|
Sacha Hubbard
Here a selection of your favourite rants Sacha Queen of Usenet. Your
majesty, I though to give you some of the treatment you give others. But these below are all true, written by you to others and one wonders indeed where you get the time and how do you manage to carry so much evil in you. For those of you who want to read more, and I don't blame you because it does beat Eastenders, here's the link to many more. Have a nice winter everyone, enjoy the reading! http://groups.google.co.uk/groups/se...30&sa=N&hl=en& http://groups.google.co.uk/groups/se...90&sa=N&hl=en& Danny wrote: Danny. I called the police - I made a formal complaint against Mrs Sacha Hubbard. They took all the information, I faxed them all the information I have. While there not be much they can do, it is on file in here area of residence. I was assured the matter will be looked into as Mrs Hubbard involved a child in her personal attacks on someone. I faxed all the information to two local newspapers. I strongly suggest nobody makes any more comments on this subject in this newsgroup, ignore it, it is in the hands of the police now, let them deal with it. Thank you. Danny. The police departments in the areas the alleged children were photographed will investigate in order to protect the children . I have given the names of all the people who are and who may be involved My name is Sacha Hubbard. Nobody calls me Sandra but if it amuses you, you pathetic little man........my original nom de net was 'Morley', a name I borrowed from my late lamented wire haired dachshund. When I changed from Morley to Sacha I announced it quite clearly but you and your rubbishy 'friends' have always fudged that, too. SO - Perhaps you would be honest and courageous enough to post your real name here. Be a 'man' Julie, show us your round and wobbly bits, assuming you have some. Don't hide behind a pseudonym while you bully, slander, libel and harass; surely you're sufficiently convinced of your rectitude to post your real, full name? GO ON - you know you can do it - give it a go. You'll feel heaps better - just like a dose of Enos to your grubby little soul. So - Julie baby, who are you? Why don't you have the guts to post with your real name? Are you ashamed of your claptrap 'opinions' and lies? Don't you believe they deserve genuine accreditation? Or are you in fact aware that you are a lying, snivelling, libellous, cowardly shit of the first water, backed up only by more of that ilk? Is that why you don't have the guts to post your real name? Of course it is. Post your real name here and put it to your posts about me and others. I dare you to do so, just as I use my name. Do it, you lily livered *******. Be the 'man' your braggadocio declaims you to be. Or shall we know that you're all **** and wind? Looks like it - no guts to proclaim your real ID - no credibility, Julie. I think you've done this one before or something similar. It's a sign of desperation when people start to repeat themselves, you know. Maybe in your case, Alzheimer's or maybe just - pathetic old loser? -- Sacha (remove the weeds to email me) 1/6/05 19:36, in article . com, "Lux" wrote: And what does ANY of this have to do with PK? Rather a lot. Su-T trots along behind all PK's nastiness like some little toy dog. This behaviour now is akin to her bizarre actions when I had to serve a Cease & Desist letter on PK. Su-T, who was in no way involved in the matter, actually emailed my lawyer, using her pseudonym, to ask him if I was in fact, his client. She actually expected him to hand out information on me to an uninvolved third party, who was emailing him anonymously! She was in no way implicated in the matter that led to the sending of that letter, and she is in no way involved - by me - in anything happening on agr now. It is a long time since I have responded to Su-T, so her posting of my family's information on here is harassment and stalking and is calculated to cause me distress and I am treating it accordingly. It is ridiculous of her to claim she is doing it so that the police don't approach the wrong person, because, even if the police were involved in someone sending me PK's totally innocuous photograph it is absolutely nothing to do with Su-T and I have not discussed the matter with her. Despite the fact that I have never posted the names of any of their families on here, Su-T (and often, by association, PK) appears to think it's just fine to do that to mine and in this instance, Su-T is going to be the one carrying the can for that. I have taken the necessary action over it and what that is I'm keeping to myself. Both PK and Su-T need to remember that while I wouldn't *dream* of posting details of their actual addresses, family members' names, photos etc. on here, others might not be so considerate. Both of them have made enough enemies to last most people a lifetime and Su-T, in particular, has a posting trail, including details of her incarceration in a mental hospital, her feuds with legal and medical personnel and her own family, going back a very long way. She has written some very disturbing stuff about what she would like to happen to children that broke into a house where she was storing her things and IMO, it shows a potential for violence that is terrifying. I'm not having this sort of person pursuing me. And for what it's worth, IMO, all this from Su-T is an attempt to avenge PK for someone sending me an unsolicited photograph of PK by email. Despite the accusations and obfuscations being flung around here, I have NOT sent that photo on by email, nor has it been transmitted by any other method and I have decided that I shall never do so. PK is lucky that she selects well those she chooses to fight with. Some of her other and earlier enemies would have plastered it on billboards 10 feet high by now. -- Sacha (remove the weeds for email) Either you are as big a liar as your Leader or you are a moronic fool. On the assumption that you could be either, given your posting history, I will point out to you and the group that when I wrote that, PK had spent days ferreting around the internet, trying to prove I was *not* the mother of the 10th Earl of Jersey, and that the person on ATR who had congratulated me on my son's engagement was mistaken that his mother is me, and that she had tried to show that I was not, in fact, married to my first husband, though why that mattered to her, heaven alone knows. She went into envy overdrive and sent post after post after post, asking others for information to prove that the poster to atr was mistaken and that I was not WHO I HAD NEVER SAID I WAS. Until that point of her anxious, jealous, manic digging, nobody on this group knew from my postings that my son is the 10th Earl of Jersey. She and the people who then emailed her the information are the ones responsible for that appearing here and forcing me into replying to avert embarrassment to the member of atr who was profuse in their apologies to me for letting PK loose and, in my own naivete in the hope that the admission from me would put the matter to rest, where it belongs. My children are not royalty and thus are not relevant to this group unless royal matters somehow involve them. I should have known better, I