|
Access via Google
Just wondering if anyone else has to access this group via Google?
David Hill Abacus Nurseries. |
Access via Google
On 8 Mar, 14:59, "Dave Hill" wrote:
Just wondering if anyone else has to access this group via Google? I do. Why? |
Access via Google
On 8 Mar, 15:18, "La Puce" wrote:
On 8 Mar, 14:59, "Dave Hill" wrote: Just wondering if anyone else has to access this group via Google? I do. Why? Just wondering if there is any way to set a Killfile , I find that a lot of the things I could do in the past you can't do with Google David Hill |
Access via Google
On Mar 8, 5:59 pm, "Dave Hill" wrote:
Just wondering if there is any way to set a Killfile , I find that a lot of the things I could do in the past you can't do with Google David Hill I have that problem Dave, on Google. I have a second private server, Demon and it works fine on Turnpike. I also have a hospital computer but all newsgroups are unaccessible on there as are commercial sites so I don't need to set up a killfile as I can't access newsgroups, either to read or reply and that applies to all NHS staff throughout the UK. I have emailed Google to ask them if there is a way to set up a filter, if they say anything useful, I will email you. Judith |
Access via Google
"Dave Hill" wrote in message ups.com... Just wondering if anyone else has to access this group via Google? David Hill Abacus Nurseries. David -Are you accessing the newsgroup through Google because your isp (AOL?) does not have a news sever or one that carries uk.rec.gardening or is it a technical problem? Just nosey:-) |
Access via Google
On 8 Mar, 17:59, "Dave Hill" wrote:
Just wondering if there is any way to set a Killfile , I find that a lot of the things I could do in the past you can't do with Google No sadly. It's a pest. Especially at the moment when we seem to have a terrible lot of crossposts and trolls. I think it's just a matter, as far as you and I are concerned, to try to waddle through it all. It usually dissipate eventually. As long as nobody respond - they'll get bored. Starting new threads is also a good idea. It generates lots of posts from us and the crossposts/trolls eventually fall behind. When on Turnpike I could set killfile but not with google beta. Also I'm on Outlook - I could use urg via it, I just don't want to have it there all the time or I'll do no work!! ;o) |
Access via Google
"Dave Hill" wrote in message oups.com... On 8 Mar, 15:18, "La Puce" wrote: On 8 Mar, 14:59, "Dave Hill" wrote: Just wondering if anyone else has to access this group via Google? I do. Why? Just wondering if there is any way to set a Killfile , It was me mentioning my kill file that set off the present attack of troll lunacy in a few groups I frequent so beware :-) I don't know of any way to filter messages in Google though sorry. -- Chris, West Cork, Ireland. |
Access via Google
On 8 Mar, 19:43, "Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)" wrote:
"Dave Hill" wrote in message ups.com... Just wondering if anyone else has to access this group via Google? David Hill Abacus Nurseries. David -Are you accessing the newsgroup through Google because your isp (AOL?) does not have a news sever or one that carries uk.rec.gardening or is it a technical problem? Just nosey:-) Yes. AOL doesn't allow access to news groups. David Hill Abacus Nurseries |
Access via Google
In article .com, Dave
Hill writes On 8 Mar, 15:18, "La Puce" wrote: On 8 Mar, 14:59, "Dave Hill" wrote: Just wondering if anyone else has to access this group via Google? I do. Why? Just wondering if there is any way to set a Killfile , I find that a lot of the things I could do in the past you can't do with Google David Hill This is what it says on a couple of sites David ================================================== There are many web-based news services out there, including Google http://groups.google.com, NewsRanger http://www.newsranger.com, and so forth. For a complete listing, visit http://www.newsreaders.com. These are usually free services, and have the advantage of being complete and timely. They are searchable, and many people prefer to use them instead of a regular news service and separate reader, especially if the newsfeed offered by their ISP is slow or incomplete. The drawback is that they don't have filtering capabilities. From what I can see, there is no method for filtering out the posts