Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Maths to answer Hussein - OT (was Snails)
In article ,
Kay Easton wrote: Origin is from Roman habit of killing one man in 10 in some circumstance - can't remember what, Mary will know. So it means 'reduce by a 10th' though seems to be changing its meaning by common usage as 'more or less wipe out' It was a punishment for fleeing from the enemy, though I can't tell you the exact circumstances. Or even 9st 4 lb, where the stones are decimal but the pounds are to base 14 ;-) Oh, yeah? Stones as in fraction of a hundredweight? Or a ton? Yours pedantically, Nick Maclaren. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Maths to answer Hussein - OT (was Snails)
Kay Easton wrote:
Or even 9st 4 lb, where the stones are decimal but the pounds are to base 14 ;-) We colonists have 16-ounce pounds. Everything bigger and better, you know! Though I'm almost sure to be out-pedanted (I can hardly to see what the spelchekur thinks of that one). Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at www.albany.net/~gwoods Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1200' elevation. NY WO G |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Maths to answer Hussein - OT (was Snails)
In article ,
Kay Easton wrote: Or even 9st 4 lb, where the stones are decimal but the pounds are to base 14 ;-) Oh, yeah? Stones as in fraction of a hundredweight? Or a ton? Well, I was thinking of stones as in terms of weight, and whereas I'm quite happy to believe *your* weight should be measured in hundredweights, mine most certainly is not! ;-) Oh, you mean PERSONAL weights (nudge, nudge, wink, wink)? I can certainly remember that the conventional set of units for weights was tons, hundredweight, stones, pounds and ounces, and that you would have been marked down for failing to use any of them. Don't ask me why personal weights were an exception. I am happy to believe that you weigh less than 8 stone, but I am not concerned that I don't! At 18, I was 9 stone (i.e. 1 hundredweight, 1 stone) - and at 6'2", that is seriously underweight. I am now 3-4 stone heavier :-) Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Maths to answer Hussein - OT (was Snails)
The message
from Gary Woods contains these words: Kay Easton wrote: Or even 9st 4 lb, where the stones are decimal but the pounds are to base 14 ;-) We colonists have 16-ounce pounds. Everything bigger and better, you know! Except your poor little colonial pints and gallons. We too have 16-ounce pounds. Kay's talking about 14 pounds make one stone. :-) Janet. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Maths to answer Hussein - OT (was Snails)
In article , Gary Woods
writes Kay Easton wrote: Or even 9st 4 lb, where the stones are decimal but the pounds are to base 14 ;-) We colonists have 16-ounce pounds. Everything bigger and better, you know! Though I'm almost sure to be out-pedanted (I can hardly to see what the spelchekur thinks of that one). We have 16 ounce pounds, but 14 pound stones. I think I phrased my previous post a little misleadingly! IIRC you have small gallons but huge cups? -- Kay Easton Edward's earthworm page: http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/edward/index.htm |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Maths to answer Hussein - OT (was Snails)
Kay Easton wrote:
IIRC you have small gallons but huge cups? Which I'm too infrequently in {:-) You folks just went metric to catch up! (Sorry; I'm manic today.) Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at www.albany.net/~gwoods Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1200' elevation. NY WO G |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bush much worse than Hussein | United Kingdom | |||
Saddam Hussein in Custard | Roses | |||
Telegraph : Odd ball letter starts maths puzzle mania | United Kingdom |