Ping Andy Mabbett
 

From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Mike

.................................................. .........
Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rnshipmates.co.uk
www.nsrafa.com

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:15:52 +0000, June Hughes wrote:

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly

Dunno about that :-)

I do however remember that he had the upper hand over the nasty Crowe.

Come back to us Andy :-)
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 23/2/07 22:15, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Check out what Crowe has done to Mabbett on Usenet.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , Sacha
writes
On 23/2/07 22:15, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Check out what Crowe has done to Mabbett on Usenet.

Why should I want to do that? As said, I have found Andy to be friendly
and knowledgeable. I am certainly not interested wasting time finding
out what someone else thinks of him.
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 23/2/07 23:31, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes
On 23/2/07 22:15, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Check out what Crowe has done to Mabbett on Usenet.

Why should I want to do that? As said, I have found Andy to be friendly
and knowledgeable. I am certainly not interested wasting time finding
out what someone else thinks of him.

Fine, June. You do just as you please.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 24/2/07 10:20, in article ,
"Martin" wrote:

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:15:52 +0000, June Hughes

wrote:

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Like Mike, he is a man of many faces. Liked here, loathed elsewhere.

Andy was a popular and knowledgeable member of this group which, to this
group is all that matters, I suppose? Like a lot of us, he held strong
opinions but I never recall him being insulting or spiteful or writing posts
just for the sake of annoying or hurting others.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , Martin
writes
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:15:52 +0000, June Hughes

wrote:

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Like Mike, he is a man of many faces. Liked here, loathed elsewhere.
Oh well. Takes all sorts.
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 24 Feb, 15:35, Martin wrote:
Not here, just as Mike doesn't on all groups.
--

Martin

Hi Martin, how is it in Holland today, it's wet and windy and dreary
at Norwich so I expect you have similar weather?

I only know of Andy Mabbett in this group, I don't know why he stopped
posting as I found him very reliable and quite an expert on
gardening. I killed a lot of the threads around the time he was
posting as a couple of posters, not Andy, went, to put it literally,
off their heads and I just didn't want to read such awful, nasty stuff
that was nothing at all to do with gardening.

With regard to people on groups and their behaviour, I tend not to be
interested in what they post to other groups, unless I am contributing
to that group. However, saying that, it is an indication that if they
are vulgar and use foul language in any group, that this is part of
their make-up and I would not want to associate with them on or off
group


Judith at home

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , Martin
writes
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:03:49 +0000, June Hughes

wrote:

In message , Martin
writes
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:15:52 +0000, June Hughes

wrote:

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Like Mike, he is a man of many faces. Liked here, loathed elsewhere.
Oh well. Takes all sorts.

I wasn't trying to suggest that Mike is liked here.
No. I didn't think you were. I was referring to Mike when I said
'takes all sorts'. I don't really take much notice of him to be honest,
except when he tells a joke I think is funny.
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , Sacha
writes
On 23/2/07 22:15, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net
Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Check out what Crowe has done to Mabbett on Usenet.

Why should I want to do that? As said, I have found Andy to be friendly
and knowledgeable. I am certainly not interested wasting time finding out
what someone else thinks of him.

But this might tell you why Andy has decided to avoid this newsgroup!

Alan

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

snip

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

He has been posting on uk.environment.conservation for a while now,
primarily, it seems, to feud with Angus Macmillan, so the evidence suggests
he is far from fed up either with carping or usenet.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , Alan Holmes
writes

"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , Sacha
writes
On 23/2/07 22:15, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net
Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Check out what Crowe has done to Mabbett on Usenet.

Why should I want to do that? As said, I have found Andy to be friendly
and knowledgeable. I am certainly not interested wasting time finding out
what someone else thinks of him.

But this might tell you why Andy has decided to avoid this newsgroup!

It also means going to Google and trailing though past posts. I am not
that interested, have better things to do and find that activity rather
sordid.
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , Martin
writes
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:35:06 +0000, June Hughes

wrote:


I wasn't trying to suggest that Mike is liked here.
No. I didn't think you were. I was referring to Mike when I said
'takes all sorts'. I don't really take much notice of him to be honest,
except when he tells a joke I think is funny.

In that case, I pretend not to laugh.

G
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , BAC
writes

"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

snip

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

He has been posting on uk.environment.conservation for a while now,
primarily, it seems, to feud with Angus Macmillan, so the evidence suggests
he is far from fed up either with carping or usenet.


Some people just rub each other up the wrong way. I am trying to learn
to ignore those who have a go at me. It's quite easy when you decided
to do it.
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 24 Feb, 17:04, Martin wrote:
On 24 Feb 2007 07:50:21 -0800, "

wrote:
On 24 Feb, 15:35, Martin wrote:
Not here, just as Mike doesn't on all groups.
Hi Martin, how is it in Holland today, it's wet and windy and dreary
at Norwich so I expect you have similar weather?

Exactly the same, but it's Saturday and to be expected.

I don't want to talk about Andy M.
--

Martin

That's fine Martin, I don't know Andy or anything about him so lets
move on to gardening.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 24/2/07 15:35, in article ,
"Martin" wrote:

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:31:41 +0000, Sacha
wrote:
snip

Andy was a popular and knowledgeable member of this group which, to this
group is all that matters, I suppose? Like a lot of us, he held strong
opinions but I never recall him being insulting or spiteful or writing posts
just for the sake of annoying or hurting others.

Not here, just as Mike doesn't on all groups.

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group. It's only when people try to *use* people's posts to
other groups to stir up trouble in this (or that) group that it matters,
IMO. Following people round the internet and constantly referring to their
behaviour on 'other groups' is simply trying to make trouble in the
'innocent' group, it seems to me. The characters and dynamics of each group
are different, so people may well react differently on one to another. I
know what I think of the behaviour of certain people here, the good, the bad
and even the moderately attractive and here is what counts when I'm here.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 24/2/07 16:52, in article , "BAC"
wrote:


"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

snip

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

He has been posting on uk.environment.conservation for a while now,
primarily, it seems, to feud with Angus Macmillan, so the evidence suggests
he is far from fed up either with carping or usenet.


Maybe he's fed up with Angus Macmillan? I wouldn't know. But everyone has
their particular bugbears.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 24 Feb, 18:44, Sacha wrote:

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group.

LOL!!! Sorry, this tickled me far too much.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , Alan Holmes
writes

"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , Sacha
writes
On 23/2/07 22:15, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net
Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Check out what Crowe has done to Mabbett on Usenet.

Why should I want to do that? As said, I have found Andy to be friendly
and knowledgeable. I am certainly not interested wasting time finding
out
what someone else thinks of him.

But this might tell you why Andy has decided to avoid this newsgroup!

It also means going to Google and trailing though past posts. I am not
that interested, have better things to do and find that activity rather
sordid.

Well I have to admit that if I would have to use google, I'd forget it as
well!

Alan

--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message . com,
" writes
On 24 Feb, 17:04, Martin wrote:
On 24 Feb 2007 07:50:21 -0800, "

wrote:
On 24 Feb, 15:35, Martin wrote:
Not here, just as Mike doesn't on all groups.
Hi Martin, how is it in Holland today, it's wet and windy and dreary
at Norwich so I expect you have similar weather?

Exactly the same, but it's Saturday and to be expected.

I don't want to talk about Andy M.
--

Martin

That's fine Martin, I don't know Andy or anything about him so lets
move on to gardening.

You knew Andy many years ago. You must have forgotten.
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 25 Feb, 09:57, Martin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:37:23 +0000, June Hughes
wrote:

In message . com,
" writes
That's fine Martin, I don't know Andy or anything about him so lets
move on to gardening.

You knew Andy many years ago. You must have forgotten.

Nobody forgets Andy.
--

Martin

No, I don't remember Andy and I am absolutely sure of that.

Judith still at home

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message om,
" writes
On 25 Feb, 09:57, Martin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:37:23 +0000, June Hughes

wrote:

In message . com,
" writes
That's fine Martin, I don't know Andy or anything about him so lets
move on to gardening.

You knew Andy many years ago. You must have forgotten.

Nobody forgets Andy.
--

Martin

No, I don't remember Andy and I am absolutely sure of that.

I think but am not sure, that he was on the demon new users' group.
User name similar to 'pigsmayfly' or something. Doesn't really matter
anyway. He's not here.


--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

"Martin" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:37:23 +0000, June Hughes

wrote:

In message . com,
" writes

That's fine Martin, I don't know Andy or anything about him so lets
move on to gardening.

You knew Andy many years ago. You must have forgotten.

Nobody forgets Andy.

I have!

--

Martin

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 25 Feb, 13:48, Martin wrote:
On 25 Feb 2007 04:01:26 -0800, "





wrote:
On 25 Feb, 09:57, Martin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:37:23 +0000, June Hughes
wrote:

In message . com,
" writes
That's fine Martin, I don't know Andy or anything about him so lets
move on to gardening.

You knew Andy many years ago. You must have forgotten.

Nobody forgets Andy.
--

Martin

No, I don't remember Andy and I am absolutely sure of that.

Judith still at home

You can buy his book cheaphttp://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?sts=t&an=Mabbett%2C+And...
--

Martin- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I don't think so thank you Martin, I was never into Pink Floyd, now if
it was the Who.

Judith who is still home

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , Sacha
writes
On 24/2/07 15:35, in article ,
"Martin" wrote:

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:31:41 +0000, Sacha
wrote:
snip

Andy was a popular and knowledgeable member of this group which, to this
group is all that matters, I suppose? Like a lot of us, he held strong
opinions but I never recall him being insulting or spiteful or writing posts
just for the sake of annoying or hurting others.

Not here, just as Mike doesn't on all groups.

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group. It's only when people try to *use* people's posts to
other groups to stir up trouble in this (or that) group that it matters,
IMO. Following people round the internet and constantly referring to their
behaviour on 'other groups' is simply trying to make trouble in the
'innocent' group, it seems to me. The characters and dynamics of each group
are different, so people may well react differently on one to another. I
know what I think of the behaviour of certain people here, the good, the bad
and even the moderately attractive and here is what counts when I'm here.

Yes. Do you mean just like you followed me to ukfd and tried to get me
frog-marched out. Didn't work did it, Sacha?
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 25/2/07 16:28, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes
On 24/2/07 15:35, in article ,
"Martin" wrote:

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:31:41 +0000, Sacha
wrote:
snip

Andy was a popular and knowledgeable member of this group which, to this
group is all that matters, I suppose? Like a lot of us, he held strong
opinions but I never recall him being insulting or spiteful or writing
posts
just for the sake of annoying or hurting others.

Not here, just as Mike doesn't on all groups.

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group. It's only when people try to *use* people's posts to
other groups to stir up trouble in this (or that) group that it matters,
IMO. Following people round the internet and constantly referring to their
behaviour on 'other groups' is simply trying to make trouble in the
'innocent' group, it seems to me. The characters and dynamics of each group
are different, so people may well react differently on one to another. I
know what I think of the behaviour of certain people here, the good, the bad
and even the moderately attractive and here is what counts when I'm here.

Yes. Do you mean just like you followed me to ukfd and tried to get me
frog-marched out. Didn't work did it, Sacha?

June, I am really very, very sorry for you because your life seems to be one
never-ending grudge bearing whine.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , Sacha
writes
On 25/2/07 16:28, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group. It's only when people try to *use* people's posts to
other groups to stir up trouble in this (or that) group that it matters,
IMO. Following people round the internet and constantly referring to their
behaviour on 'other groups' is simply trying to make trouble in the
'innocent' group, it seems to me. The characters and dynamics of each group
are different, so people may well react differently on one to another. I
know what I think of the behaviour of certain people here, the good, the bad
and even the moderately attractive and here is what counts when I'm here.

Yes. Do you mean just like you followed me to ukfd and tried to get me
frog-marched out. Didn't work did it, Sacha?

June, I am really very, very sorry for you because your life seems to be one
never-ending grudge bearing whine.

Was that a whine? I thought it was a statement of fact. Silly me!
Never mind, Sacha. Whatever you say. After all, you always have the
last word and are always right about everything - not:) People tell me
you are a pleasant woman in real life.
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:15:52 +0000, June Hughes
wrote:

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable.

I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4


Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--









Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:39:42 +0000, June Hughes
wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes
On 25/2/07 16:28, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group. It's only when people try to *use* people's posts to
other groups to stir up trouble in this (or that) group that it matters,
IMO. Following people round the internet and constantly referring to their
behaviour on 'other groups' is simply trying to make trouble in the
'innocent' group, it seems to me. The characters and dynamics of each group
are different, so people may well react differently on one to another. I
know what I think of the behaviour of certain people here, the good, the bad
and even the moderately attractive and here is what counts when I'm here.

Yes. Do you mean just like you followed me to ukfd and tried to get me
frog-marched out. Didn't work did it, Sacha?

June, I am really very, very sorry for you because your life seems to be one
never-ending grudge bearing whine.

Was that a whine? I thought it was a statement of fact. Silly me!
Never mind, Sacha. Whatever you say. After all, you always have the
last word and are always right about everything - not:) People tell me
you are a pleasant woman in real life.

Its FEMALE!
--









Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

"Sacha" wrote in message
. uk...
On 24/2/07 16:52, in article ,
"BAC"
wrote:


"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

snip

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

He has been posting on uk.environment.conservation for a while now,
primarily, it seems, to feud with Angus Macmillan, so the evidence
suggests
he is far from fed up either with carping or usenet.


Maybe he's fed up with Angus Macmillan? I wouldn't know. But everyone
has
their particular bugbears.


How true. Nonetheless, I thought a mention of (part of) Andy's current
Usenet activity was an appropriate and informative response to June's
musings.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:39:42 +0000, June Hughes
wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes
On 25/2/07 16:28, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group. It's only when people try to *use*
people's posts to
other groups to stir up trouble in this (or that) group that it matters,
IMO. Following people round the internet and constantly referring
to their
behaviour on 'other groups' is simply trying to make trouble in the
'innocent' group, it seems to me. The characters and dynamics of
each group
are different, so people may well react differently on one to another. I
know what I think of the behaviour of certain people here, the
good, the bad
and even the moderately attractive and here is what counts when I'm here.

Yes. Do you mean just like you followed me to ukfd and tried to get me
frog-marched out. Didn't work did it, Sacha?

June, I am really very, very sorry for you because your life seems to be one
never-ending grudge bearing whine.

Was that a whine? I thought it was a statement of fact. Silly me!
Never mind, Sacha. Whatever you say. After all, you always have the
last word and are always right about everything - not:) People tell me
you are a pleasant woman in real life.

Its FEMALE!
--
So it is:)
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , BAC
writes

"Sacha" wrote in message
.uk...
On 24/2/07 16:52, in article ,
"BAC"
wrote:


"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

snip

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

He has been posting on uk.environment.conservation for a while now,
primarily, it seems, to feud with Angus Macmillan, so the evidence
suggests
he is far from fed up either with carping or usenet.


Maybe he's fed up with Angus Macmillan? I wouldn't know. But everyone
has
their particular bugbears.


How true. Nonetheless, I thought a mention of (part of) Andy's current
Usenet activity was an appropriate and informative response to June's
musings.


Yes it was. Thanks.
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes


I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4


Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him. IIRC,
someone pretended to be dear old Alan Holmes some time ago and said all
manner or dreadful things. I was accused by someone (no-one here) of
sending a profane email to them and have never sent a profane email in
my life, so it may not be Andy. Having said that, I think it was Sacha
who posted how to tell the author of a posting but I have lost that.
--
June Hughes

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:59:59 +0000, June Hughes
wrote:

In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes


I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4


Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him.

Muppett has his own distinctive fingerprint, in his relentless
bullying of those he considers to have failed usenet protocol. The guy
is an idiot, no mistakes.

Don't waste your time with the likes of him. Take each post on its
merit, and choose to kill file or not. Life is too short for the rest
I'm afraid.
--









Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On Feb 26, 12:59 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes



I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4

Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him. IIRC,
someone pretended to be dear old Alan Holmes some time ago and said all
manner or dreadful things. I was accused by someone (no-one here) of
sending a profane email to them and have never sent a profane email in
my life, so it may not be Andy. Having said that, I think it was Sacha
who posted how to tell the author of a posting but I have lost that.

Interestingly, the poster you are now replying to has in the past
often adopted names of people he/she/it dislikes on newsgroups. This
poster may however not even be a person, but an automated response bot
with sophisticated, state-of-the-art software.The current name
corresponds to the very first one he/she/it used, though all those
posts have now been removed from the GOOGLE archive. This is
presumably a futile attempt to try and escape police questioning
concerning A/R terrorism that his/her/its friends have been involved
in recently.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 26 Feb 2007 08:47:46 -0800, "John M."
wrote:

On Feb 26, 12:59 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes



I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4

Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him. IIRC,
someone pretended to be dear old Alan Holmes some time ago and said all
manner or dreadful things. I was accused by someone (no-one here) of
sending a profane email to them and have never sent a profane email in
my life, so it may not be Andy. Having said that, I think it was Sacha
who posted how to tell the author of a posting but I have lost that.

Interestingly, the poster you are now replying to has in the past
often adopted names of people he/she/it dislikes on newsgroups. This
poster may however not even be a person, but an automated response bot
with sophisticated, state-of-the-art software.The current name
corresponds to the very first one he/she/it used, though all those
posts have now been removed from the GOOGLE archive. This is
presumably a futile attempt to try and escape police questioning
concerning A/R terrorism that his/her/its friends have been involved
in recently.

Seem to have touched a nerve there Mabbett? Never mind, you might get
over it.


--









Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:39:44 +0000, "Pete ‹(•¿•)›"
wrote:

On 26 Feb 2007 08:47:46 -0800, "John M."
wrote:

On Feb 26, 12:59 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes



I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4

Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him. IIRC,
someone pretended to be dear old Alan Holmes some time ago and said all
manner or dreadful things. I was accused by someone (no-one here) of
sending a profane email to them and have never sent a profane email in
my life, so it may not be Andy. Having said that, I think it was Sacha
who posted how to tell the author of a posting but I have lost that.

Interestingly, the poster you are now replying to has in the past
often adopted names of people he/she/it dislikes on newsgroups. This
poster may however not even be a person, but an automated response bot
with sophisticated, state-of-the-art software.The current name
corresponds to the very first one he/she/it used, though all those
posts have now been removed from the GOOGLE archive. This is
presumably a futile attempt to try and escape police questioning
concerning A/R terrorism that his/her/its friends have been involved
in recently.

Seem to have touched a nerve there Mabbett? Never mind, you might get
over it.


Andy is little more that a one line repeater.

A single shot cap gun with damp caps.

Mind you, I've heard he's good at sewing stockings, so there's always
some good in the worst of us :-)



Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

"Pete (.¿.)" wrote

Muppett has his own distinctive fingerprint, in his relentless
bullying of those he considers to have failed usenet protocol. The guy
is an idiot, no mistakes.

Don't waste your time with the likes of him. Take each post on its
merit, and choose to kill file or not. Life is too short for the rest
I'm afraid.
--

Disclaimer
snip
Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use
your
newsreaders kill filter.

Rage Against The Machine are reforming this year, phone Zack for a spot in
the band ;-)

Ping Andy Mabbett
 

On 26 Feb, 23:43, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:39:44 +0000, "Pete Â* Â* Â* ‹(•¿•)›"





wrote:
On 26 Feb 2007 08:47:46 -0800, "John M."
wrote:

On Feb 26, 12:59 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message , "Pete
‹(•¿•)›" writes

I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4

Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--

All I can say is that it may be someone pretending to be him. Â*IIRC,
someone pretended to be dear old Alan Holmes some time ago and said all
manner or dreadful things. Â*I was accused by someone (no-one here) of
sending a profane email to them and have never sent a profane email in
my life, so it may not be Andy. Â*Having said that, I think it was Sacha
who posted how to tell the author of a posting but I have lost that.

Interestingly, the poster you are now replying to has in the past
often adopted names of people he/she/it dislikes on newsgroups. This
poster may however not even be a person, but an automated response bot
with sophisticated, state-of-the-art software.The current name
corresponds to the very first one he/she/it used, though all those
posts have now been removed from the GOOGLE archive. This is
presumably a futile attempt to try and escape police questioning
concerning A/R terrorism that his/her/its friends have been involved
in recently.

Seem to have touched a nerve there Mabbett? Never mind, you might get
over it.

Andy is little more that a one line repeater.

A single shot cap gun with damp caps.

Mind you, I've heard he's good at sewing stockings, so there's always
some good in the worst of us :-)

Bigotry.