you do not wish to see in web-based newsreaders. You can use the advanced search options to retrieve, say, all posts made to a specific group, but *without* specific words in them, such as "ninnyboy". If you use Google groups because your news server isn't very good, you may want to try contacting your ISP and telling them you're unhappy with their news service and that they need to beef it up ... or get a different ISP ... or sign up for a good service such as NewsGuy (relatively cheap). Otherwise, you're stuck without filtering, and have to do it "manually" by just skipping past the posts you don't wish to see. ================================================== ======== Or why not get something free like Agent or another newsreader? I wouldn't be without my killfile ability though some people tend to leave in the whole of the message text that they are replying to, which kind of defeats the object:) Janet -- Janet Tweedy Dalmatian Telegraph http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk |
Access via Google
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:35:44 +0000, Dave Hill wrote
(in article .com): On 8 Mar, 19:43, "Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)" wrote: "Dave Hill" wrote in message ups.com... Just wondering if anyone else has to access this group via Google? David Hill Abacus Nurseries. David -Are you accessing the newsgroup through Google because your isp (AOL?) does not have a news sever or one that carries uk.rec.gardening or is it a technical problem? Just nosey:-) Yes. AOL doesn't allow access to news groups. David, is there anything to prevent you using the German news server news.individual.net http://news.individual.net/? This is a stand-alone package, it used to be free and is now only 10 Euros a year but well worth while. You would then just need a newsreader - plenty out there, some free. -- Sally in Shropshire, UK bed and breakfast near Ludlow: http://www.stonybrook-ludlow.co.uk Burne-Jones/William Morris window in Shropshire church: http://www.whitton-stmarys.org.uk |
Access via Google
Mike Lyle wrote:
wrote: [...] I have emailed Google to ask them if there is a way to set up a filter, if they say anything useful, I will email you. The point about Google is that it's not a newsreader, it's an archive -- that is, a website where one can read a copy of Usenet. If you want to be able to killfile, you need a proper client-based newsreader, which will allow actions in your own computer. The inconvenient bit about setting up a newsreader is that you need to find a news _server_ to feed into the reader. Teranews is a very cheap one (a once-only payment of under four dollars); news.individual.net costs ten euro a year, but it's rather better. You can download a news client from the Web, or use Outlook Express, which comes free and automatically with Windows -- it's not brilliant, but it's good enough for most people. A small and decreasing number of ISPs run their own news servers for their customers. OE allows killfiling, which is pretty well essential for a group like URG which is under constant attack from trolls and egos. A better reader also allows you to killfile not just individuals but whole crossposted groups: OE's mechanism for this doesn't work, and there's no way M$ is going to make the effort to fix it. So, in short, no: GG of its nature can't support killfiles. PS. There are security "issues" with Outlook Express: a good reason to use something better if you feel up to the installation, but as long as you use it only for Usenet you won't come to harm. Also, note that Outlook Express and Outlook are completely different. Outlook is OK for email, but doesn't read news. -- Mike. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Access via Google
Mike Lyle writes
OE allows killfiling, which is pretty well essential for a group like URG which is under constant attack from trolls and egos. A better reader also allows you to killfile not just individuals but whole crossposted groups: Turnpike has built in rules to kill article (can't see the point), whole threads, particular subjects or particular posters, and you can create customised rules, for example to kill posts that are crossposted to more than a certain number of groups, or which are more than a particular length (eg 200 lines) -- Kay |
[or switch to an ISP, that fits in with the rest of the world?]
