"WaltA" wrote in message
...

The group who left in high dudgeon do the group no respect if they all
rush back in with this interminable nonsense.
Now that 'they' have 'returned'

Who exactly do you mean by "they" ?

Because very few people who left this NewsGroup have returned.
At any point since their departure weeks ago.

And this Newsgroup is the poorer for their loss, IMO.


michael adams

....

On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 02:22:40 -0000, "michael adams" wrote:
"WaltA" wrote in message
The group who left in high dudgeon do the group no respect if they all
rush back in with this interminable nonsense.
Now that 'they' have 'returned'

Who exactly do you mean by "they" ?

Now you are just being provocative,
or you have not been paying attention !

Because very few people who left this NewsGroup have returned.

True !
But the ones who did (it seems to me), only did so to continue ,,

Oh forget it ! Why did I bother (especially as I agree with your
recent reply to Rupert ! )

On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 02:22:40 -0000, "michael adams" wrote:

And this Newsgroup is the poorer for their loss, IMO.

That is by-the-by to what I (thought I) raised,
it may also be that your opinion is my opinion also, _IF_ they could
stay focussed on gardening matters,

If all they want to do is debate who said what to whom and who tried
to do what to their employers or others and who may (or may not) be
the most authoritative and
ohhhhhh groan, I care not !
and it says more about their self-perceived status as divas (or
harridans) that they think we are remotely concerened.

Like I said previously, they disrispect the rest of us by continuing
their grandstanding.
Cant they just realise that it tars them all and that ( usually) we
care not a fig ! ?

"WaltA" wrote in message
...


and it says more about their self-perceived status as divas (or
harridans) that they think we are remotely concerened.

Like I said previously, they disrispect the rest of us by continuing
their grandstanding.

And you're going to show your respect for the group by actually
naming names, rather than engaging in innuendos aren't you ?

So who exactly are these divas and harridans ?

All I do know is that some people do have a very dry sense of
humour, whilst other poor souls aren't exactly the sharpest
knives in the box.

So come on! Name names ! Wimp !


michael adams

....