admit. PK has *never* recovered from that blow - she is seething with fury and jealousy because having spent years, dismissing my knowledge of some aspects of British life that she will never know anything about, the proof that she was dead wrong was staring her in the face. She hasn't been able to let the matter rest ever since, which is why you have been primed like a leaky pump and aimed in my direction. And - please - don't try to pretend otherwise to this group. Too many of us have seen PK's string-pulling for too many years to believe you are acting entirely under your own volition. If there is any action to be taken against you in the future, PK will most certainly be implicated in it. Once, *many* years ago, I made a slip and posted as Sacha Villiers when normally I posted as 'Morley' and of course, one of the sweet little things here was onto it like a knife and started this whole ball rolling, even that long ago. PK wasn't even around then but I do know about the emails that went around and I know about them from people who received them, so lying won't work. You, Danny are not very good at this sort of research and I suggest you give it up. You have posted one lot of just slightly off information after another and all you are doing is proving to this group what a spiteful fool you are and how incapable of following genealogical information, just like Phyllis, who didn't even know what 'associated' meant and who took Hull as gospel - something that even the owner of that site didn't claim for it! He was shocked and I'd say, contemptuous of PK's claims, when I wrote to him, asking him to update the site after PK's meddling. He hadn't realised ignorant fools of her type were using his site to berate and insult others. Now, you can carry on like this until doomsday, quite frankly. All you are is a bore. If harm comes to my family because of you, you will take the consequences and yes, I have taken steps to ensure that. In the meantime, post as much drivel as you wish. You chop it around so selectively, you omit the malice of PK so deliberately, you make mistakes so ignorantly, that to be frank, you are welcome to witter on to the three or four people who bother with you. From now on, into the kill file with you, you mammoth bore. Finally, may I point out to you that this is a royalty group and that as my family and I are not royal, we have no place in lengthy and really rather dull discussions of this sort. PK has spent years threatening me with disclosure of my family's history but being under a legal warning from me, she has incited you and the vicious Su-T to do her dirty work for her. Both will take the consequences, along with you, if any manic lurker here acts upon the information you have given them. You have put some members of my family in particular, in real danger and believe me, you're going to know about that if anything happens. -- Sacha (remove the weeds for email) Either you are as big a liar as your Leader or you are a moronic fool. On the assumption that you could be either, given your posting history, I will point out to you and the group that when I wrote that, PK had spent days ferreting around the internet, trying to prove I was *not* the mother of the 10th Earl of Jersey, and that the person on ATR who had congratulated me on my son's engagement was mistaken that his mother is me, and that she had tried to show that I was not, in fact, married to my first husband, though why that mattered to her, heaven alone knows. She went into envy overdrive and sent post after post after post, asking others for information to prove that the poster to atr was mistaken and that I was not WHO I HAD NEVER SAID I WAS. Until that point of her anxious, jealous, manic digging, nobody on this group knew from my postings that my son is the 10th Earl of Jersey. She and the people who then emailed her the information are the ones responsible for that appearing here and forcing me into replying to avert embarrassment to the member of atr who was profuse in their apologies to me for letting PK loose and, in my own naivete in the hope that the admission from me would put the matter to rest, where it belongs. My children are not royalty and thus are not relevant to this group unless royal matters somehow involve them. I should have known better, I admit. PK has *never* recovered from that blow - she is seething with fury and jealousy because having spent years, dismissing my knowledge of some aspects of British life that she will never know anything about, the proof that she was dead wrong was staring her in the face. She hasn't been able to let the matter rest ever since, which is why you have been primed like a leaky pump and aimed in my direction. And - please - don't try to pretend otherwise to this group. Too many of us have seen PK's string-pulling for too many years to believe you are acting entirely under your own volition. If there is any action to be taken against you in the future, PK will most certainly be implicated in it. Once, *many* years ago, I made a slip and posted as Sacha Villiers when normally I posted as 'Morley' and of course, one of the sweet little things here was onto it like a knife and started this whole ball rolling, even that long ago. PK wasn't even around then but I do know about the emails that went around and I know about them from people who received them, so lying won't work. You, Danny are not very good at this sort of research and I suggest you give it up. You have posted one lot of just slightly off information after another and all you are doing is proving to this group what a spiteful fool you are and how incapable of following genealogical information, just like Phyllis, who didn't even know what 'associated' meant and who took Hull as gospel - something that even the owner of that site didn't claim for it! He was shocked and I'd say, contemptuous of PK's claims, when I wrote to him, asking him to update the site after PK's meddling. He hadn't realised ignorant fools of her type were using his site to berate and insult others. Now, you can carry on like this until doomsday, quite frankly. All you are is a bore. If harm comes to my family because of you, you will take the consequences and yes, I have taken steps to ensure that. In the meantime, post as much drivel as you wish. You chop it around so selectively, you omit the malice of PK so deliberately, you make mistakes so ignorantly, that to be frank, you are welcome to witter on to the three or four people who bother with you. From now on, into the kill file with you, you mammoth bore. Finally, may I point out to you that this is a royalty group and that as my family and I are not royal, we have no place in lengthy and really rather dull discussions of this sort. PK has spent years threatening me with disclosure of my family's history but being under a legal warning from me, she has incited you and the vicious Su-T to do her dirty work for her. Both will take the consequences, along with you, if any manic lurker here acts upon the information you have given them. You have put some members of my family in particular, in real danger and believe me, you're going to know about that if anything happens. -- Sacha (remove the weeds for email) Either you are as big a liar as your Leader or you are a moronic fool. On the assumption that you could be either, given your posting history, I will point out to you and the group that when I wrote that, PK had spent days ferreting around the internet, trying to prove I was *not* the mother of the 10th Earl of Jersey, and that the person on ATR who had congratulated me on my son's engagement was mistaken that his mother is me, and that she had tried to show that I was not, in fact, married to my first husband, though why that mattered to her, heaven alone knows. She went into envy overdrive and sent post after post after post, asking others for information to prove that the poster to atr was mistaken and that I was not WHO I HAD NEVER SAID I WAS. Until that point of her anxious, jealous, manic digging, nobody on this group knew from my postings that my son is the 10th Earl of Jersey. She and the people who then emailed her the information are the ones responsible for that appearing here and forcing me into replying to avert embarrassment to the member of atr who was profuse in their apologies to me for letting PK loose and, in my own naivete in the hope that the admission from me would put the matter to rest, where it belongs. My children are not royalty and thus are not relevant to this group unless royal matters somehow involve them. I should have known better, I admit. PK has *never* recovered from that blow - she is seething with fury and jealousy because having spent years, dismissing my knowledge of some aspects of British life that she will never know anything about, the proof that she was dead wrong was staring her in the face. She hasn't been able to let the matter rest ever since, which is why you have been primed like a leaky pump and aimed in my direction. And - please - don't try to pretend otherwise to this group. Too many of us have seen PK's string-pulling for too many years to believe you are acting entirely under your own volition. If there is any action to be taken against you in the future, PK will most certainly be implicated in it. Once, *many* years ago, I made a slip and posted as Sacha Villiers when normally I posted as 'Morley' and of course, one of the sweet little things here was onto it like a knife and started this whole ball rolling, even that long ago. PK wasn't even around then but I do know about the emails that went around and I know about them from people who received them, so lying won't work. You, Danny are not very good at this sort of research and I suggest you give it up. You have posted one lot of just slightly off information after another and all you are doing is proving to this group what a spiteful fool you are and how incapable of following genealogical information, just like Phyllis, who didn't even know what 'associated' meant and who took Hull as gospel - something that even the owner of that site didn't claim for it! He was shocked and I'd say, contemptuous of PK's claims, when I wrote to him, asking him to update the site after PK's meddling. He hadn't realised ignorant fools of her type were using his site to berate and insult others. Now, you can carry on like this until doomsday, quite frankly. All you are is a bore. If harm comes to my family because of you, you will take the consequences and yes, I have taken steps to ensure that. In the meantime, post as much drivel as you wish. You chop it around so selectively, you omit the malice of PK so deliberately, you make mistakes so ignorantly, that to be frank, you are welcome to witter on to the three or four people who bother with you. From now on, into the kill file with you, you mammoth bore. Finally, may I point out to you that this is a royalty group and that as my family and I are not royal, we have no place in lengthy and really rather dull discussions of this sort. PK has spent years threatening me with disclosure of my family's history but being under a legal warning from me, she has incited you and the vicious Su-T to do her dirty work for her. Both will take the consequences, along with you, if any manic lurker here acts upon the information you have given them. You have put some members of my family in particular, in real danger and believe me, you're going to know about that if anything happens. -- Sacha (remove the weeds for email) Either you are as big a liar as your Leader or you are a moronic fool. On the assumption that you could be either, given your posting history, I will point out to you and the group that when I wrote that, PK had spent days ferreting around the internet, trying to prove I was *not* the mother of the 10th Earl of Jersey, and that the person on ATR who had congratulated me on my son's engagement was mistaken that his mother is me, and that she had tried to show that I was not, in fact, married to my first husband, though why that mattered to her, heaven alone knows. She went into envy overdrive and sent post after post after post, asking others for information to prove that the poster to atr was mistaken and that I was not WHO I HAD NEVER SAID I WAS. Until that point of her anxious, jealous, manic digging, nobody on this group knew from my postings that my son is the 10th Earl of Jersey. She and the people who then emailed her the information are the ones responsible for that appearing here and forcing me into replying to avert embarrassment to the member of atr who was profuse in their apologies to me for letting PK loose and, in my own naivete in the hope that the admission from me would put the matter to rest, where it belongs. My children are not royalty and thus are not relevant to this group unless royal matters somehow involve them. I should have known better, I admit. PK has *never* recovered from that blow - she is seething with fury and jealousy because having spent years, dismissing my knowledge of some aspects of British life that she will never know anything about, the proof that she was dead wrong was staring her in the face. She hasn't been able to let the matter rest ever since, which is why you have been primed like a leaky pump and aimed in my direction. And - please - don't try to pretend otherwise to this group. Too many of us have seen PK's string-pulling for too many years to believe you are acting entirely under your own volition. If there is any action to be taken against you in the future, PK will most certainly be implicated in it. Once, *many* years ago, I made a slip and posted as Sacha Villiers when normally I posted as 'Morley' and of course, one of the sweet little things here was onto it like a knife and started this whole ball rolling, even that long ago. PK wasn't even around then but I do know about the emails that went around and I know about them from people who received them, so lying won't work. You, Danny are not very good at this sort of research and I suggest you give it up. You have posted one lot of just slightly off information after another and all you are doing is proving to this group what a spiteful fool you are and how incapable of following genealogical information, just like Phyllis, who didn't even know what 'associated' meant and who took Hull as gospel - something that even the owner of that site didn't claim for it! He was shocked and I'd say, contemptuous of PK's claims, when I wrote to him, asking him to update the site after PK's meddling. He hadn't realised ignorant fools of her type were using his site to berate and insult others. Now, you can carry on like this until doomsday, quite frankly. All you are is a bore. If harm comes to my family because of you, you will take the consequences and yes, I have taken steps to ensure that. In the meantime, post as much drivel as you wish. You chop it around so selectively, you omit the malice of PK so deliberately, you make mistakes so ignorantly, that to be frank, you are welcome to witter on to the three or four people who bother with you. From now on, into the kill file with you, you mammoth bore. Finally, may I point out to you that this is a royalty group and that as my family and I are not royal, we have no place in lengthy and really rather dull discussions of this sort. PK has spent years threatening me with disclosure of my family's history but being under a legal warning from me, she has incited you and the vicious Su-T to do her dirty work for her. Both will take the consequences, along with you, if any manic lurker here acts upon the information you have given them. You have put some members of my family in particular, in real danger and believe me, you're going to know about that if anything happens. -- Sacha (remove the weeds for email) Either you are as big a liar as your Leader or you are a moronic fool. On the assumption that you could be either, given your posting history, I will point out to you and the group that when I wrote that, PK had spent days ferreting around the internet, trying to prove I was *not* the mother of the 10th Earl of Jersey, and that the person on ATR who had congratulated me on my son's engagement was mistaken that his mother is me, and that she had tried to show that I was not, in fact, married to my first husband, though why that mattered to her, heaven alone knows. She went into envy overdrive and sent post after post after post, asking others for information to prove that the poster to atr was mistaken and that I was not WHO I HAD NEVER SAID I WAS. Until that point of her anxious, jealous, manic digging, nobody on this group knew from my postings that my son is the 10th Earl of Jersey. She and the people who then emailed her the information are the ones responsible for that appearing here and forcing me into replying to avert embarrassment to the member of atr who was profuse in their apologies to me for letting PK loose and, in my own naivete in the hope that the admission from me would put the matter to rest, where it belongs. My children are not royalty and thus are not relevant to this group unless royal matters somehow involve them. I should have known better, I admit. PK has *never* recovered from that blow - she is seething with fury and jealousy because having spent years, dismissing my knowledge of some aspects of British life that she will never know anything about, the proof that she was dead wrong was staring her in the face. She hasn't been able to let the matter rest ever since, which is why you have been primed like a leaky pump and aimed in my direction. And - please - don't try to pretend otherwise to this group. Too many of us have seen PK's string-pulling for too many years to believe you are acting entirely under your own volition. If there is any action to be taken against you in the future, PK will most certainly be implicated in it. Once, *many* years ago, I made a slip and posted as Sacha Villiers when normally I posted as 'Morley' and of course, one of the sweet little things here was onto it like a knife and started this whole ball rolling, even that long ago. PK wasn't even around then but I do know about the emails that went around and I know about them from people who received them, so lying won't work. You, Danny are not very good at this sort of research and I suggest you give it up. You have posted one lot of just slightly off information after another and all you are doing is proving to this group what a spiteful fool you are and how incapable of following genealogical information, just like Phyllis, who didn't even know what 'associated' meant and who took Hull as gospel - something that even the owner of that site didn't claim for it! He was shocked and I'd say, contemptuous of PK's claims, when I wrote to him, asking him to update the site after PK's meddling. He hadn't realised ignorant fools of her type were using his site to berate and insult others. Now, you can carry on like this until doomsday, quite frankly. All you are is a bore. If harm comes to my family because of you, you will take the consequences and yes, I have taken steps to ensure that. In the meantime, post as much drivel as you wish. You chop it around so selectively, you omit the malice of PK so deliberately, you make mistakes so ignorantly, that to be frank, you are welcome to witter on to the three or four people who bother with you. From now on, into the kill file with you, you mammoth bore. Finally, may I point out to you that this is a royalty group and that as my family and I are not royal, we have no place in lengthy and really rather dull discussions of this sort. PK has spent years threatening me with disclosure of my family's history but being under a legal warning from me, she has incited you and the vicious Su-T to do her dirty work for her. Both will take the consequences, along with you, if any manic lurker here acts upon the information you have given them. You have put some members of my family in particular, in real danger and believe me, you're going to know about that if anything happens. -- Sacha (remove the weeds for email) Either you are as big a liar as your Leader or you are a moronic fool. On the assumption that you could be either, given your posting history, I will point out to you and the group that when I wrote that, PK had spent days ferreting around the internet, trying to prove I was *not* the mother of the 10th Earl of Jersey, and that the person on ATR who had congratulated me on my son's engagement was mistaken that his mother is me, and that she had tried to show that I was not, in fact, married to my first husband, though why that mattered to her, heaven alone knows. She went into envy overdrive and sent post after post after post, asking others for information to prove that the poster to atr was mistaken and that I was not WHO I HAD NEVER SAID I WAS. Until that point of her anxious, jealous, manic digging, nobody on this group knew from my postings that my son is the 10th Earl of Jersey. She and the people who then emailed her the information are the ones responsible for that appearing here and forcing me into replying to avert embarrassment to the member of atr who was profuse in their apologies to me for letting PK loose and, in my own naivete in the hope that the admission from me would put the matter to rest, where it belongs. My children are not royalty and thus are not relevant to this group unless royal matters somehow involve them. I should have known better, I admit. PK has *never* recovered from that blow - she is seething with fury and jealousy because having spent years, dismissing my knowledge of some aspects of British life that she will never know anything about, the proof that she was dead wrong was staring her in the face. She hasn't been able to let the matter rest ever since, which is why you have been primed like a leaky pump and aimed in my direction. And - please - don't try to pretend otherwise to this group. Too many of us have seen PK's string-pulling for too many years to believe you are acting entirely under your own volition. If there is any action to be taken against you in the future, PK will most certainly be implicated in it. Once, *many* years ago, I made a slip and posted as Sacha Villiers when normally I posted as 'Morley' and of course, one of the sweet little things here was onto it like a knife and started this whole ball rolling, even that long ago. PK wasn't even around then but I do know about the emails that went around and I know about them from people who received them, so lying won't work. You, Danny are not very good at this sort of research and I suggest you give it up. You have posted one lot of just slightly off information after another and all you are doing is proving to this group what a spiteful fool you are and how incapable of following genealogical information, just like Phyllis, who didn't even know what 'associated' meant and who took Hull as gospel - something that even the owner of that site didn't claim for it! He was shocked and I'd say, contemptuous of PK's claims, when I wrote to him, asking him to update the site after PK's meddling. He hadn't realised ignorant fools of her type were using his site to berate and insult others. Now, you can carry on like this until doomsday, quite frankly. All you are is a bore. If harm comes to my family because of you, you will take the consequences and yes, I have taken steps to ensure that. In the meantime, post as much drivel as you wish. You chop it around so selectively, you omit the malice of PK so deliberately, you make mistakes so ignorantly, that to be frank, you are welcome to witter on to the three or four people who bother with you. From now on, into the kill file with you, you mammoth bore. Finally, may I point out to you that this is a royalty group and that as my family and I are not royal, we have no place in lengthy and really rather dull discussions of this sort. PK has spent years threatening me with disclosure of my family's history but being under a legal warning from me, she has incited you and the vicious Su-T to do her dirty work for her. Both will take the consequences, along with you, if any manic lurker here acts upon the information you have given them. You have put some members of my family in particular, in real danger and believe me, you're going to know about that if anything happens. -- Sacha (remove the weeds for email) http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...browse_thread/... 599e89adc930dc/7eb0dd3bcc3e2190?q=sacha&rnum=18&hl=en#7eb0dd3bcc3 e2190 this from someone who "claims" she does not post her family information LOL. she used her x husbands name while married to her new one, very WEIRD. Either you are as big a liar as your Leader or you are a moronic fool. On the assumption that you could be either, given your posting history, I will point out to you and the group that when I wrote that, PK had spent days ferreting around the internet, trying to prove I was *not* the mother of the 10th Earl of Jersey, and that the person on ATR who had congratulated me on my son's engagement was mistaken that his mother is me, and that she had tried to show that I was not, in fact, married to my first husband, though why that mattered to her, heaven alone knows. She went into envy overdrive and sent post after post after post, asking others for information to prove that the poster to atr was mistaken and that I was not WHO I HAD NEVER SAID I WAS. Until that point of her anxious, jealous, manic digging, nobody on this group knew from my postings that my son is the 10th Earl of Jersey. She and the people who then emailed her the information are the ones responsible for that appearing here and forcing me into replying to avert embarrassment to the member of atr who was profuse in their apologies to me for letting PK loose and, in my own naivete in the hope that the admission from me would put the matter to rest, where it belongs. My children are not royalty and thus are not relevant to this group unless royal matters somehow involve them. I should have known better, I admit. PK has *never* recovered from that blow - she is seething with fury and jealousy because having spent years, dismissing my knowledge of some aspects of British life that she will never know anything about, the proof that she was dead wrong was staring her in the face. She hasn't been able to let the matter rest ever since, which is why you have been primed like a leaky pump and aimed in my direction. And - please - don't try to pretend otherwise to this group. Too many of us have seen PK's string-pulling for too many years to believe you are acting entirely under your own volition. If there is any action to be taken against you in the future, PK will most certainly be implicated in it. Once, *many* years ago, I made a slip and posted as Sacha Villiers when normally I posted as 'Morley' and of course, one of the sweet little things here was onto it like a knife and started this whole ball rolling, even that I've stopped here because frankly the woman does go on and on and on ..... [Reply: Your usual BS & threats. Your justifications for acting ugly, & blaming it on others. Last night on CBS, there was a program about an imposter, a sociopath, & his justifications for crimes, meanness, lying, cons. He'd impersonated a famous reporter.] And as my ex husband interested you so much, you have the date of his death wrong. [Reply: Tell the website owner, not me.] I would like to point out to you that I have *never, ever* posted the names of your family here or PK's family But now, you've moved the goalposts, so I see no reason to refrain from doing so in future. [Reply: Your KKKlan (Hal Sanders & Q) have posted my personal information, after repeatedly threatening to do so. It's a common bad game you play. You've also repeatedly lied about me & what I posted, & slandered me. I can't control what you do or don't do; only the police can. I hope this latest threat by you, is forwarded by PK, to those police officers who are investigating you. You've just threatened my family too, in which there are children, minors.] Really? Then no doubt your family will have something to say to you about your behaviour to the families of others. How *very* typical of you to now start hiding behind someone else's supposed children. What a filthy wretch you are. Let others make up opinions about people Sacha, why are you ALWAYS in the middle. You use really nasty language, what happened to you in your childhood to warrant such a sick mind. |
Sacha Hubbard
wrote in message oups.com... Here a selection of your favourite rants Sacha Queen of Usenet. Your majesty, I though to give you some of the treatment you give others. But these below are all true, written by you to others and one wonders indeed where you get the time and how do you manage to carry so much evil in you. boring pointless, tedious crap snipped the middle. You use really nasty language, what happened to you in your childhood to warrant such a sick mind. you pointless peasant plonk |
Sacha Hubbard
"Ageless" wrote in message . .. wrote in message oups.com... Here a selection of your favourite rants Sacha Queen of Usenet. Your majesty, I though to give you some of the treatment you give others. But these below are all true, written by you to others and one wonders indeed where you get the time and how do you manage to carry so much evil in you. boring pointless, tedious crap snipped the middle. You use really nasty language, what happened to you in your childhood to warrant such a sick mind. you pointless peasant plonk do feed the troll the pukes been trolling hre for years under different names ..... |
Sacha Hubbard
Have you realy nothing better to do with your time? Its been another
lovely day here! -- Charlie Pridham, Gardening in Cornwall www.roselandhouse.co.uk Holders of national collections of Clematis viticella cultivars and Lapageria rosea |
Sacha Hubbard
wrote in message oups.com... And your point was? |
Sacha Hubbard
"Alan Holmes" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... And your point was? There is only one way to deal with people like this -Hunt them down and get the baseball bat to the kneecaps!:-} On a serious note i would!! |
Sacha Hubbard
Charlie Pridham wrote:
Its been another lovely day here! And here in the northeastern U.S. as well.... temp approaching 50F, which is about right (finally!) for the season. I've been happily trimming and weighing the garlic crop, which hung in the shed to cure for a while. Greens are still doing nicely in the garden, and Dear Lady is complaining about the quantity of lettuce I keep bringing in. Time to try out some Kale, which is in its glory now that things are cooler! As for the loonies, I've gotten less tolerant in my old age: They get killfiled as to those misguided souls who have to quote the whole rant before making a brief reply. Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G |
Sacha Hubbard
killfiled as to those misguided souls ^^ do Fat finger syndrome. Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G |
Sacha Hubbard
"Gary Woods" wrote in message ... Charlie Pridham wrote: Its been another lovely day here! And here in the northeastern U.S. as well.... temp approaching 50F, which is about right (finally!) for the season. I've been happily trimming and weighing the garlic crop, which hung in the shed to cure for a while. Greens are still doing nicely in the garden, and Dear Lady is complaining about the quantity of lettuce I keep bringing in. Time to try out some Kale, which is in its glory now that things are cooler! Red Russian Kale has been particularly tasty over here this year, IMO. |
Sacha Hubbard
In article , "keith kent" writes: | | There is only one way to deal with people like this -Hunt them down and get | the baseball bat to the kneecaps!:-} | On a serious note i would!! Now, now - this is uk.rec.gardening - we don't do such things. What I say is "compost them!" For some reason, I keep thinking of Helen of Troll - was this the pest that launched a thousand posts? Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
Sacha Hubbard
On 25/10/07 19:37, in article , "Nick
Maclaren" wrote: In article , "keith kent" writes: | | There is only one way to deal with people like this -Hunt them down and get | the baseball bat to the kneecaps!:-} | On a serious note i would!! Now, now - this is uk.rec.gardening - we don't do such things. What I say is "compost them!" For some reason, I keep thinking of Helen of Troll - was this the pest that launched a thousand posts? Lor' I hope not! One is more than enough from that quarter! -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
Sacha Hubbard
On Oct 25, 7:51 pm, Sacha wrote:
Thank you, Helene. I'm glad you did that because now those who read your posts will see how you operate. Frankly I don't give a turnip about what you think anymore. I've had enough to show that I can't control myself with idiots like you. You are not liked by many, and those that do are doing it because they know your husband or some are simply tolerant of you - I think its a generation thing. My phone call message to you was kind and calm, but I can't prove it. That alone is immensely frustrating. I'm no longer interested in staying in a forum that is controled by a cheap woman like you. You will twist and change everything, even my trip to Devon and your nursery. You make it sounds as if I was some sort of pervert. It is reallly bothering me you see, seeing you parading all over the place with your lies. Friends tell me to ignore you but I have gained so much in this forum for my dissertation and courses that I do. Though not much has come from you I must say. I wish you were not there or on a long holiday when this forum is nice, and for you never to return. Sorry Charlie, Jennifer .... I can't be ignored anymore, it's silly, I like conversation and I like people, but Sacha won't give it a rest and will constantly attack me like on the other thread. Being told I'm morphing, or trolling or whatever isn't nice after so long writing here, because it makes me look as if I'm not worth being listened too and therefore I've no place here anymore. You both know who I am but never say anything. Some idiot claiming to know nothing about gardening has recently proposed to someone to wait for her plant that has never flowered for the seeds to drop and grow next year. It's sometimes so frustrating to see none of you saying anything, just letting it pass because that idiot happened to be a mate of Sacha. And that has happened in other forums where Sacha posts. I'll pop over in the spring, but from now till then I've better things to do. You know where to find me though. Cheers. |
Sacha Hubbard
wrote .. Here a selection of your favourite rants Sacha Thank you for that post Helen, most enlightening. Probably not in the way you intended though. :-) - - Regards Bob Hobden 17mls W. of London.UK |
Sacha Hubbard
All I can say is that the original morphing of 'La puce' to 'Puke' has
never been better demonstrated than in this last outpouring of vitriol and bile. The woman's obviously completely deranged. In the 10 years that I've been on URG no-one has been so completely focused and persistent in their abuse of others and determination to disrupt. Dare I say it, but even Mike Crowe seems positively avuncular and jovial by comparison. At least all he does is stir things up a bit and go on about 'NG owners', which is relatively harmless with no real damage done. Puke's infestation of this NG is becoming somewhat sinister. |
Sacha Hubbard
|
Sacha Hubbard
In article om, Dave
Poole writes All I can say is that the original morphing of 'La puce' to 'Puke' has never been better demonstrated than in this last outpouring of vitriol and bile. The woman's obviously completely deranged. In the 10 years that I've been on URG no-one has been so completely focused and persistent in their abuse of others and determination to disrupt. Dare I say it, but even Mike Crowe seems positively avuncular and jovial by comparison. At least all he does is stir things up a bit and go on about 'NG owners', which is relatively harmless with no real damage done. Puke's infestation of this NG is becoming somewhat sinister. It's only a matter of time before the media delves into newsgroups and forums to bring to the attention of Joe Public the more outrageous threads and ramblings:) Now there's an awful thought ............... -- Janet Tweedy Dalmatian Telegraph http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk |
Sacha Hubbard
On 26/10/07 12:43, in article , "Janet
Tweedy" wrote: In article om, Dave Poole writes All I can say is that the original morphing of 'La puce' to 'Puke' has never been better demonstrated than in this last outpouring of vitriol and bile. The woman's obviously completely deranged. In the 10 years that I've been on URG no-one has been so completely focused and persistent in their abuse of others and determination to disrupt. Dare I say it, but even Mike Crowe seems positively avuncular and jovial by comparison. At least all he does is stir things up a bit and go on about 'NG owners', which is relatively harmless with no real damage done. Puke's infestation of this NG is becoming somewhat sinister. It's only a matter of time before the media delves into newsgroups and forums to bring to the attention of Joe Public the more outrageous threads and ramblings:) Now there's an awful thought ............... The press does look at newsgroups, believe me. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
Sacha Hubbard
On Oct 25, 5:25 pm, wrote:
Snip. Yet more vindictive and tiresome crap from a chronic attention seeker giving rise to no less than 20 posts so far (21 with mine). The killfile is our collective friend, folks. Cat(h) |
Sacha Hubbard
On Oct 25, 7:02 pm, Jennifer Sparkes wrote:
The message from Charlie Pridham contains these words: Have you realy nothing better to do with your time? Its been another lovely day here! Agree Charlie - but alas not weatherwise here in Bristol. :( Grow up Helene ... Jennifer Hi Jennifer, the weather here in France is not good today either and I wanted to get out into the garden I haven't been commenting on Helene's behaviour and in fact I have posted very little and content myself reading and trying to learn something. Hopefully things will now settle down on here and I can start contributing a little more than I usually do. My only comment on the matter is that I think Sacha has had a lot of bashing and, in my opinion, it was totally unfair and unjustified. Judith |
Sacha Hubbard
"Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 26/10/07 12:43, in article , "Janet Tweedy" wrote: In article om, Dave Poole writes All I can say is that the original morphing of 'La puce' to 'Puke' has never been better demonstrated than in this last outpouring of vitriol and bile. The woman's obviously completely deranged. In the 10 years that I've been on URG no-one has been so completely focused and persistent in their abuse of others and determination to disrupt. Dare I say it, but even Mike Crowe seems positively avuncular and jovial by comparison. At least all he does is stir things up a bit and go on about 'NG owners', which is relatively harmless with no real damage done. Puke's infestation of this NG is becoming somewhat sinister. It's only a matter of time before the media delves into newsgroups and forums to bring to the attention of Joe Public the more outrageous threads and ramblings:) Now there's an awful thought ............... The press does look at newsgroups, believe me. I must read the Maily Dale a little more closely! |
Sacha Hubbard
"Gary Woods" wrote in message ... killfiled as to those misguided souls ^^ do Fat finger syndrome. It must be catching!(:-) |
Sacha Hubbard
"Sacha" wrote The press does look at newsgroups, believe me. Am I the only none that notices things mentioned here that appear in Gardeners World a couple of weeks later. Could be a co-incidence but it happens too often IMO. Not that I watch it much these days, bring back Percy. -- Regards Bob Hobden 17mls W. of London.UK |
Sacha Hubbard
"Cat(h)" wrote Snip. Yet more vindictive and tiresome crap from a chronic attention seeker giving rise to no less than 20 posts so far (21 with mine). The killfile is our collective friend, folks. I used to think that and still use it on occasion for the moronic trolls but some people need watching. -- Regards Bob Hobden 17mls W. of London.UK |
Sacha Hubbard
On Oct 26, 5:57 pm, Martin wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:57:17 +0100, "Bob Hobden" wrote: "Cat(h)" wrote Snip. Yet more vindictive and tiresome crap from a chronic attention seeker giving rise to no less than 20 posts so far (21 with mine). The killfile is our collective friend, folks. I used to think that and still use it on occasion for the moronic trolls but some people need watching. There'd be less friction here if the emphasis was on ignoring. -- Martin Grin I read that as ironing and thought "what does he mean?" :-)) Judith |
Sacha Hubbard
On Oct 26, 6:35 pm, Martin wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:30:30 -0000, "judith.lea" wrote: On Oct 26, 5:57 pm, Martin wrote: On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:57:17 +0100, "Bob Hobden" wrote: "Cat(h)" wrote Snip. Yet more vindictive and tiresome crap from a chronic attention seeker giving rise to no less than 20 posts so far (21 with mine). The killfile is our collective friend, folks. I used to think that and still use it on occasion for the moronic trolls but some people need watching. There'd be less friction here if the emphasis was on ignoring. -- Martin Grin I read that as ironing and thought "what does he mean?" :-)) It's all that doing the dirty washing in public. :-) -- Martin- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Aah, yes, I understand :-) email me can you as I have lost your email addy. Judith |
Sacha Hubbard
On 26/10/07 17:57, in article , "Bob
Hobden" wrote: "Cat(h)" wrote Snip. Yet more vindictive and tiresome crap from a chronic attention seeker giving rise to no less than 20 posts so far (21 with mine). The killfile is our collective friend, folks. I used to think that and still use it on occasion for the moronic trolls but some people need watching. Yes. The kill file allows the worst offenders to persist unseen and unchecked. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
Sacha Hubbard
In article , Bob Hobden
writes "Sacha" wrote The press does look at newsgroups, believe me. Am I the only none that notices things mentioned here that appear in Gardeners World a couple of weeks later. Could be a co-incidence but it happens too often IMO. Not that I watch it much these days, bring back Percy. I remember mentioning an unusual horse chestnut once and it appeared in the Telegraph about three weeks later then in GW about 6 months ago! Me first, me first ...................... -- Janet Tweedy Dalmatian Telegraph http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk |
Sacha Hubbard
"Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 26/10/07 17:57, in article , "Bob Hobden" wrote: "Cat(h)" wrote Snip. Yet more vindictive and tiresome crap from a chronic attention seeker giving rise to no less than 20 posts so far (21 with mine). The killfile is our collective friend, folks. I used to think that and still use it on occasion for the moronic trolls but some people need watching. Yes. The kill file allows the worst offenders to persist unseen and unchecked. OTOH, non-use of the filter facility and continually 'rising to the bait' only seems to prolong and instensify exchanges of verbal vitriol. |
Sacha Hubbard
"BAC" wrote:
OTOH, non-use of the filter facility and continually 'rising to the bait' only seems to prolong and instensify exchanges of verbal vitriol. I agree: Trolls need to be fed, and if ignored eventually wither and die. I always think of the "monster" in "Forbidden Planet." It's raining pretty seriously in the Northeastern U.S., with our first freeze predicted tomorrow night. I haven't even had a frost yet on my hilltop. Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G |
Sacha Hubbard
"Janet Tweedy" wrote in message ... In article , Bob Hobden writes "Sacha" wrote The press does look at newsgroups, believe me. Am I the only none that notices things mentioned here that appear in Gardeners World a couple of weeks later. Could be a co-incidence but it happens too often IMO. Not that I watch it much these days, bring back Percy. I remember mentioning an unusual horse chestnut once and it appeared in the Telegraph about three weeks later then in GW about 6 months ago! Me first, me first ...................... You are surely not admitting to be a reader of the Telegraph? Shame on you! |
Sacha Hubbard
On Oct 27, 2:43 pm, Gary Woods wrote:
It's raining pretty seriously in the Northeastern U.S., with our first freeze predicted tomorrow night. I haven't even had a frost yet on my hilltop. I brought in all the tender plants and geraniums and put them in the barn, it's a lovely day and hot enough to eat outside. The nights are another matter, frost last night and snow flurries are predicted on Sancy. not enough to lay, just a light dusting. Are you in New York State Gary? Judith |
Sacha Hubbard
"judith.lea" wrote:
Are you in New York State Gary? Yes; in the hills about 30 miles west of Albany; perhaps 180 miles west of Boston (the American one). 1400 feet elevation, so a bit cooler than the maps would indicate. That's a two-edged sword: my summers are a bit cooler, but I usually get the first frost somewhat later than the valleys below. Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G |
Sacha Hubbard
In article ,
says... "judith.lea" wrote: Are you in New York State Gary? Yes; in the hills about 30 miles west of Albany; perhaps 180 miles west of Boston (the American one). 1400 feet elevation, so a bit cooler than the maps would indicate. That's a two-edged sword: my summers are a bit cooler, but I usually get the first frost somewhat later than the valleys below. Is that the Albany-new york of Clematis 'Betty Corning' fame? (Wife of a mayor there 1920's-1930's) -- Charlie Pridham, Gardening in Cornwall www.roselandhouse.co.uk Holders of national collections of Clematis viticella cultivars and Lapageria rosea |
Sacha Hubbard
On Oct 27, 3:24 pm, Gary Woods wrote:
"judith.lea" wrote: Are you in New York State Gary? Yes; in the hills about 30 miles west of Albany; perhaps 180 miles west of Boston (the American one). 1400 feet elevation, so a bit cooler than the maps would indicate. That's a two-edged sword: my summers are a bit cooler, but I usually get the first frost somewhat later than the valleys below. Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G I know where you are, lovely countryside. Judith |
Sacha Hubbard
Charlie Pridham wrote:
Is that the Albany-new york of Clematis 'Betty Corning' fame? Indeed yes; Erastus Corning was mayor through, I think, the late 70s. He was a branch of the family that owned Corning Glass...old money (at least for us; you folks have much older). The George Landis arboretum across the valley from me has that Clematis. I keep meaning to snitch a cutting or two, after making a suitable donation. Does that violate the "cuttings will succeed only if stolen" rule? Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G |
Sacha Hubbard
On 27/10/07 00:45, in article , "Janet
Tweedy" wrote: In article , Bob Hobden writes "Sacha" wrote The press does look at newsgroups, believe me. Am I the only none that notices things mentioned here that appear in Gardeners World a couple of weeks later. Could be a co-incidence but it happens too often IMO. Not that I watch it much these days, bring back Percy. I remember mentioning an unusual horse chestnut once and it appeared in the Telegraph about three weeks later then in GW about 6 months ago! Me first, me first ...................... Yes! Something I said on another group was quoted in the DT a few years ago, giving my name. I don't know who wa more surprised - the people who had been making libellous remarks or me, who had been refuting them! -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
Sacha Hubbard
On 27/10/07 09:34, in article ,
"Martin" wrote: On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:01:10 +0100, Sacha wrote: On 26/10/07 17:57, in article , "Bob Hobden" wrote: "Cat(h)" wrote Snip. Yet more vindictive and tiresome crap from a chronic attention seeker giving rise to no less than 20 posts so far (21 with mine). The killfile is our collective friend, folks. I used to think that and still use it on occasion for the moronic trolls but some people need watching. Yes. The kill file allows the worst offenders to persist unseen and unchecked. If they are unseen, who cares? :-) Newbies who don't know the difference. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
Sacha Hubbard
In article ,
says... Charlie Pridham wrote: Is that the Albany-new york of Clematis 'Betty Corning' fame? Indeed yes; Erastus Corning was mayor through, I think, the late 70s. He was a branch of the family that owned Corning Glass...old money (at least for us; you folks have much older). The George Landis arboretum across the valley from me has that Clematis. I keep meaning to snitch a cutting or two, after making a suitable donation. Does that violate the "cuttings will succeed only if stolen" rule? Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G Thats more or less how Betty got it! apparently found on a house front in the mid west and taken all the way to Texas as a cutting in a potato. Still has the best scent of any summer flowering clematis. -- Charlie Pridham, Gardening in Cornwall www.roselandhouse.co.uk Holders of national collections of Clematis viticella cultivars and Lapageria rosea |
Sacha Hubbard
On 27/10/07 09:32, in article ,
"Martin" wrote: On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:45:25 +0100, Janet Tweedy wrote: In article , Bob Hobden writes "Sacha" wrote The press does look at newsgroups, believe me. Am I the only none that notices things mentioned here that appear in Gardeners World a couple of weeks later. Could be a co-incidence but it happens too often IMO. Not that I watch it much these days, bring back Percy. I remember mentioning an unusual horse chestnut once and it appeared in the Telegraph about three weeks later then in GW about 6 months ago! Me first, me first ...................... Is this the time to post photos of unusual shaped carrots? Tsk, Martin! This is a non-binary group. ;-))) -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:37 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter