a larger pond down the road. Take the planning into consideration. Goldfish are pretty tough and, being how you are in the NE they probably will do okay in the smaller pond. Especially if you plan on taking them inside for the winter. Just of few of them. Or you can try rosie red fathead minnows if they are available in your state. Ponds do well balancing if they have few fish to lots of water and lots of plants. And there are always seasons to the balancing act. Most of us deal with some kind of algae bloom in the spring until our lilies start to shade the water and all our marginal plants get going. Algae is very efficient at getting going early in the pond season . kathy :-) www.blogfromthebog.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
NW wrote:
I was going to install a pond of approx. 6' by 10' with a section that was around 3' deep. I'm considering scaling that back to be just a so called "bird pond" that is around 3' by 4' feet and only 6" deep. I want the sights and sounds of moving water but not a lot of maintenance. I'm going to incorporate this into some new landscaping/hardscaping around the deck. My feedback request: - Can a keep a couple of fish in this size pond over the warm months? I know it would be too shallow to winter them here in the northeast. Yes. Goldfish would do fine in that - but make sure there's plenty of shade (lotus would be nice). - Is this too small for a good ecosystem to "run" on its own and will actually require more attention than a larger pond? It might require more attention, because you can't afford to let the water level fluctuate much, but it's workable, and it needn't be much more work. - Given that this would be my first pond, how likely is it that I'll want something larger once I get a taste of having a pond? Given that it's your first pond, it's about 100% likely you'll want another one, soon. It doesn't really matter what size your first is - you always want something else. I went from a bathtub, to a 200 sq.ft. 5' deep pond, then to a bog (wet, but not submersed), etc... - If I keep the surface area dimensions around 3' by 4' but go with more depth, could I keep a couple of fish in there over the winter? Most likely. I know of people who've kept goldfish in 18" in Toronto. Depending whereabouts in the northeast, you shouldn't have a problem. -- derek |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
back from vacation and what I found back home | Orchids | |||
back from vacation and what I found back home | Orchids | |||
back from vacation and what I found back home | Orchids | |||
cutting back on cutting back | Gardening | |||
OT but funny: "God's Diet Plan" | Gardening |