| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Silver lining
Sounds great
What about salt content ?? Tom Atkinson "Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... ...to all those clouds, leaf-stripping gales and rough seas last week, is the fantastic free harvest lying on beaches here. It's a combination of tree leaves (washed down the burns to the sea) , fresh seaweed and shells, all pulverised and ground up by heavy seas into loose, friable black mulch. Best of all, it's been thrown right to the top of the beach in great windrows close to the road, ready to bag up and load in the car. It's almost the consistency of home-made compost. Today was superb, calm and very sunny, and now the garden beds are piled with black hills of mulch tipped from the sacks, ready for spreading. Janet |
Silver lining
"Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... Crofters on the west-Scotland coast, where soil is often very thin, traditionally planted potatoes on a mound of seaweed. The mounds were called lazybeds, must have been named by someone who had never done it :-) Potatoes grown with seaweed taste marvellous. Janet Do you still have to salt the water when boiling them? ;o) -- Regards, Alan Preserve wildlife - pickle a SQUIRREL to reply. |
Silver lining
The message
from Janet Baraclough contains these words: Crofters on the west-Scotland coast, where soil is often very thin, traditionally planted potatoes on a mound of seaweed. The mounds were called lazybeds, must have been named by someone who had never done it :-) Potatoes grown with seaweed taste marvellous. Ahem! Lazybeds were strips of soil with the areas beside them dug out to make a trench. The spoil from the trench was put on the bed. In successive years the beds would be fertilised by using the previous year's compost. This was traditionally started in the spring, when the byre was mucked-out and the thatch pulled off and replaced with new. To this was added loads of seaweed. Pics of the house I nearly bought on the Isle of Lewis, clearly showing the old pattern of lazybeds at: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/lewis/ and look at the line of thumbnail links 'The Croft and Crofthouse'. -- Rusty horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co full-stop uk |
Silver lining
The message
from "Alan Gabriel" contains these words: "Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... Crofters on the west-Scotland coast, where soil is often very thin, traditionally planted potatoes on a mound of seaweed. The mounds were called lazybeds, must have been named by someone who had never done it :-) Potatoes grown with seaweed taste marvellous. Janet Do you still have to salt the water when boiling them? ;o) I never salt the water anyway - the last box of Maldon Sea Salt I bought has lasted me nearly ten years. -- Rusty horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co full-stop uk http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/ |
Silver lining
In message , Jaques
d'Alltrades writes :-) Potatoes grown with seaweed taste marvellous. Janet Do you still have to salt the water when boiling them? ;o) I never salt the water anyway - the last box of Maldon Sea Salt I bought has lasted me nearly ten years. Ah - a man who knows the secret of a healthy life! -- Klara, Gatwick basin |
Silver lining
Do you still have to salt the water when boiling them? ;o) I never salt the water anyway - the last box of Maldon Sea Salt I bought has lasted me nearly ten years. Ah - a man who knows the secret of a healthy life! -- Klara, Gatwick basin and another one here :-)) Hardly any salt in anything and almost everything fat free. Plenty of fruit and fibre and trying to lose another half a stone before we go away. Mike The truth will prevail |
Silver lining
"Mike" wrote in message ... Do you still have to salt the water when boiling them? ;o) I never salt the water anyway - the last box of Maldon Sea Salt I bought has lasted me nearly ten years. Ah - a man who knows the secret of a healthy life! -- Klara, Gatwick basin and another one here :-)) Hardly any salt in anything and almost everything fat free. Plenty of fruit and fibre and trying to lose another half a stone before we go away. Mike The truth will prevail That's an amazing diet. Fat free - Do you mean low fat ? As for salt and other salts you are probably eating more than think. Plenty of fruits which contain much more fat than you think. Finally added fibre (bran) can be harmful to your ability to absorb certain vitamins. At this rate you could be dead and gone within the week. |
Silver lining
That's an amazing diet. Fat free - Do you mean low fat ? As low fat as possible. Very interesting statement on the front of some Yogurt pots "FAT FREE", then round the back in the section contents "FAT 01Gr" Now that to me is NOT Fat Free. Low Fat yes, or even very low fat :-)) As for salt and other salts you are probably eating more than think. Yes I agree there as well. Look at any packaging and there is aways salt in its content. What I mean is that I do not tip loads of salt on my food. Plenty of fruits which contain much more fat than you think. Finally added fibre (bran) can be harmful to your ability to absorb certain vitamins. At this rate you could be dead and gone within the week. Taking all of the last statements together some people may be pleased to see me dead within the week, but according to my doctor I won't be, at least by diet and how I was the last time he did a check up. I will take my doctors advice because according to him, it is 'In his own interest to keep me alive'. All I know is that I am going to have to say 'No' to a lot of the food whilst I am away :-(( Mike The truth will prevail |
Silver lining
"Mike" wrote in message ... That's an amazing diet. Fat free - Do you mean low fat ? As low fat as possible. Very interesting statement on the front of some Yogurt pots "FAT FREE", then round the back in the section contents "FAT 01Gr" Now that to me is NOT Fat Free. Low Fat yes, or even very low fat :-)) As for salt and other salts you are probably eating more than think. Yes I agree there as well. Look at any packaging and there is aways salt in its content. What I mean is that I do not tip loads of salt on my food. Plenty of fruits which contain much more fat than you think. Finally added fibre (bran) can be harmful to your ability to absorb certain vitamins. At this rate you could be dead and gone within the week. Taking all of the last statements together some people may be pleased to see me dead within the week, but according to my doctor I won't be, at least by diet and how I was the last time he did a check up. I will take my doctors advice because according to him, it is 'In his own interest to keep me alive'. All I know is that I am going to have to say 'No' to a lot of the food whilst I am away :-(( Mike The truth will prevail OK glad we agree. Whilst on this salt subject you may have noticed that a lot of products state the sodium content which you need to multiply by approx 2.5 to find out the actual salt content as sodium chloride. I've always wondered whether it's to much sodium anything that is bad for you or just sodium in the form of sodium chloride. Sodium citrate /bicarbonate/phosphate etc etc are all widely used in foodstuffs. |
Silver lining
OK glad we agree. Whilst on this salt subject you may have noticed that a lot of products state the sodium content which you need to multiply by approx 2.5 to find out the actual salt content as sodium chloride. I've always wondered whether it's to much sodium anything that is bad for you or just sodium in the form of sodium chloride. Sodium citrate /bicarbonate/phosphate etc etc are all widely used in foodstuffs. Chemical symbols and chemical names are not my cup of tea and are a forigan language. I thought Salt and Sodium were the same thing. Thanks for the info :-)) I 'thought' I understood chemical analysis and joining of chemical compounds when I was at Bath University, but no. Lost in space of time :-)) Mike The truth will prevail |
Silver lining
The message
from Klara contains these words: In message , Jaques d'Alltrades writes :-) Potatoes grown with seaweed taste marvellous. Janet Do you still have to salt the water when boiling them? ;o) I never salt the water anyway - the last box of Maldon Sea Salt I bought has lasted me nearly ten years. Ah - a man who knows the secret of a healthy life! Well, one of them. Sometimes I add a bit of salt if I find myself getting cramp during the night. -- Rusty horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co full-stop uk http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/ |
Silver lining
The message
from "Rupert" contains these words: "Mike" wrote in message ... Do you still have to salt the water when boiling them? ;o) I never salt the water anyway - the last box of Maldon Sea Salt I bought has lasted me nearly ten years. Ah - a man who knows the secret of a healthy life! and another one here :-)) Hardly any salt in anything and almost everything fat free. Plenty of fruit and fibre and trying to lose another half a stone before we go away. Mike The truth will prevail That's an amazing diet. Fat free - Do you mean low fat ? As for salt and other salts you are probably eating more than think. Plenty of fruits which contain much more fat than you think. Finally added fibre (bran) can be harmful to your ability to absorb certain vitamins. I use a fair amount of fat, and often have (say) a sausage, bacon, black pudding, white puding and fried leftover potato for breakfart (ToBAGO) I don't eat a lot of processed or manufactured food. That excludes bacon and black pudding, and I make my own white pudding and similar things. Avocados contain plenty of fat. And I avoid anything with 'added fibre' as I reckon I get enough - use wholemeal flour as much as possible, plenty of veg, etc. At this rate you could be dead and gone within the week. And I'm still invisible, viewed sideways... -- Rusty horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co full-stop uk http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/ |
Silver lining
Sacha wrote: Seaweed was the fertiliser of choice for farmers in Jersey growing Jersey Royals, time past. Some are returning to using it now, thank goodness. All they did was chuck it on and let weather and nature do the rest. cough Seaweeds are very effective absorbers of marine pollutants, and concerns over environmental pollution have considerable implications for the commercial harvesting of Scottish wild plants for food, fodder and medicinal purposes, as well as for mulches and fertilisers. There is some concern about the contamination of seaweeds on the West coast of Scotland (at least in the southern part of the country) with radioactive isotopes from the Sellafield power station. For example, several seaweed species act as bioaccumulators of heavy metals, and Fucus vesiculosus (bladder wrack) growing off Islay has been found to be contaminated with Technetium 99. As to the damage to the ecosystem, perhaps that's another conversation. Bon appetit :o) |
Silver lining
On 30/11/05 14:35, in article
, "La puce" wrote: Sacha wrote: Seaweed was the fertiliser of choice for farmers in Jersey growing Jersey Royals, time past. Some are returning to using it now, thank goodness. All they did was chuck it on and let weather and nature do the rest. cough Seaweeds are very effective absorbers of marine pollutants, and concerns over environmental pollution have considerable implications for the commercial harvesting of Scottish wild plants for food, fodder and medicinal purposes, as well as for mulches and fertilisers. There is some concern about the contamination of seaweeds on the West coast of Scotland (at least in the southern part of the country) with radioactive isotopes from the Sellafield power station. For example, several seaweed species act as bioaccumulators of heavy metals, and Fucus vesiculosus (bladder wrack) growing off Islay has been found to be contaminated with Technetium 99. As to the damage to the ecosystem, perhaps that's another conversation. Bon appetit :o) Oh dear, how depressing. And the CIs are pretty close to Cap de la Hague. On that theme, I went with a group to visit the Nuclear Fuel plant there and we were given a marvellous lunch. While we were commenting on how delicious the trout were, someone remarked in a gravelly voice "they were the size of goldfish this morning". It wasn't easy to explain that to our French hosts, under the circumstances! If, in terms of damage to the ecosystem you're thinking of harvesting the seaweed, as far as I know they way that's done now is simply to pick up what's been washed up by the autumn storms. I don't *think* anyone goes down at very low water to cut it as they did once. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove the weeds to email me) |
Silver lining
Sacha wrote: Oh dear, how depressing. Sorry. And the CIs are pretty close to Cap de la Hague. On that theme, I went with a group to visit the Nuclear Fuel plant there and we were given a marvellous lunch. While we were commenting on how delicious the trout were, someone remarked in a gravelly voice "they were the size of goldfish this morning". It wasn't easy to explain that to our French hosts, under the circumstances! :o) If, in terms of damage to the ecosystem you're thinking of harvesting the seaweed, as far as I know they way that's done now is simply to pick up what's been washed up by the autumn storms. I don't *think* anyone goes down at very low water to cut it as they did once. No. Farms are being created for this - in fact everywhere in Scotland. Big business now because of it's 'organic' attraction. Sadly Ascophyllum entensive harvesting in the Outer Hebrides show signs of recovery only after 6 years. The culture also is thought to have a significant effect on the ecosystems surrounding the farms, primarily because of the increased detritus, cover and surface area that the seaweeds provide when cultured en masse. The fact that many of the seaweed farms are in sheltered fjords and inlets also means that currents to remove the excess nutrients are weak, exacerbating the problem. In addition, some of the artefacts of plantation schemes (such as anchors for the growing nets) are slow to degrade and may remain in the cultivation areas for many years. But they're continually trying to redress the problem ... but as the demands increase. One just hopes one doesn't get too greedy with the situation indeed :o( |
Silver lining
"Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... The message . com from "La puce" contains these words: Sacha wrote: If, in terms of damage to the ecosystem you're thinking of harvesting the seaweed, as far as I know they way that's done now is simply to pick up what's been washed up by the autumn storms. I don't *think* anyone goes down at very low water to cut it as they did once. No. Farms are being created for this - in fact everywhere in Scotland. Garbage. Yet again, you've cribbed web information you haven't got the reading skills to comprehend, and hopelessly misrepresented what it says. Here's the site you garbled: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/cru/kd01/orange/sdsp-06.asp It says, quote: "The seaweed industry in Scotland has virtually collapsed in recent years. Nevertheless seaweed remains one of Scotland's most abundant plant resources, and has the potential to provide limited employment in coastal areas. " (endquote) Big business now because of it's 'organic' attraction. Rubbish. The website says its a shrinking industry of small and medium businesses (quote) (the seaweed industry in Scotland) "It is unlikely ever to recover its past stature, but there is considerable scope for the establishment of small or medium-sized enterprises producing fertilisers and animal feeds, as well as small-scale production of seaweed-based foods, medicines and cosmetic products." separate quote "This industry in Scotland is far smaller than it was in the heyday of potash and (subsequently) iodine production,32 and has recently suffered severe setbacks, but nevertheless seaweed remains one of Scotland's most significant wild plant resources. At present Scotland is a relatively minor producer of seaweed in comparison with other European countries, capturing only around 2% of the market" (end quote) Sadly Ascophyllum entensive harvesting in the Outer Hebrides show signs of recovery only after 6 years. The culture also is thought to have a significant effect on the ecosystems surrounding the farms, primarily because of the increased detritus, cover and surface area that the seaweeds provide when cultured en masse. The fact that many of the seaweed farms are in sheltered fjords and inlets also means that currents to remove the excess nutrients are weak, exacerbating the problem. In addition, some of the artefacts of plantation schemes (such as anchors for the growing nets) are slow to degrade and may remain in the cultivation areas for many years. That is absolutely outrageous plagiarism and misrepresentation. You lifted that material straight from a website and pass it off as something YOU wrote, or "know about". However, you also edited and garbled it to mean the opposite of what the author wrote. Here's just one example': Puce misconstrued version: " Sadly Ascophyllum entensive harvesting in the Outer Hebrides show signs of recovery only after 6 years." Here's what the author actually said; " Sustainable harvesting 4.25 The seaweed species that has undergone the most in-depth harvesting evaluations in the British Isles is Ascophylum nodosum. Tyler (1994) examined the effects of Ascophyllum harvesting in the Outer Hebrides. This limited study found almost complete recovery of the species and its associated ecosystem within five to six years. However, if Ascophyllum is cropped to approximately 20cm it should be harvestable again after 3 years. " The culture also is thought to have a significant effect on the ecosystems surrounding the farms, primarily because of the increased detritus, cover and surface area that the seaweeds provide when cultured en masse. The fact that many of the seaweed farms are in sheltered fjords and inlets also means that currents to remove the excess nutrients are weak, exacerbating the problem. In addition, some of the artefacts of plantation schemes (such as anchors for the growing nets) are slow to degrade and may remain in the cultivation areas for many years. You wrongly placed the above paragraph to look as if the author was listing negative effects of what you call "Ascophyllum entensive harvesting in the Outer Hebrides". He was not; you moved that paragraph from a different context in a different section To conclude, not only have you ignorantly misrepresented the facts of Scottish seaweed businesses, you have also grossly misquoted a website which you shamelessly plagiarised and did not even accredit as your source. Janet. Good work janet. -- Tumbleweed email replies not necessary but to contact use; tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com |
Silver lining
"La puce" wrote in message oups.com... cough Seaweeds are very effective absorbers of marine pollutants, and concerns over environmental pollution have considerable implications for the commercial harvesting of Scottish wild plants for food, fodder and medicinal purposes, as well as for mulches and fertilisers. There is some concern about the contamination of seaweeds on the West coast of Scotland (at least in the southern part of the country) with radioactive isotopes from the Sellafield power station. For example, several seaweed species act as bioaccumulators of heavy metals, and Fucus vesiculosus (bladder wrack) growing off Islay has been found to be contaminated with Technetium 99. As to the damage to the ecosystem, perhaps that's another conversation. Bon appetit :o) "Fucus" sums that up nicely, then! |
Silver lining
"La puce" wrote in message oups.com... Sacha wrote: Seaweed was the fertiliser of choice for farmers in Jersey growing Jersey Royals, time past. Some are returning to using it now, thank goodness. All they did was chuck it on and let weather and nature do the rest. cough Seaweeds are very effective absorbers of marine pollutants, and concerns over environmental pollution have considerable implications for the commercial harvesting of Scottish wild plants for food, fodder and medicinal purposes, as well as for mulches and fertilisers. There is some concern about the contamination of seaweeds on the West coast of Scotland (at least in the southern part of the country) with radioactive isotopes from the Sellafield power station. For example, several seaweed species act as bioaccumulators of heavy metals, and Fucus vesiculosus (bladder wrack) growing off Islay has been found to be contaminated with Technetium 99. As to the damage to the ecosystem, perhaps that's another conversation. Bon appetit :o) Technetium 99--Well according to this link you don't need to worry. I will leave it to JB to administer yet more punishment. http://www.food.gov.uk/science/surve...io/radsurv2004 |
Silver lining
Janet Baraclough wrote: You did not write that material, you lifted it verbatim, without accrediting the source or copyright owners. I don't think it is important when we are all singing the same old song. It was part of my own project too, not so far up but for Morecambe. I gave the facts. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/cru/kd01/orange/sdsp-06.asp. is worth reading to see the above in its proper, intended context, which in turn is part of a larger report Indeed. As with everything, the politics more or less dictate the perishing of our coastlines, our birds, our plants ... Some of us would be more interested in seeing the problems and not going on about the political ramblings of an individual talking about the the money raised through the destructive greed of organisations to sponsor research on the destruction ... That, Janet, gets me ****ed. So I skipped the blaha blahblah and went to the point :o) (I knew there must be some grim reason why those pesky basking sharks, dophins, porpoises, minke and killer whales, seals and otters keep swimming round the bay outside our window. They're homing in on my piles of glowing seaweed. ) You are indeed very lucky but perhaps the seaweeds blinding you. Perhaps you'd consider stopping picking seaweeds from our shores? |
Silver lining
Janet Baraclough wrote: Garbage. Yet again, you've cribbed web information you haven't got the reading skills to comprehend, and hopelessly misrepresented what it says. Here's the site you garbled: (snip) You wrongly placed the above paragraph to look as if the author was listing negative effects of what you call "Ascophyllum entensive harvesting in the Outer Hebrides". He was not; you moved that paragraph from a different context in a different section (snip) To conclude, not only have you ignorantly misrepresented the facts of Scottish seaweed businesses, you have also grossly misquoted a website which you shamelessly plagiarised and did not even accredit as your source. I don' t accredit anything. I'm perfectly safe in the knowledge of my knowledge. But thanks for the concerns. Furthermore, I think I'm repeating myself here since in my hurry I had already responded but somehow my post doesn't show. So I won't start again my post as I don't think I owe you any justification on my opinions. Finally, let me assure you, and other posters, that my reading skills are not bad considering I'm a foreigner - I gave the facts I used in my report for Morecambe a few months ago. I am not interested in corporates affairs when these are always to cover their destructive methods with 'researches for a better environment'. These were the facts I discussed - these are my interests, not quoting like you random facts that you keep picking from the net. I am indeed very dubious of your knowledge looking at most of your posts as I think you spend most of your time brooming the tea rooms and carrying tea cakes. |
Silver lining
Rupert wrote: Technetium 99--Well according to this link you don't need to worry. I will leave it to JB to administer yet more punishment. What, with a leather wip? I say. But I do eat a lot of spinash and sorrel. Would you think I'd grow a tache with the absortion of T99? Or will it grow naturally like Janet's? And sorry but I can't open your link. |
Silver lining
"La puce" wrote in message oups.com... Janet Baraclough wrote: Garbage. Yet again, you've cribbed web information you haven't got the reading skills to comprehend, and hopelessly misrepresented what it says. Here's the site you garbled: (snip) You wrongly placed the above paragraph to look as if the author was listing negative effects of what you call "Ascophyllum entensive harvesting in the Outer Hebrides". He was not; you moved that paragraph from a different context in a different section (snip) To conclude, not only have you ignorantly misrepresented the facts of Scottish seaweed businesses, you have also grossly misquoted a website which you shamelessly plagiarised and did not even accredit as your source. I don' t accredit anything. I'm perfectly safe in the knowledge of my knowledge. But thanks for the concerns. Furthermore, I think I'm repeating myself here since in my hurry I had already responded but somehow my post doesn't show. So I won't start again my post as I don't think I owe you any justification on my opinions. Finally, let me assure you, and other posters, that my reading skills are not bad considering I'm a foreigner - I gave the facts I used in my report for Morecambe a few months ago. I am not interested in corporates affairs when these are always to cover their destructive methods with 'researches for a better environment'. These were the facts I discussed - these are my interests, not quoting like you random facts that you keep picking from the net. I am indeed very dubious of your knowledge looking at most of your posts as I think you spend most of your time brooming the tea rooms and carrying tea cakes. Well said young lady.... the book "Bloody Foreigners" points out that at one time or another the so called Englishmen/women were all foreigners.....suspect that 100 percent of todays "Englishman/women" has some 'foreign' blood in them....perhaps from the days of the Roman Empire or one of the other many invaders of that fair country......a foreigner in the land called the USA.....albeit a 55 year resident. |
Silver lining
"Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... snip (I knew there must be some grim reason why those pesky basking sharks, dophins, porpoises, minke and killer whales, seals and otters keep swimming round the bay outside our window. They're homing in on my piles of glowing seaweed. ) Does your seaweed really glow, or are you alluding to the alleged radioactive content (visions of 'nuclear' piles of seaweed in Homer Simpson's back garden)? |
Silver lining
On 1/12/05 10:56, in article
, "La puce" wrote: Janet Baraclough wrote: Garbage. Yet again, you've cribbed web information you haven't got the reading skills to comprehend, and hopelessly misrepresented what it says. Here's the site you garbled: (snip) You wrongly placed the above paragraph to look as if the author was listing negative effects of what you call "Ascophyllum entensive harvesting in the Outer Hebrides". He was not; you moved that paragraph from a different context in a different section (snip) To conclude, not only have you ignorantly misrepresented the facts of Scottish seaweed businesses, you have also grossly misquoted a website which you shamelessly plagiarised and did not even accredit as your source. I don' t accredit anything. I'm perfectly safe in the knowledge of my knowledge. But thanks for the concerns. Furthermore, I think I'm repeating myself here since in my hurry I had already responded but somehow my post doesn't show. So I won't start again my post as I don't think I owe you any justification on my opinions. Finally, let me assure you, and other posters, that my reading skills are not bad considering I'm a foreigner - I gave the facts I used in my report for Morecambe a few months ago. I am not interested in corporates affairs when these are always to cover their destructive methods with 'researches for a better environment'. These were the facts I discussed - these are my interests, not quoting like you random facts that you keep picking from the net. I am indeed very dubious of your knowledge looking at most of your posts as I think you spend most of your time brooming the tea rooms and carrying tea cakes. Your reading skills are indeed extremely poor. The person whose family runs a Nursery with a tea room is me, not Janet. Up until now, I haven't commented on your apparent plagiarism. But as you're so concerned as to my occupation and how I spend my time, and appear to think it something with which to insult me, I do not work in the tea room, 'brooming' rooms or carrying cakes - we have a cook and staff who do that. As I have never discussed either the Nursery or the tea room with you, I cannot imagine how you think it any of your concern how I spend my time. But I will return the compliment by saying that you give every appearance of behaving like a badly trained Labrador, bouncing in and out of here with your inane remarks and poor quality information - but without the entertainment value of the real thing. If you choose to waste your time doing a course you can't even read properly, that is up to you but it certainly ill-becomes such as you to insult others over what they do with their lives! To be frank, given the fact that you appear unable to read as much as a message on a newsgroup, I can't say that I'm going to approach any 'information' from you with any confidence as to its accuracy or provenance. Yet again, you've given bad information, compounded that by letting people think it's your own work and then flown into an adolescent rage when found out and corrected. Grow up. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove the weeds to email me) |
Silver lining
Sacha wrote: Your reading skills are indeed extremely poor. (snip) ((something you should learn to do btw)) I will grant you this - I have indeed mistaken the two of you. And I wonder why, or should I? I am indeed very sorry to have touched a nerve - I haven't recovered on the 'french bitch' you see. But I will very much like to apologise to you personnally for hurting you. I am sorry as it is not really in my nature. My nature is indeed very jumpy, very speed, very bouncy but not as a labrador, rather like a flea, hence the nickname. You beleive what you will. I think my concerns over the use of seaweeds in some parts of the country is something important and my course doesn't cover opinions, but facts, sadly, but more to the point this has nothing to do with my course, but my work. As to waste my time, I think you are now wasting yours. I do not understand the 'work' you are referring to nor the 'provenance' of my thoughts. Perhaps you and Janet could enlighten me - you seem to know *so* much indeed. And please stop holding her hand like this, you're a big girl now. I would now urge the two of you to be really careful when responding from now on as I might find some free time to scrutinise all your posts from 'copyright', 'provenance', 'facts' and 'content'. Lets now see if your tongue is as long as you made us beleive it is. I'll skip on the rage - I have some research into different mowers to do and my frustration is such I think I'll spend the rest of my energy on this. |
Silver lining
On 1/12/05 11:52, in article
, "La puce" wrote: snip I would now urge the two of you to be really careful when responding from now on as I might find some free time to scrutinise all your posts from 'copyright', 'provenance', 'facts' and 'content'. Lets now see if your tongue is as long as you made us beleive it is. I'll skip on the rage - I have some research into different mowers to do and my frustration is such I think I'll spend the rest of my energy on this. Please don't make threats. Your behaviour has not put you in a position to monitor that of anyone else. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove the weeds to email me) |
Silver lining
"Sacha" wrote in message .uk... On 1/12/05 11:52, in article , "La puce" wrote: snip I would now urge the two of you to be really careful when responding from now on as I might find some free time to scrutinise all your posts from 'copyright', 'provenance', 'facts' and 'content'. Lets now see if your tongue is as long as you made us beleive it is. I'll skip on the rage - I have some research into different mowers to do and my frustration is such I think I'll spend the rest of my energy on this. Please don't make threats. Your behaviour has not put you in a position to monitor that of anyone else. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove the weeds to email me) meow meow meow |
Silver lining
Duncan wrote: "Fucus" sums that up nicely, then! :o) Missed this. As a kid I used to love popping the little water filled pustule with my feet, just like today's plastic 'tension sheets'. Hmmm... perhaps there's a golden mine there? |
Silver lining
On 1/12/05 18:07, in article , "Janet
Baraclough" wrote: The message k from Sacha contains these words: On 1/12/05 11:52, in article , "La puce" wrote: snip I would now urge the two of you to be really careful when responding from now on as I might find some free time to scrutinise all your posts from 'copyright', 'provenance', 'facts' and 'content'. Please don't make threats. It's getting to be a habit.Here's google's archive of one of her earlier threats and fantasies : snip Janet will not get away with it this time as she did in February 2004. .................................................. ............................ .................................................. ................ Curious. Under her current ID, Puce has no posting history on urg before October 05. So what on earth does she accuse me of "getting away with" in February 04 ? What's all that about, "Puce"? Another example of your bad memory, dishonesty, delusions and attempts to smear me? Or did you just forget which socks you have on ? Oh god, not *another* one. How wearying and how terminally dull. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove the weeds to email me) |
Silver lining
Janet Baraclough wrote: Curious. Under her current ID, Puce has no posting history on urg before October 05. So what on earth does she accuse me of "getting away with" in February 04 ? You had been rude to someone else's. Google your name and you'll see many upon many people you have offended. To name just a few, threads tittled 'How do you poison a connifer', 'Chicken pellets tub' and another called 'Thank You'. I had received lots of email from this forum's pips when you first attacked me, telling me about you and sadly Mike too which I think is a sweet man, if perhaps showing signs of being a bit bothered for having you under his skin. However, apparently I need to let you rambling coz that's the way you are. So be it. Ramble away and see if I care! What's all that about, "Puce"? Another example of your bad memory, dishonesty, delusions and attempts to smear me? You started Janet. I was happilly bumbling along as I usually do when you came up with all your links accusing me of accrediting myself with seaweeds info. So push off. Or did you just forget which socks you have on ? My socks are always different. Far too dark and too early to bother really. Go on, go on rambling. |
Silver lining
Sacha wrote: Oh god, not *another* one. How wearying and how terminally dull. Another what?! Another one you bully perhaps because they get the attention you don't get with your stoopid questions about standard wisteria when you already have one, stoopid question about the name of a rose that you already know?!? Just leave me alone if you are going to be vile and abusive. Get a life woman! |
Silver lining
-- .. "Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... The message .com from "La puce" contains these words: I had received lots of email from this forum's pips when you first attacked me, telling me about you I had received lots of email from this forum's pips when you first attacked me, telling me about you and sadly Mike too which I think is a sweet man, if perhaps showing signs of being a bit bothered for having you under his skin With friends like that, you don't need enemies. Janet mmmmmmmmmmmmeeeeeeeeeeeeeooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwww wwwww |
Silver lining
Janet Baraclough wrote: With friends like that, you don't need enemies. I don't understand. |
Silver lining
"Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... The message .com from "La puce" contains these words: I had received lots of email from this forum's pips when you first attacked me, telling me about you I had received lots of email from this forum's pips when you first attacked me, telling me about you and sadly Mike too which I think is a sweet man, if perhaps showing signs of being a bit bothered for having you under his skin With friends like that, you don't need enemies. Janet we could do with a few seagulls around this woman....amd let them do their thing...she will then be so busy cleaning up the crap she wont have any time for purring crap here |
Silver lining
-- .. "middleton.walker" wrote in message . .. "Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... The message .com from "La puce" contains these words: I had received lots of email from this forum's pips when you first attacked me, telling me about you I had received lots of email from this forum's pips when you first attacked me, telling me about you and sadly Mike too which I think is a sweet man, if perhaps showing signs of being a bit bothered for having you under his skin With friends like that, you don't need enemies. Janet we could do with a few seagulls around this woman....amd let them do their thing...she will then be so busy cleaning up the crap she wont have any time for purring crap here What a pity Elephants don't fly :-)) |
Silver lining
"Mike" wrote in message ... -- . "middleton.walker" wrote in message . .. "Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... The message .com from "La puce" contains these words: I had received lots of email from this forum's pips when you first attacked me, telling me about you I had received lots of email from this forum's pips when you first attacked me, telling me about you and sadly Mike too which I think is a sweet man, if perhaps showing signs of being a bit bothered for having you under his skin With friends like that, you don't need enemies. Janet we could do with a few seagulls around this woman....amd let them do their thing...she will then be so busy cleaning up the crap she wont have any time for purring crap here What a pity Elephants don't fly :-)) well done as ever Mike |
Silver lining
"La puce" wrote in message ups.com... Janet Baraclough wrote: With friends like that, you don't need enemies. I don't understand. I'm not surprised. -- Tumbleweed email replies not necessary but to contact use; tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com |
Silver lining
Tumbleweed wrote: I'm not surprised. Do you always feel that big behind your screen?! All your contributions so far are less than 5 words sentence and more often it's to antagonise. I don't understand what Janet meant by what she said. At least I'm honest. |
Silver lining
"La puce" wrote in message ups.com... Janet Baraclough wrote: With friends like that, you don't need enemies. I don't understand. Taking that at face value, the phrase usually means something along the lines that the person who says it thinks the subject has made a poor choice of a friend or friends. HTH. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:42 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter