|
urg meet
"Sacha" wrote in message . uk... I'm still hoping to have an urg meet here on 7th July with the option of going down to Charlie's nursery on the 8th - people could probably take in the Eden Project that day, too but Charlie will give timings and directions for that! People who want to make it a bit of a holiday could perhaps, go on from Charlie's to Penzance and take the helicopter to Tresco the next day for a day or overnight trip. For those who'd like to come here, we have room in the car park for a couple or three caravans, as those who have been before will know; lunch is on us and the evenings are, as tour directors say, 'at liberty'. ;-) There are several good b&bs in and around this village and a very little further afield and there is plenty to see and do in the area generally. Our local pub is very good and there are other and excellent ones around here, too. If anyone who hopes to come wants to know about local accommodation, let me know. I've been in contact with Cormaic and they're going to try to make it if they can. Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. If you would like to join us, please email me or let me know here and if anyone has any food allergies, please nudge me nearer the time. I'll post a reminder a bit later, too. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) Just to let everyone know that whilst we can not offer anyone a bed for the night we shall as Sacha has indicated be home on both days and are happy to entertain you all either in dribs and drabs or on mass! We know we are a long way down and most will not want to make the extra journey. Any one who does want to make a short break of it we are within half a mile of two camp sites and numerous B&Bs I will ask nearer the time who might be coming. -- Charlie, gardening in Cornwall. http://www.roselandhouse.co.uk Holders of National Plant Collections of Clematis viticella (cvs) and Lapageria rosea |
urg meet
On 28/2/07 11:11, in article , "Charlie
Pridham" wrote: snip Just to let everyone know that whilst we can not offer anyone a bed for the night we shall as Sacha has indicated be home on both days and are happy to entertain you all either in dribs and drabs or on mass! We know we are a long way down and most will not want to make the extra journey. Any one who does want to make a short break of it we are within half a mile of two camp sites and numerous B&Bs I will ask nearer the time who might be coming. Charlie, how long would it take to drive from our meet to your meet, do you think? I'm just thinking it would help people to plan their weekend as they could decide whether to drive down to your area on the Saturday night or the Sunday morning. I imagine being a Saturday meet here, it's going to be difficult for you and Liz to get away and come to lunch here? If you can make it, that would be lovely! -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
urg meet
On 27 Feb, 23:20, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from Sacha contains these words: Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense! -- AnneJ Was that really necessary, why on earth did you make that nasty comment for - I am gobsmacked!!! Judith |
urg meet
In message , Anne Jackson
writes The message from Sacha contains these words: Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense! She says they know who they are. Mystery abounds. I expect I am one of the two excluded, although I can think of at least two others she has taken even more of a dislike to than me and the first person. As I have been informed that she accused at least two people of making threats to her family (I don't believe one of them was me, or at least I hope it wasn't, because I didn't), it's something I regret *very* much having to say:) -- June Hughes |
urg meet
In message .com,
" writes On 27 Feb, 23:20, Anne Jackson wrote: The message from Sacha contains these words: Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense! -- AnneJ Was that really necessary, why on earth did you make that nasty comment for - I am gobsmacked!!! Writing as one of the people Sacha loves to ostracise, I don't think it was nasty. Just a fair comment. -- June Hughes |
urg meet
On 28 Feb, 16:24, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:20:54 GMT, Anne Jackson wrote: The message from Sacha contains these words: Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense! Contact Puce for bookings for the urg summer holiday in Aran in the Big Red Bus. I see our resident troll is back - for goodness sake what started out as an invitation to a meet has turned into one or two people grinding their own particular axes, we are all bored to death with it - give it a rest. Judth |
urg meet
On 28/2/07 16:49, in article
, " wrote: On 28 Feb, 16:24, wrote: On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:20:54 GMT, Anne Jackson wrote: The message from Sacha contains these words: Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense! Contact Puce for bookings for the urg summer holiday in Aran in the Big Red Bus. I see our resident troll is back - for goodness sake what started out as an invitation to a meet has turned into one or two people grinding their own particular axes, we are all bored to death with it - give it a rest. Judth Imagine the cheek of me thinking it was my right to invite who I wish to our house. ;-)) -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
urg meet
In message . com,
" writes On 28 Feb, 16:24, wrote: On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:20:54 GMT, Anne Jackson wrote: The message from Sacha contains these words: Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense! Contact Puce for bookings for the urg summer holiday in Aran in the Big Red Bus. I see our resident troll is back - for goodness sake what started out as an invitation to a meet has turned into one or two people grinding their own particular axes, we are all bored to death with it - give it a rest. Not necessarily, Judith. Two people were specifically excluded from the invitation. If you want to make someone feel uncomfortable, that is the way to do it. She could just as well have invited people by email and left it out of urg altogether. That way, those who were excluded didn't have to know about it and those she wanted to attend would. Instead of that, she broadcast it for all to see. Would you like it if it were you who were excluded? -- June Hughes |
urg meet
In message , Sacha
writes On 28/2/07 16:49, in article . com, " wrote: On 28 Feb, 16:24, wrote: On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:20:54 GMT, Anne Jackson wrote: The message from Sacha contains these words: Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense! Contact Puce for bookings for the urg summer holiday in Aran in the Big Red Bus. I see our resident troll is back - for goodness sake what started out as an invitation to a meet has turned into one or two people grinding their own particular axes, we are all bored to death with it - give it a rest. Judth Imagine the cheek of me thinking it was my right to invite who I wish to our house. ;-)) This is Usenet. You specifically said there were two people you were not inviting out of all those who read and write here. That makes people feel uncomfortable but you must have known that. It is like the child at school announcing in front of the whole class, 'I am having a birthday party for everyone in the class, except for two people'. It would surely have been better if you had emailed those you were inviting. You can do that in one email addressed to many, as I am sure you are aware. You have mentioned since how you have heard from people about others trying to sabotage your party. If you had restricted your announcements to email, that would not have happened, would it? (And before you start, no, it was not me who attempted to sabotage your do). -- June Hughes |
urg meet
On 28 Feb, 16:59, June Hughes wrote:
In message . com, " writes On 28 Feb, 16:24, wrote: On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:20:54 GMT, Anne Jackson wrote: The message from Sacha contains these words: Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense! Contact Puce for bookings for the urg summer holiday in Aran in the Big Red Bus. I see our resident troll is back - for goodness sake what started out as an invitation to a meet has turned into one or two people grinding their own particular axes, we are all bored to death with it - give it a rest. Not necessarily, Judith. Two people were specifically excluded from the invitation. If you want to make someone feel uncomfortable, that is the way to do it. She could just as well have invited people by email and left it out of urg altogether. That way, those who were excluded didn't have to know about it and those she wanted to attend would. Instead of that, she broadcast it for all to see. Would you like it if it were you who were excluded? -- June Hughes- Hide quoted text - Why on earth should she invite by email, it is an urg meet and if certain people have offended her, then it is her right not to invite them. I will be having an urg meet and again, there is a person that I would not like to see in my home. I have been to meets where an individual would not be welcome, this is life, we invite into our sitting rooms members of a group and if one or two are excluded, then too bad. If I had insulted anyone the way Sacha has been insulted, then I would be very surprised indeed if I were invited. This is my last word on the subject as all genuine urglers are sick to the teeth of this. Judith |
urg meet
The message
from Sacha contains these words: I'm still hoping to have an urg meet here on 7th July with the option of going down to Charlie's nursery on the 8th - people could probably take in the Eden Project that day, too but Charlie will give timings and directions for that! People who want to make it a bit of a holiday could perhaps, go on from Charlie's to Penzance and take the helicopter to Tresco the next day for a day or overnight trip. For those who'd like to come here, we have room in the car park for a couple or three caravans, as those who have been before will know; lunch is on us and the evenings are, as tour directors say, 'at liberty'. ;-) There are several good b&bs in and around this village and a very little further afield and there is plenty to see and do in the area generally. Our local pub is very good and there are other and excellent ones around here, too. If anyone who hopes to come wants to know about local accommodation, let me know. I've been in contact with Cormaic and they're going to try to make it if they can. Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. If you would like to join us, please email me or let me know here and if anyone has any food allergies, please nudge me nearer the time. I'll post a reminder a bit later, too. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) It sounds great and I would very much like to come. I wonder whether you have a small piece of ground I could camp on or whether you could recommend a camp-site nearby. Janet G |
urg meet
In message .com,
" writes On 28 Feb, 16:59, June Hughes wrote: In message . com, " writes On 28 Feb, 16:24, wrote: On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:20:54 GMT, Anne Jackson wrote: The message from Sacha contains these words: Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense! Contact Puce for bookings for the urg summer holiday in Aran in the Big Red Bus. I see our resident troll is back - for goodness sake what started out as an invitation to a meet has turned into one or two people grinding their own particular axes, we are all bored to death with it - give it a rest. Not necessarily, Judith. Two people were specifically excluded from the invitation. If you want to make someone feel uncomfortable, that is the way to do it. She could just as well have invited people by email and left it out of urg altogether. That way, those who were excluded didn't have to know about it and those she wanted to attend would. Instead of that, she broadcast it for all to see. Would you like it if it were you who were excluded? -- June Hughes- Hide quoted text - What do you mean by 'hide quoted text'? I had no quoted text. Why on earth should she invite by email, it is an urg meet and if certain people have offended her, then it is her right not to invite them. It is a meet of selected urg people, and therefore private. As already said, this is Usenet. I will be having an urg meet and again, there is a person that I would not like to see in my home. I have been to meets where an individual would not be welcome, this is life, we invite into our sitting rooms members of a group and if one or two are excluded, then too bad. If I had insulted anyone the way Sacha has been insulted, then I would be very surprised indeed if I were invited. This is my last word on the subject as all genuine urglers are sick to the teeth of this. Yes, I expect they are. I can't understand why you insist on carrying it on. -- June Hughes |
urg meet
On Feb 28, 5:28 pm, June Hughes
wrote: In message .com, " writes Would you like it if it were you who were excluded? -- June Hughes- Yes, I expect they are. I can't understand why you insist on carrying it on. -- June Hughes- That's a bit daft June as you asked me a question and I answered it!!! Judith |
urg meet
On 28/2/07 17:28, in article , "Janet
Galpin" wrote: The message from Sacha contains these words: I'm still hoping to have an urg meet here on 7th July with the option of going down to Charlie's nursery on the 8th - people could probably take in the Eden Project that day, too but Charlie will give timings and directions for that! snip It sounds great and I would very much like to come. I wonder whether you have a small piece of ground I could camp on or whether you could recommend a camp-site nearby. You'd be very welcome to camp on our field, as long as it's not too rain sodden for you. Do you mean tent or van because for a van there's a car park? It will be lovely to meet you, Janet and I'm so glad you're coming. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter