LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #76   Report Post  
Old 06-09-2003, 12:02 AM
David Kendra
 
Posts: n/a
Default biotech & famine


"Mooshie peas" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 23:59:23 GMT, "David Kendra"
posted:


"Torsten Brinch" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 03:13:24 GMT, Mooshie peas
wrote:

On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 17:11:42 +0200, Torsten Brinch
posted:

On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:31:25 GMT, Mooshie peas
wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:30:04 +0200, Torsten Brinch
posted:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 02:37:06 GMT, Mooshie peas
wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 11:32:40 +0200, Torsten Brinch
posted:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 09:00:11 GMT, "Gordon Couger"
wrote:

GM seeds can be develop in a short time

Myth: Genetic engineering reduces development time.

[Fact:]
The actual plant breeding work in genetically modified
varieties is the same as for conventional varieties, but
before this breeding work can start, there is the need for
extensive molecular development.

It is generally more expensive to develop genetically
modified varieties and bring them to market than
conventional varieties, because of the additional research
and development work, and additional regulatory
requirements.

But this has little to do with speed -- your original claim.

Mwuahahahaha. Additional research and development work that
does not take additional time?

Not compared with the decades and even hundreds of years of

selective
breeding that you are comparing it too. Mwuahahahahah yourself!

Nyah nyah :-) Additional research and development work that does
not take additional time _?_

Are you having a strange turn?

No-one said that additional research and development doesn't take
extra time. snip

So you agree with Novartis, that genetically modified varieties
generally take more time to develop than conventionally bred
varieties, due to additional research and development work?


For field crops, it actually takes less time to introduce the triat since
there is often a have a very strong selectable marker associated with it.


Do you have an example of this, David? A trait that took less time by
conventional methods to introduce into a plant compared with by GM
methods? Everyone seems to be asserting this with no examples to back
it up.


sure...all disease resistance traits molecular markers has cut years off
the process


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Animals avoid GM food (Was: biotech & famine) Brian Sandle sci.agriculture 7 20-08-2003 04:02 AM
Animals avoid GM food (Was: biotech & famine) Brian Sandle sci.agriculture 0 17-08-2003 09:13 AM
40 Hour Famine May 16-18 CINDY CAMPBELL Australia 0 17-05-2003 03:56 AM
the great chilli famine of 2003 Dick Adams Australia 0 05-04-2003 06:32 AM
the great chilli famine of 2003 Chris Garvey Australia 3 05-04-2003 06:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017