Martin[/quote] Or why not just access through Garden Banter - wots so wrong with it? I find it easy to use (you can quickly scroll through posts and replies) and if I don't want to read a particular person's reply/posting, I just ignore it. I sort of know the longer a thread generally, the 'worse' it gets so I don't read those, or skip to the last post to see how its developed. I'm just a beginner gardener so I tend to read more than respond, but I've learnt an awful lot, laughed a lot (especially when Sacha is/was on good form) and would like to think I still belong, despite accessing through Gardenbanter. I have tried accessing URG through a newsgroup twice, but each time, despite our excellent anti-virus protection, something got through leading to major repair. So I'm sticking to Garden Banter.... |
Access via Google
"Sally Thompson" wrote in message al.net... On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:35:44 +0000, Dave Hill wrote (in article .com): On 8 Mar, 19:43, "Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)" wrote: "Dave Hill" wrote in message ups.com... Just wondering if anyone else has to access this group via Google? David Hill Abacus Nurseries. David -Are you accessing the newsgroup through Google because your isp (AOL?) does not have a news sever or one that carries uk.rec.gardening or is it a technical problem? Just nosey:-) Yes. AOL doesn't allow access to news groups. David, is there anything to prevent you using the German news server news.individual.net http://news.individual.net/? This is a stand-alone package, it used to be free and is now only 10 Euros a year but well worth while. You would then just need a newsreader - plenty out there, some free. -- Sally in Shropshire, UK bed and breakfast near Ludlow: http://www.stonybrook-ludlow.co.uk Burne-Jones/William Morris window in Shropshire church: http://www.whitton-stmarys.org.uk I switched to them after years of missing posts with tiscalli and I must say its been very good since, not quite free but almost! -- Charlie, gardening in Cornwall. http://www.roselandhouse.co.uk Holders of National Plant Collections of Clematis viticella (cvs) and Lapageria rosea |
I agree, with Jay Jay much easier to log in from your normal web browser,
you can then see the latest topics and read them or not as you wish. |
Access via Google
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:27:14 +0000, K wrote
(in article ): Mike Lyle writes OE allows killfiling, which is pretty well essential for a group like URG which is under constant attack from trolls and egos. A better reader also allows you to killfile not just individuals but whole crossposted groups: Turnpike has built in rules to kill article (can't see the point), whole threads, particular subjects or particular posters, and you can create customised rules, for example to kill posts that are crossposted to more than a certain number of groups, or which are more than a particular length (eg 200 lines) The one I use, Hogwasher (Mac only) has a similar arrangement. It is particularly useful to killfile the trolls that crosspost to umpteen groups, and you can also killfile the ones that are crossposted to a particular group. It also has a rule to keep the filter permanently, or delete it if unused for (n) days - particularly useful against the morons that continually change their identity, and saves the killfile from growing enormously. I occasionally use Google Groups to look up something in a group which I don't subscribe to, nor wish to subscribe to, but I personally find the whole usenet experience so much better through a proper newsreader. -- Sally in Shropshire, UK bed and breakfast near Ludlow: http://www.stonybrook-ludlow.co.uk Burne-Jones/William Morris window in Shropshire church: http://www.whitton-stmarys.org.uk |
Access via Google
On Mar 9, 9:56 pm, "Mike Lyle"
wrote: Mike Lyle wrote: wrote: [...] I have emailed Google to ask them if there is a way to set up a filter, if they say anything useful, I will email you. The point about Google is that it's not a newsreader, it's an archive -- that is, a website where one can read a copy of Usenet. If you want to be able to killfile, you need a proper client-based newsreader, which will allow actions in your own computer. The inconvenient bit about setting up a newsreader is that you need to find a news _server_ to feed into the reader. Teranews is a very cheap one (a once-only payment of under four dollars); news.individual.net costs ten euro a year, but it's rather better. You can download a news client from the Web, or use Outlook Express, which comes free and automatically with Windows -- it's not brilliant, but it's good enough for most people. A small and decreasing number of ISPs run their own news servers for their customers. OE allows killfiling, which is pretty well essential for a group like URG which is under constant attack from trolls and egos. A better reader also allows you to killfile not just individuals but whole crossposted groups: OE's mechanism for this doesn't work, and there's no way M$ is going to make the effort to fix it. So, in short, no: GG of its nature can't support killfiles. PS. There are security "issues" with Outlook Express: a good reason to use something better if you feel up to the installation, but as long as you use it only for Usenet you won't come to harm. Also, note that Outlook Express and Outlook are completely different. Outlook is OK for email, but doesn't read news. -- Mike. -- Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me. A great result so hopefully the trolling on this group by that person will now stop, the insults to others, the lies and the foul language Unfortunately it won't stop the bad gardening advice, but I can live with that. Judith |
Access via Google
On 10 Mar, 12:03, "
wrote: Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me. What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot. I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will then be more serious than you would have ever expected. So let it rest once and for all. |
Access via Google
On 10/3/07 12:21, in article
, "La Puce" wrote: On 10 Mar, 12:03, " wrote: Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me. What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot. I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will then be more serious than you would have ever expected. I don't think your 'colleague' as you grandly refer to the senior director of URBED London, considered it a laughing matter. His reply to me indicated as much. Try it on once more with me and I'll have a lawyer onto you for harassment so fast, it will make your eyes water. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
Access via Google
On Mar 10, 12:21 pm, "La Puce" wrote:
On 10 Mar, 12:03, " wrote: Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me. What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot. I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will then be more serious than you would have ever expected. So let it rest once and for all. I have no idea what you are on about, Sacha's letter??? I am talking about the letter that Nic Falk sent to your husband, a copy of which I have. Mrs. Rudlin I don't have to say anymore, you know the truth of the matter and so does everyone who matters on urg, your lying days are done. You are now a figure of fun. Judith |
Access via Google
In message m,
" writes On Mar 10, 12:21 pm, "La Puce" wrote: On 10 Mar, 12:03, " wrote: Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me. What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot. I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will then be more serious than you would have ever expected. So let it rest once and for all. I have no idea what you are on about, Sacha's letter??? I am talking about the letter that Nic Falk sent to your husband, a copy of which I have. Mrs. Rudlin I don't have to say anymore, you know the truth of the matter and so does everyone who matters on urg, your lying days are done. You are now a figure of fun. Perhaps you would like to take this to email? It has no place here. Then maybe we can pick up the remnants of what used to be a good ng before people like Alan Gould left. -- June Hughes |
Access via Google
"June Hughes" wrote in message
... Perhaps you would like to take this to email? It has no place here. Then maybe we can pick up the remnants of what used to be a good ng before people like Alan Gould left. -- June Hughes No, please don't, especially as Sacha has returned. Mike -- .................................................. ......... Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association www.rnshipmates.co.uk www.nsrafa.com |
Access via Google
On 10 Mar, 12:37, Sacha wrote:
I don't think your 'colleague' as you grandly refer to the senior director of URBED London, considered it a laughing matter. His reply to me indicated as much. Try it on once more with me and I'll have a lawyer onto you for harassment so fast, it will make your eyes water. I've seen your letter, the publicly funded bit, the worst advertisement, the professionals and journalists posting here, you being the longest poster on urg blablahbla... What a lot of rubbish. I cannot remember having a row with Charlie, nor Trevor, both quite more professional than you. You're a liar and a silly woman but I will grant you the last word because I pity you. So there, have it Sacha Hubbard, have it all. |
Access via Google
On 10 Mar, 13:42, wrote:
I don't think your 'colleague' as you grandly refer to the senior director of URBED London, considered it a laughing matter. His reply to me indicated as much. Try it on once more with me and I'll have a lawyer onto you for harassment so fast, it will make your eyes water. I've seen your letter, the publicly funded bit, the worst advertisement, the professionals and journalists posting here, you being the longest poster on urg blablahbla... What a lot of rubbish. I cannot remember having a row with Charlie, nor Trevor, both quite more professional than you. You're a liar and a silly woman but I will grant you the last word because I pity you. So there, have it Sacha Hubbard, have it all. David wanted to say something then changed his mind. I hadn't realised I was still on his addy. Still, we both couldn't care less. We've repeatedly asked you not to meniton us - but you still carry on. We just don't understand why. |
Access via Google
On 10/3/07 12:54, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote: In message m, " writes On Mar 10, 12:21 pm, "La Puce" wrote: On 10 Mar, 12:03, " wrote: Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me. What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot. I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will then be more serious than you would have ever expected. So let it rest once and for all. I have no idea what you are on about, Sacha's letter??? I am talking about the letter that Nic Falk sent to your husband, a copy of which I have. Mrs. Rudlin I don't have to say anymore, you know the truth of the matter and so does everyone who matters on urg, your lying days are done. You are now a figure of fun. Perhaps you would like to take this to email? It has no place here. Then maybe we can pick up the remnants of what used to be a good ng before people like Alan Gould left. I'm sorry June but under no circumstances would I email Helene Rudlin or allow her to email me. Once a person with bad intentions has someone's email headers, they can alter the content of the email to anything they want to say. And as Helene has roundly abused her position both at work and on this group to harass me and Judith Lea, it is right that the group should know what she gets up to, both on and off group. It would be rather more to the point if we heard your voice condemning her disgusting behaviour, something that has yet to happen, rather than appearing to want to sweep it under the mat. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
Access via Google
On 10/3/07 13:42, in article
, " wrote: On 10 Mar, 12:37, Sacha wrote: I don't think your 'colleague' as you grandly refer to the senior director of URBED London, considered it a laughing matter. His reply to me indicated as much. Try it on once more with me and I'll have a lawyer onto you for harassment so fast, it will make your eyes water. I've seen your letter, the publicly funded bit, the worst advertisement, the professionals and journalists posting here, you being the longest poster on urg blablahbla... What a lot of rubbish. I cannot remember having a row with Charlie, nor Trevor, both quite more professional than you. You're a liar and a silly woman but I will grant you the last word because I pity you. So there, have it Sacha Hubbard, have it all. Pathetic. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
Access via Google
On 10/3/07 13:56, in article
, "La Puce" wrote: On 10 Mar, 13:42, wrote: I don't think your 'colleague' as you grandly refer to the senior director of URBED London, considered it a laughing matter. His reply to me indicated as much. Try it on once more with me and I'll have a lawyer onto you for harassment so fast, it will make your eyes water. I've seen your letter, the publicly funded bit, the worst advertisement, the professionals and journalists posting here, you being the longest poster on urg blablahbla... What a lot of rubbish. I cannot remember having a row with Charlie, nor Trevor, both quite more professional than you. You're a liar and a silly woman but I will grant you the last word because I pity you. So there, have it Sacha Hubbard, have it all. David wanted to say something then changed his mind. I hadn't realised I was still on his addy. Still, we both couldn't care less. We've repeatedly asked you not to meniton us - but you still carry on. We just don't understand why. Look back over your posts of the last few days into which you continually drag my name. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
Access via Google
On 10 Mar, 14:54, Sacha wrote:
I'm sorry June but under no circumstances would I email Helene Rudlin But you did, last sunday at 15.46 subject title 'My Family'. I didn't responded though. Forwarded to you June. |
Access via Google
On Mar 10, 12:54 pm, June Hughes
wrote: In message m, " writes On Mar 10, 12:21 pm, "La Puce" wrote: On 10 Mar, 12:03, " wrote: Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me. What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot. I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will then be more serious than you would have ever expected. So let it rest once and for all. I have no idea what you are on about, Sacha's letter??? I am talking about the letter that Nic Falk sent to your husband, a copy of which I have. Mrs. Rudlin I don't have to say anymore, you know the truth of the matter and so does everyone who matters on urg, your lying days are done. You are now a figure of fun. Perhaps you would like to take this to email? It has no place here. Then maybe we can pick up the remnants of what used to be a good ng before people like Alan Gould left. -- June Hughes- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Your comments may have been more accurate if you had added "used to be a good newsgroup before La Puce joined in". I am sure you read the comments of all the well respected gardeners putting her right about matters? If you feel that you must comment on this posting, then may I respectfully request that you take it to email. Judith |
Access via Google
On Mar 10, 2:54 pm, Sacha wrote:
On 10/3/07 12:54, in article , "June Hughes" wrote: In message m, " writes On Mar 10, 12:21 pm, "La Puce" wrote: On 10 Mar, 12:03, " wrote: Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me. What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot. I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will then be more serious than you would have ever expected. So let it rest once and for all. I have no idea what you are on about, Sacha's letter??? I am talking about the letter that Nic Falk sent to your husband, a copy of which I have. Mrs. Rudlin I don't have to say anymore, you know the truth of the matter and so does everyone who matters on urg, your lying days are done. You are now a figure of fun. Perhaps you would like to take this to email? It has no place here. Then maybe we can pick up the remnants of what used to be a good ng before people like Alan Gould left. I'm sorry June but under no circumstances would I email Helene Rudlin or allow her to email me. Once a person with bad intentions has someone's email headers, they can alter the content of the email to anything they want to say. And as Helene has roundly abused her position both at work and on this group to harass me and Judith Lea, it is right that the group should know what she gets up to, both on and off group. It would be rather more to the point if we heard your voice condemning her disgusting behaviour, something that has yet to happen, rather than appearing to want to sweep it under the mat. -- Sachahttp://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devonhttp://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Unfortunately this now fits in with La Puce's claims last October - and now it seems La Puce is sending June alleged emails that you have allegedly sent to her, why send them to June??? What a shame as I had given June the benefit of the doubt. Judith Judith |
Access via Google
On 10/3/07 15:09, in article
, "La Puce" wrote: On 10 Mar, 14:54, Sacha wrote: I'm sorry June but under no circumstances would I email Helene Rudlin But you did, last sunday at 15.46 subject title 'My Family'. I didn't responded though. Forwarded to you June. That wasn't correspondence. That was a declaration of intent. From: Subject: My famiy Date: 4 March 2007 15:36:25 GMT To: One more personal remark from you about me or my family and another complaint about your vicious behaviour will go straight to URBED.** -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk I wonder why you feel it necessary to forward emails to June? Is June Puce's apologist or would Puce like us to think that, perhaps? And I wonder whether what she received is what I sent. No matter, the warning stands and my intentions are clear. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
Access via Google
On 10 Mar, 16:14, Sacha wrote:
That wasn't correspondence. That was a declaration of intent. Leave it for crying out loud, JUST LEAVE IT!!! You said you wouldn't dream of emailing me. I responded by saying you did. Now you said it wasn't but a declaration. Go away please leave us alone. |
Access via Google
On 10/3/07 16:25, in article
, "La Puce" wrote: On 10 Mar, 16:14, Sacha wrote: That wasn't correspondence. That was a declaration of intent. Leave it for crying out loud, JUST LEAVE IT!!! You said you wouldn't dream of emailing me. I responded by saying you did. Now you said it wasn't but a declaration. Go away please leave us alone. Leave my family alone and I will leave you alone. Do not come near this place again. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
Access via Google
On 10 Mar, 16:07, "
wrote: Unfortunately this now fits in with La Puce's claims last October - and now it seems La Puce is sending June alleged emails that you have allegedly sent to her, why send them to June??? My god. Do you actually hold a job?! Sacha said that under no circumstances she would email me, and she said that to June. So I replied that she did, on Sunday and that I will forward that email to June since it's June that asked about taking it to email. Is this *that* difficult to understand? Now Sacha has posted it, saying it wasn't an email but a declaration ... But I won't even go into this. It's beyond ridiculous now. You ladies have far too much time on your hands it seems. |
Access via Google
In message .com, La
Puce writes On 10 Mar, 14:54, Sacha wrote: I'm sorry June but under no circumstances would I email Helene Rudlin But you did, last sunday at 15.46 subject title 'My Family'. I didn't responded though. Forwarded to you June. I don't recall seeing Sacha's post of 10 March saying anything to me. Nor do I recall posting anything requiring such a reply from her. However, I have been out all day, so I may have missed it. (For a start, she would not say 'I'm sorry' to me.) Looks as though the post may be a forgery by one of the trolls like the one pretending to be Chris. -- June Hughes |
Access via Google
In message .com,
" writes On Mar 10, 2:54 pm, Sacha wrote: On 10/3/07 12:54, in article , "June Hughes" wrote: In message m, " writes On Mar 10, 12:21 pm, "La Puce" wrote: On 10 Mar, 12:03, " wrote: Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me. What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot. I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will then be more serious than you would have ever expected. So let it rest once and for all. I have no idea what you are on about, Sacha's letter??? I am talking about the letter that Nic Falk sent to your husband, a copy of which I have. Mrs. Rudlin I don't have to say anymore, you know the truth of the matter and so does everyone who matters on urg, your lying days are done. You are now a figure of fun. Perhaps you would like to take this to email? It has no place here. Then maybe we can pick up the remnants of what used to be a good ng before people like Alan Gould left. I'm sorry June but under no circumstances would I email Helene Rudlin or allow her to email me. Once a person with bad intentions has someone's email headers, they can alter the content of the email to anything they want to say. And as Helene has roundly abused her position both at work and on this group to harass me and Judith Lea, it is right that the group should know what she gets up to, both on and off group. It would be rather more to the point if we heard your voice condemning her disgusting behaviour, something that has yet to happen, rather than appearing to want to sweep it under the mat. -- Sachahttp://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devonhttp://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Unfortunately this now fits in with La Puce's claims last October - and now it seems La Puce is sending June alleged emails that you have allegedly sent to her, why send them to June??? What a shame as I had given June the benefit of the doubt. Oh for goodness sake. Get a grip. I received an email from Puce this evening when I returned from a pleasant day out. I did not encourage this email and furthermore am not interested in any of your bitchy little squabbles. I am surprised to see Sacha posting 'I am sorry June' to me and have already posted a reply to Puce's posting saying I thought it may be a forgery. I was not addressing Sacha in my post - I was addressing you. Are you really as thick as you make out? As for your munificent 'benefit of the doubt' - I want nothing more to do with you and had already kill-filed you in ukfd. Now kindly go and get on with your life and try not to be as stupid as you make out. Just leave me alone. -- June Hughes |
Access via Google
In message m,
" writes On Mar 10, 12:54 pm, June Hughes wrote: In message m, " writes On Mar 10, 12:21 pm, "La Puce" wrote: On 10 Mar, 12:03, " wrote: Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me. What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot. I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will then be more serious than you would have ever expected. So let it rest once and for all. I have no idea what you are on about, Sacha's letter??? I am talking about the letter that Nic Falk sent to your husband, a copy of which I have. Mrs. Rudlin I don't have to say anymore, you know the truth of the matter and so does everyone who matters on urg, your lying days are done. You are now a figure of fun. Perhaps you would like to take this to email? It has no place here. Then maybe we can pick up the remnants of what used to be a good ng before people like Alan Gould left. -- June Hughes- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Your comments may have been more accurate if you had added "used to be a good newsgroup before La Puce joined in". I am sure you read the comments of all the well respected gardeners putting her right about matters? If you feel that you must comment on this posting, then may I respectfully request that you take it to email. You really are as thick as you make out. -- June Hughes |
Access via Google
On Mar 10, 8:24 pm, June Hughes
wrote: In message .com, Oh for goodness sake. Get a grip. I received an email from Puce this evening when I returned from a pleasant day out. I did not encourage this email and furthermore am not interested in any of your bitchy little squabbles. I am surprised to see Sacha posting 'I am sorry June' to me and have already posted a reply to Puce's posting saying I thought it may be a forgery. I was not addressing Sacha in my post - I was addressing you. Are you really as thick as you make out? As for your munificent 'benefit of the doubt' - I want nothing more to do with you and had already kill-filed you in ukfd. Now kindly go and get on with your life and try not to be as stupid as you make out. Just leave me alone. -- June Hughes- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Really June, then it's a good job that I have kept all yoiur emails isn''t it, you have played your last card and shown your hand, what a miserable two faced person you are, as for killfiling me, good, I wouldn't want to associate with anything like you,or your like you have ben caught out, yet again and as for taking it to email, it's pity you didn't take your own advice especially the whining email you sent wheedling an invite to Sacha's meet, now sod off. |
Access via Google
On Mar 10, 8:24 pm, June Hughes
wrote: In message m, " writes On Mar 10, 12:54 pm, June Hughes wrote: In message m, " writes On Mar 10, 12:21 pm, "La Puce" wrote: On 10 Mar, 12:03, " wrote: Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me. What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot. I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will then be more serious than you would have ever expected. So let it rest once and for all. I have no idea what you are on about, Sacha's letter??? I am talking about the letter that Nic Falk sent to your husband, a copy of which I have. Mrs. Rudlin I don't have to say anymore, you know the truth of the matter and so does everyone who matters on urg, your lying days are done. You are now a figure of fun. Perhaps you would like to take this to email? It has no place here. Then maybe we can pick up the remnants of what used to be a good ng before people like Alan Gould left. -- June Hughes- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Your comments may have been more accurate if you had added "used to be a good newsgroup before La Puce joined in". I am sure you read the comments of all the well respected gardeners putting her right about matters? If you feel that you must comment on this posting, then may I respectfully request that you take it to email. You really are as thick as you make out. -- June Hughes- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not quite so thick that I can't see what you are, everyone has been right about you all along. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter