Ping Andy Mabbett
 

"Sacha" wrote in message
. uk...
On 24/2/07 16:52, in article ,
"BAC"
wrote:


"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

snip

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

He has been posting on uk.environment.conservation for a while now,
primarily, it seems, to feud with Angus Macmillan, so the evidence
suggests
he is far from fed up either with carping or usenet.


Maybe he's fed up with Angus Macmillan? I wouldn't know. But everyone
has
their particular bugbears.


How true. Nonetheless, I thought a mention of (part of) Andy's current
Usenet activity was an appropriate and informative response to June's
musings.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:39:42 +0000, June Hughes
wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes
On 25/2/07 16:28, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group. It's only when people try to *use*
people's posts to
other groups to stir up trouble in this (or that) group that it matters,
IMO. Following people round the internet and constantly referring
to their
behaviour on 'other groups' is simply trying to make trouble in the
'innocent' group, it seems to me. The characters and dynamics of
each group
are different, so people may well react differently on one to another. I
know what I think of the behaviour of certain people here, the
good, the bad
and even the moderately attractive and here is what counts when I'm here.

Yes. Do you mean just like you followed me to ukfd and tried to get me
frog-marched out. Didn't work did it, Sacha?

June, I am really very, very sorry for you because your life seems to be one
never-ending grudge bearing whine.

Was that a whine? I thought it was a statement of fact. Silly me!
Never mind, Sacha. Whatever you say. After all, you always have the
last word and are always right about everything - not:) People tell me
you are a pleasant woman in real life.

Its FEMALE!
--
So it is:)
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , BAC
writes

"Sacha" wrote in message
.uk...
On 24/2/07 16:52, in article ,
"BAC"
wrote:


"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

snip

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

He has been posting on uk.environment.conservation for a while now,
primarily, it seems, to feud with Angus Macmillan, so the evidence
suggests
he is far from fed up either with carping or usenet.


Maybe he's fed up with Angus Macmillan? I wouldn't know. But everyone
has
their particular bugbears.


How true. Nonetheless, I thought a mention of (part of) Andy's current
Usenet activity was an appropriate and informative response to June's
musings.


Yes it was. Thanks.
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes


I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4


Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him. IIRC,
someone pretended to be dear old Alan Holmes some time ago and said all
manner or dreadful things. I was accused by someone (no-one here) of
sending a profane email to them and have never sent a profane email in
my life, so it may not be Andy. Having said that, I think it was Sacha
who posted how to tell the author of a posting but I have lost that.
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:59:59 +0000, June Hughes
wrote:

In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes


I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4


Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him.

Muppett has his own distinctive fingerprint, in his relentless
bullying of those he considers to have failed usenet protocol. The guy
is an idiot, no mistakes.

Don't waste your time with the likes of him. Take each post on its
merit, and choose to kill file or not. Life is too short for the rest
I'm afraid.
--









Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On Feb 26, 12:59 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes



I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4

Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him. IIRC,
someone pretended to be dear old Alan Holmes some time ago and said all
manner or dreadful things. I was accused by someone (no-one here) of
sending a profane email to them and have never sent a profane email in
my life, so it may not be Andy. Having said that, I think it was Sacha
who posted how to tell the author of a posting but I have lost that.

Interestingly, the poster you are now replying to has in the past
often adopted names of people he/she/it dislikes on newsgroups. This
poster may however not even be a person, but an automated response bot
with sophisticated, state-of-the-art software.The current name
corresponds to the very first one he/she/it used, though all those
posts have now been removed from the GOOGLE archive. This is
presumably a futile attempt to try and escape police questioning
concerning A/R terrorism that his/her/its friends have been involved
in recently.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 26 Feb 2007 08:47:46 -0800, "John M."
wrote:

On Feb 26, 12:59 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes



I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4

Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him. IIRC,
someone pretended to be dear old Alan Holmes some time ago and said all
manner or dreadful things. I was accused by someone (no-one here) of
sending a profane email to them and have never sent a profane email in
my life, so it may not be Andy. Having said that, I think it was Sacha
who posted how to tell the author of a posting but I have lost that.

Interestingly, the poster you are now replying to has in the past
often adopted names of people he/she/it dislikes on newsgroups. This
poster may however not even be a person, but an automated response bot
with sophisticated, state-of-the-art software.The current name
corresponds to the very first one he/she/it used, though all those
posts have now been removed from the GOOGLE archive. This is
presumably a futile attempt to try and escape police questioning
concerning A/R terrorism that his/her/its friends have been involved
in recently.

Seem to have touched a nerve there Mabbett? Never mind, you might get
over it.


--









Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:39:44 +0000, "Pete ‹(•¿•)›"
wrote:

On 26 Feb 2007 08:47:46 -0800, "John M."
wrote:

On Feb 26, 12:59 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes



I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4

Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him. IIRC,
someone pretended to be dear old Alan Holmes some time ago and said all
manner or dreadful things. I was accused by someone (no-one here) of
sending a profane email to them and have never sent a profane email in
my life, so it may not be Andy. Having said that, I think it was Sacha
who posted how to tell the author of a posting but I have lost that.

Interestingly, the poster you are now replying to has in the past
often adopted names of people he/she/it dislikes on newsgroups. This
poster may however not even be a person, but an automated response bot
with sophisticated, state-of-the-art software.The current name
corresponds to the very first one he/she/it used, though all those
posts have now been removed from the GOOGLE archive. This is
presumably a futile attempt to try and escape police questioning
concerning A/R terrorism that his/her/its friends have been involved
in recently.

Seem to have touched a nerve there Mabbett? Never mind, you might get
over it.


Andy is little more that a one line repeater.

A single shot cap gun with damp caps.

Mind you, I've heard he's good at sewing stockings, so there's always
some good in the worst of us :-)



Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

"Pete (.¿.)" wrote

Muppett has his own distinctive fingerprint, in his relentless
bullying of those he considers to have failed usenet protocol. The guy
is an idiot, no mistakes.

Don't waste your time with the likes of him. Take each post on its
merit, and choose to kill file or not. Life is too short for the rest
I'm afraid.
--

Disclaimer
snip
Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use
your
newsreaders kill filter.

Rage Against The Machine are reforming this year, phone Zack for a spot in
the band ;-)

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 26 Feb, 23:43, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:39:44 +0000, "Pete Â* Â* Â* ‹(•¿•)›"





wrote:
On 26 Feb 2007 08:47:46 -0800, "John M."
wrote:

On Feb 26, 12:59 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes

I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4

Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him. Â*IIRC,
someone pretended to be dear old Alan Holmes some time ago and said all
manner or dreadful things. Â*I was accused by someone (no-one here) of
sending a profane email to them and have never sent a profane email in
my life, so it may not be Andy. Â*Having said that, I think it was Sacha
who posted how to tell the author of a posting but I have lost that.

Interestingly, the poster you are now replying to has in the past
often adopted names of people he/she/it dislikes on newsgroups. This
poster may however not even be a person, but an automated response bot
with sophisticated, state-of-the-art software.The current name
corresponds to the very first one he/she/it used, though all those
posts have now been removed from the GOOGLE archive. This is
presumably a futile attempt to try and escape police questioning
concerning A/R terrorism that his/her/its friends have been involved
in recently.

Seem to have touched a nerve there Mabbett? Never mind, you might get
over it.

Andy is little more that a one line repeater.

A single shot cap gun with damp caps.

Mind you, I've heard he's good at sewing stockings, so there's always
some good in the worst of us :-)

Bigotry.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 28 Feb 2007 02:46:15 -0800, "John M."
wrote:

On 26 Feb, 23:43, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:39:44 +0000, "Pete * * * ‹(•¿•)›"





wrote:
On 26 Feb 2007 08:47:46 -0800, "John M."
wrote:

On Feb 26, 12:59 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes

I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4

Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him. *IIRC,
someone pretended to be dear old Alan Holmes some time ago and said all
manner or dreadful things. *I was accused by someone (no-one here) of
sending a profane email to them and have never sent a profane email in
my life, so it may not be Andy. *Having said that, I think it was Sacha
who posted how to tell the author of a posting but I have lost that.

Interestingly, the poster you are now replying to has in the past
often adopted names of people he/she/it dislikes on newsgroups. This
poster may however not even be a person, but an automated response bot
with sophisticated, state-of-the-art software.The current name
corresponds to the very first one he/she/it used, though all those
posts have now been removed from the GOOGLE archive. This is
presumably a futile attempt to try and escape police questioning
concerning A/R terrorism that his/her/its friends have been involved
in recently.

Seem to have touched a nerve there Mabbett? Never mind, you might get
over it.

Andy is little more that a one line repeater.

A single shot cap gun with damp caps.

Mind you, I've heard he's good at sewing stockings, so there's always
some good in the worst of us :-)

Bigotry.


Yes, that's another of his habits.


--


Avoid the rush at the last judgement. Be converted now instead!




Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.