GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   United Kingdom (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/)
-   -   Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/195324-hi-im-new-fairly-new-gardening-s.html)

'Mike'[_4_] 25-01-2011 05:10 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 


"Baz" wrote in message
...
"'Mike'" wrote in
:




Bad Boys Ravish Only Young Girls But Violet Gives Willingly

Will that do?


:-))

You are SOOOOOOOOOO polite ;-)

Close :-)

Mike




Why am I soooooo polite

You asked and I have given.

Baz


52 years ago yesterday, I started my Radio/Radar Training when I went into
the Royal Navy and the mnemonic we learnt, was not quite so polite as yours
;-) and I have heard it time and time again from Radio/Radar Mechs and
Telephone Engineers.

email me if you want the version I know ;-)

Mike


--

....................................
Don't take life too seriously, you'll never get out alive
....................................




Bill Grey 25-01-2011 05:38 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 


Nor when I left a (dire) public school in 1965. However, I do have
a degree in mathematics ....

On the matter of multiplication tables, I didn't learn mine until
I was well into my teens, and 7x8 was always my bugbear - however,
I could work out the answer fast enough that the teachers never
realised, so I never got punished for it (sic). 7x8 = 2 x 7x4
or 7x8 = 7x7 + 7.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.


Many people can tell you straight away that 7x8=56 but have to think about
8x7?

It's always this calculation tha springs to mind.

Bill



Bill Grey 25-01-2011 05:38 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

wrote in message
...
wrote:
On the matter of multiplication tables, I didn't learn mine until
I was well into my teens, and 7x8 was always my bugbear - however,
I could work out the answer fast enough that the teachers never
realised, so I never got punished for it (sic). 7x8 = 2 x 7x4
or 7x8 = 7x7 + 7.


I think I do the last one, (7x7)+7



Oh dear! :-)

Bill




Bill Grey 25-01-2011 05:43 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

"kay" wrote in message
...

'Sacha[_4_ Wrote:


When I was about 4 or 5 I went to a small school where we used to chant

our tables first lesson every morning. I know it's considered the
'wrong way' now (or is it?) but that method certainly made the tables
stick in the mind. To this day, I recall my tables easily.


Arguably, knowing ones tables is a lot less important than being able to
understand percentages, differentials and probabilities. Often I see
articles in the press in which percentages have been translated into
fractions which are plain incorrect, hear people mix up "RPI is lower"
with "prices are reducing", or see people worry unduly about a "50%
increased risk" when the risk itself is so small that the change in
behaviour to avoid the risk itself has more ill effects!

I'd happily settle for less ability to multiply numbers together in ones
head in exchange for greater understanding of what the numbers actually
say, and therefore a greater ability to separate scientific argument
from opinion and quackery.




--
kay


But one has to start somewhere!

Bll



Bill Grey 25-01-2011 05:48 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

"'Mike'" wrote in message
...

I wonder if there are any Electronic Engineers reading this who remember
the mnemonic for remembering the Resistor Colour Code ;-}}


Mike


Or indeed the colours of the rainbow :-)

Bill



Baz[_3_] 25-01-2011 06:25 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
"Bill Grey" wrote in
:


"'Mike'" wrote in message
...

I wonder if there are any Electronic Engineers reading this who
remember the mnemonic for remembering the Resistor Colour Code ;-}}


Mike


Or indeed the colours of the rainbow :-)

Bill




Does putting the word "indeed" in every answer mean something?
Do you actually know what it means?

Baz

Bill Grey 25-01-2011 07:48 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

"Baz" wrote in message
...
"Bill Grey" wrote in
:


"'Mike'" wrote in message
...

I wonder if there are any Electronic Engineers reading this who
remember the mnemonic for remembering the Resistor Colour Code ;-}}


Mike


Or indeed the colours of the rainbow :-)

Bill




Does putting the word "indeed" in every answer mean something?
Do you actually know what it means?

Baz


A bit picky aren't you ?

Bill



Bill Grey 25-01-2011 07:58 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

"Baz" wrote in message
...
"Bill Grey" wrote in
:


"'Mike'" wrote in message
...

I wonder if there are any Electronic Engineers reading this who
remember the mnemonic for remembering the Resistor Colour Code ;-}}


Mike


Or indeed the colours of the rainbow :-)

Bill




Does putting the word "indeed" in every answer mean something?
Do you actually know what it means?

Baz


Just to things into perspective, I've replied 14 times in this thread and
used the word indeed in only two of those replies, so what's your point ?

Please crawl back under your stone.

Bill



No Name 25-01-2011 11:54 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
'Mike' wrote:
I love it when the press or the like come out with ""And 35% are against
.................""

and what does that leave? 65% in favour, but that is bad for the press!!!!


I like* things like '75% fat free' ... meaning 25% fat? Eyww.

No Name 25-01-2011 11:56 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
Baz wrote:
I remember 'completing the square on a generic quadratic from first
principles' suddenly clicking whilst I was in the dentist chair having
a tooth removed ...

No doubt it is completed now?
I wonder if you would like to share your findings with us.


I'd rather not have another tooth pulled out so I can re-remember it!


'Mike'[_4_] 26-01-2011 08:20 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

wrote in message
...
Baz wrote:
I remember 'completing the square on a generic quadratic from first
principles' suddenly clicking whilst I was in the dentist chair having
a tooth removed ...

No doubt it is completed now?
I wonder if you would like to share your findings with us.


I'd rather not have another tooth pulled out so I can re-remember it!


:-))

I don't remember having a tooth pulled :-) I had the lot out in one go under
full aesthetic in hospital years and years and years ago :-))

Mike ;-0



--

....................................
Don't take life too seriously, you'll never get out alive
....................................





No Name 26-01-2011 11:33 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
Martin wrote:
No doubt it is completed now?
I wonder if you would like to share your findings with us.

I'd rather not have another tooth pulled out so I can re-remember it!

How do you do long multiplication and division, with or without having a wisdom
tooth pulled? I am just trying to understand. :-)


With a pencil and paper, mostly.


No Name 26-01-2011 03:46 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
Martin wrote:
How do you do long multiplication and division, with or without having a wisdom
tooth pulled? I am just trying to understand. :-)

With a pencil and paper, mostly.

Without using 1-9 times tables?


I said I didn't have instant recall on them, not that I couldn't do them and
didn't use them. This 'discussion' is becoming silly.

kay 26-01-2011 04:40 PM

But I think learning times tables by rote up to 12 x 12 is the wrong place to start!

mayasohni 26-01-2011 05:16 PM

Teachingquran.com is an institute which is providing online Quran recitation all over the world through internet. Teachingquran.com has been serving Humanity and serving ALLAH (God) since 20 years. Our aim is to spread Quran’s Education all over the world with proper way of teaching.

Pete[_9_] 26-01-2011 05:31 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 


"'Mike'" wrote in message ...




Now Dear, just sit down for a while, glass of wine? :-)


.................................................. ............................................

No, Horlicks later.


Confusion comes with the Bus Pass ;-))


Mike


Not round here - they don't (:-(

Pete





Bill Grey 26-01-2011 09:51 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

"kay" wrote in message
...[i]

Bill Grey;911046 Wrote:
"kay" wrote in message
...


I'd happily settle for less ability to multiply numbers together in
ones
head in exchange for greater understanding of what the numbers
actually
say, and therefore a greater ability to separate scientific argument
from opinion and quackery.


But one has to start somewhere!


But I think learning times tables by rote up to 12 x 12 is the wrong
place to start!




--
kay


You are entitled to your opinion, I happen to disagree.

Best wishes

Bill



'Mike'[_4_] 26-01-2011 09:56 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

"Bill Grey" wrote in message
...[i]

"kay" wrote in message
...

Bill Grey;911046 Wrote:
"kay" wrote in message
...


I'd happily settle for less ability to multiply numbers together in
ones
head in exchange for greater understanding of what the numbers
actually
say, and therefore a greater ability to separate scientific argument
from opinion and quackery.


But one has to start somewhere!


But I think learning times tables by rote up to 12 x 12 is the wrong
place to start!




--
kay


You are entitled to your opinion, I happen to disagree.

Best wishes

Bill


Agree with you Bill.

Funny that my eldest daughter who learnt the tables by rote passed the 11+
and went on to Uni, but the others had their education buggered about with
and didn't.

If it aint broke ..................

Mike


--

....................................
Don't take life too seriously, you'll never get out alive
....................................





Tom 26-01-2011 11:59 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
wrote in
:

'Mike' wrote:
I love it when the press or the like come out with ""And 35% are
against .................""

and what does that leave? 65% in favour, but that is bad for the
press!!!!


I like* things like '75% fat free' ... meaning 25% fat? Eyww.


To digress, in California you can get egg-free omlettes and
fat-free sour cream. I have a container of the latter, but
couldn't figure out how to preserve and transport the former.

Tom 27-01-2011 12:07 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
kay wrote in
:

I'd happily settle for less ability to multiply numbers together in ones
head in exchange for greater understanding of what the numbers actually
say, and therefore a greater ability to separate scientific argument
from opinion and quackery.


Very true.

But it would help if more than 20% of primary school
teachers knew the answer to "what is one plus two time three".

In my highly scientific survey of teachers at schools that
my daughter might have gone to 15 years ago:
- about 50% were convinced the answer is 9
- about 30% asked where the brackets were,
and were stumped when I said "none, just
the normal laws of arithmetic"
- about 20% got the right answer

It would also be nice not to have secondary school
teachers tell me that I couldn't possibly have
elementary calculus for O-level (and a year early
at that, just like everyone else in my state school)

Tom 27-01-2011 12:13 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
"'Mike'" wrote in
:

I went to a Private School and they were very hot on the 3 x 'R's from
a very early age. Later, and as I had no desire to go into the Hotel
business like my parents, I went for an interview for an
Apprenticeship as a Marine Electrical Engineer During the interview I
was asked 'What are your Maths like?' 'Good I suppose', 'What are 7 x
8's?' and before he had finished I flashed '56'. I always remember
that because I surprised myself as to just how fast I was able to
recall it!!!!


That's arithmetic, not maths. (OK, a small subset of maths)

Tom 27-01-2011 12:13 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
kay wrote in
:
Arguably, knowing ones tables is a lot less important than being able to
understand percentages, differentials and probabilities. Often I see
articles in the press in which percentages have been translated into
fractions which are plain incorrect, hear people mix up "RPI is lower"
with "prices are reducing", or see people worry unduly about a "50%
increased risk" when the risk itself is so small that the change in
behaviour to avoid the risk itself has more ill effects!

I'd happily settle for less ability to multiply numbers together in ones
head in exchange for greater understanding of what the numbers actually
say, and therefore a greater ability to separate scientific argument
from opinion and quackery.


One of my pet peeves is the statements that you can reduce your
consumption of X by 900%, where X is fuel or jelly babies or
whatever

Tom 27-01-2011 12:20 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
Martin wrote in
:

In real life being able to instantly recall a product is better than
knowing how to derive it from scratch.



And much better than either is knowing how and
when to use/apply it, and to use the right tool
to get the correct answer.


[email protected] 27-01-2011 08:01 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
In article ,
Martin wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:57:05 +0000, Sacha wrote:
On 2011-01-26 16:40:08 +0000, kay said:

But I think learning times tables by rote up to 12 x 12 is the wrong
place to start!


Worked and continues to work, for me.


The difference between our generation and the young ones, is that we can do
mental arithmetic. Tables are part of the basic tools needed to do this.

Not necessarily. I didn't rely on them and still don't. When my
elder daughter had trouble with her tables, I taught her the methods
I used and said that I didn't give a damn how she got the answer,
provided that she got the right one in under a second. She did,
and got a first-class engineering degree.

There's more than one way to kill a cat.

Nick says people can use a calculator, but I have yet to see anybody doing this
in a supermarket, for example. Our two kids did arithmetic using a calculator
at school. I don't think they even own one nowadays.


If you can't learn tables and can't learn the mathematical tricks,
then any sane person would buy one.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

Bill Grey 27-01-2011 09:22 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

Nick says people can use a calculator, but I have yet to see anybody
doing this
in a supermarket, for example. Our two kids did arithmetic using a
calculator
at school. I don't think they even own one nowadays.


If you can't learn tables and can't learn the mathematical tricks,
then any sane person would buy one.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.


It's no great encumberance to learn the times table at an early age - it can
only help in future years.
There maybe more than one way to skin a cat, but it doesn't hurt to have
more than one string to your bow.

Children at the age that times tables were taught could readily absorb the
information, why deny them such a wonderful experience of learning a
technique that could serve them well in their future
lives.

When you know what things mean mathematically, calculators are fine ( they
save time, and time is money), but, same as GPS they're ok while the
batteries still work.

Bill



Bill Grey 27-01-2011 09:27 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

"Tom" wrote in message
.253...
Martin wrote in
:

In real life being able to instantly recall a product is better than
knowing how to derive it from scratch.



And much better than either is knowing how and
when to use/apply it, and to use the right tool
to get the correct answer.


Try solving a quadratic equation using the "formla" method, oh damn! -
you've forgotten the formula (shame)

Now use the "completing the square" logical method.- no formulae involved.

Nice to kow how it really is done.

Bill



'Mike'[_4_] 27-01-2011 10:10 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 


"Martin" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:01:19 +0000 (GMT), wrote:

In article ,
Martin wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:57:05 +0000, Sacha wrote:
On 2011-01-26 16:40:08 +0000, kay said:

But I think learning times tables by rote up to 12 x 12 is the wrong
place to start!

Worked and continues to work, for me.

The difference between our generation and the young ones, is that we can
do
mental arithmetic. Tables are part of the basic tools needed to do this.

Not necessarily. I didn't rely on them and still don't. When my
elder daughter had trouble with her tables, I taught her the methods
I used and said that I didn't give a damn how she got the answer,
provided that she got the right one in under a second. She did,
and got a first-class engineering degree.

There's more than one way to kill a cat.

Nick says people can use a calculator, but I have yet to see anybody
doing this
in a supermarket, for example. Our two kids did arithmetic using a
calculator
at school. I don't think they even own one nowadays.


If you can't learn tables and can't learn the mathematical tricks,
then any sane person would buy one.


In the 1970s I saw people using slide rules in Californian supermarkets.
There
was a slide rule in the cutlery drawer in a house I rented.

Supermarkets are full of the insane.
I still see people buying Guinness Draft in 10 packs although the unit
price
for a 10 pack is more than the unit price for a 4 pack. In Morrisons the
10
packs were on sale in a different row to the individual cans. In one Co-op
they
were on sale immediately below the individual cans. The unit price is
provided
in both supermarkets.
http://www.tesco.com/groceries/produ...rchBox=Guiness
ATM in Tesco's a Guinness Draft 10 pack has a unit price of GBP3.07 a
Guinness
Draft 4 pack has a unit price of GBP2.90

Tell us about your tricks, Nick? I am sick of supermarket tricks :-)
--

Martin


My Whiskey was cheaper per Litre in the smaller 70cl bottles than the Litre
bottle.

Choc Digestive Biscuits were cheaper per pack than the twin pack of the same
thing.

Sprouts were cheaper loose than the packs

Mike
Of Jewish descent with short arms and deep pockets

--

....................................
Don't take life too seriously, you'll never get out alive
....................................




Bill Grey 27-01-2011 10:19 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

"Martin" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:22:15 -0000, "Bill Grey"
wrote:


Nick says people can use a calculator, but I have yet to see anybody
doing this
in a supermarket, for example. Our two kids did arithmetic using a
calculator
at school. I don't think they even own one nowadays.

If you can't learn tables and can't learn the mathematical tricks,
then any sane person would buy one.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.


It's no great encumberance to learn the times table at an early age - it
can
only help in future years.
There maybe more than one way to skin a cat, but it doesn't hurt to have
more than one string to your bow.

Children at the age that times tables were taught could readily absorb the
information, why deny them such a wonderful experience of learning a
technique that could serve them well in their future
lives.


They can also absorb new languages at the same age.
--

Martin

Definitely !

Bill



Mike Lyle[_1_] 27-01-2011 11:26 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:16:49 +0000, Sacha wrote:

On 2011-01-25 08:55:53 +0000, said:

[...]

It's one of those diagrams that looks like someone has put a bunch of coffee
mugs down on a sheet of paper, and all the people go in the circles. So the
coffee stain is 'people who are posh' and the tea stain is 'people who own
chickens' and the bit where the tea and coffee stains overlap is the posh
people who own chickens. And people outside both drink stains are people
who aren't posh and don't have chickens.
Then you can put a beer bottle down to make another circle that is 'people
who microwave their pork pies'


Cheeky! ;-)) I'm in at least 4 circles already - does Dante know about this?

That was infernally witty.

WIWAL, we called them "Euler circles", which makes me the oldest in
the thread so far.
[...]

--
Mike.

No Name 27-01-2011 11:27 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
Tom wrote:
I like* things like '75% fat free' ... meaning 25% fat? Eyww.

To digress, in California you can get egg-free omlettes and
fat-free sour cream. I have a container of the latter, but
couldn't figure out how to preserve and transport the former.


fat free sour cream I could possibly comprehend, but ... /egg/ free
omlettes?? My ghast is flabbered.

No Name 27-01-2011 11:32 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
Martin wrote:
To digress, in California you can get egg-free omlettes and
fat-free sour cream. I have a container of the latter, but
couldn't figure out how to preserve and transport the former.

Don't forget non-dairy product cheese on pizzas.


I have non-dairy cheese in the cupboard, and I have bought it in the past
during Lent. I have no problem with the idea of cheeseless cheese. It has
a different texture to 'real' cheese, but the flavour is provided by yeast
extract, iirc.
But a key point of omlettes is that eggy texture. Tofu has a 'fried egg
white' kind of texture. But it's not the same as omlette texture.

Hmm, perhaps we should move this over to a food ng instead.

No Name 27-01-2011 11:34 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
Bill Grey wrote:
There maybe more than one way to skin a cat, but it doesn't hurt to have
more than one string to your bow.


Skinning a cat with a bow seems a cruel and unnecessary approach.

No Name 27-01-2011 11:36 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
'Mike' wrote:
Sprouts were cheaper loose than the packs


That is fairly normal for veg, IME.

No Name 27-01-2011 11:38 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
Tom wrote:
But it would help if more than 20% of primary school
teachers knew the answer to "what is one plus two time three".


My answer would be "do you mean one plus two-times-three, or one-plus-two
times three?"

Do I win an apple?

Mike Lyle[_1_] 27-01-2011 11:38 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
On 25 Jan 2011 13:04:31 GMT, wrote:

wrote:
On the matter of multiplication tables, I didn't learn mine until
I was well into my teens, and 7x8 was always my bugbear - however,
I could work out the answer fast enough that the teachers never
realised, so I never got punished for it (sic). 7x8 = 2 x 7x4
or 7x8 = 7x7 + 7.


I think I do the last one, (7x7)+7


I suffer, too. I'm inclined to think an uncertain memory of 7x8 is so
widespread that there must be an identifiable cause: perhaps the
proximity of 6x9 has a sort of "twister" effect a little like a
tongue-twister?

--
Mike.

No Name 27-01-2011 11:41 AM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
Sacha wrote:
Yes, I've always thought it a big mistake that schools wait so long to
introduce a foreign language into the curriculum. I started learning
French when I was 4 and while no way am I fluent, I speak fairly well
for a foreigner. I just don't remember actually learning verbs because
we started so young and I was very lucky to have good French teachers
at all the schools I went to.


The boys' primary school have introduced French, the boys both got Spanish
and Urdu (!) sessions when at nursery.

'Mike'[_4_] 27-01-2011 12:20 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

"Janet" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"'Mike'" wrote in
:

I went to a Private School and they were very hot on the 3 x 'R's from
a very early age. Later, and as I had no desire to go into the Hotel
business like my parents, I went for an interview for an
Apprenticeship as a Marine Electrical Engineer During the interview I
was asked 'What are your Maths like?' 'Good I suppose', 'What are 7 x
8's?' and before he had finished I flashed '56'. I always remember
that because I surprised myself as to just how fast I was able to
recall it!!!!


That's arithmetic, not maths. (OK, a small subset of maths)


What do you expect, he's from a school that didn't teach grammar and
punctuation either.

Janet


Mmmmmmmeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeoooooooooooooooooooooooooo wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Sharp claws ????????????????

Who have you been taking lessons from ;-) ?????

god don't i wish I were as perfect as sum of the peeple on this site

Mike


--

....................................
Don't take life too seriously, you'll never get out alive
....................................





kay 27-01-2011 01:05 PM

What do you mean by "it worked"?

Do you mean "everybody could multiply relatively small numbers together in their heads" or do you mean"everybody had a good understanding of percentages, differentials, risk and the other concepts that are necessary in order to make decisions in everyday life"?

[email protected] 27-01-2011 03:56 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 
This is my last posting on this.


In article ,
Martin wrote:

Tell us about your tricks, Nick? I am sick of supermarket tricks :-)


I did. zx8 = 8x7 = 7x(4+4) = 7x7 = 10*7-3*7 and more. Also using
factorisation, so 44x75 = 11*(4*25)*3. Make a habit of that sort
of thing, and you will soon develop your own collection.

Also, using iteration (usually binary chop or interpolation) to do
division, square and cube roots etc.

Make a habit of such tricks and you will soon develop your own
suite. But mental arithmetic is no longer taught.


In article , Sacha wrote:

It's the learning by rote and repetition wot dunnit, imo.


Quite a few people can't do that at all - I never could and, as I say,
that was a punishable offence.

Then they started asking me what was the
'product' of 7 and 9 and I had no idea if they were adding it, dividing
it or multiplying it. Why couldn't it have remained "what's 7 times
9"? (Grump over) ;-)


Grin :-) Yes, if you don't know, it's not obvious. It's the result
of multiplying them.


In article ,
Mike Lyle wrote:

On the matter of multiplication tables, I didn't learn mine until
I was well into my teens, and 7x8 was always my bugbear - however,
I could work out the answer fast enough that the teachers never
realised, so I never got punished for it (sic). 7x8 = 2 x 7x4
or 7x8 = 7x7 + 7.


I think I do the last one, (7x7)+7


I suffer, too. I'm inclined to think an uncertain memory of 7x8 is so
widespread that there must be an identifiable cause: perhaps the
proximity of 6x9 has a sort of "twister" effect a little like a
tongue-twister?


I don't know the reason, but it does seem to be a widespread blind
spot. It would make an interesting research topic in psychology.



Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

Bill Grey 27-01-2011 03:57 PM

Hi im new :-) and fairly new to gardening :-S
 

"kay" wrote in message
...

'Martin[_2_ Wrote:
;911185']On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:40:08 +0000, kay
wrote:
-


But I think learning times tables by rote up to 12 x 12 is the wrong
place to start!-

It worked for my generation and they were taught to kids at an age when
they
could memorise stuff by rote quickly.
-


What do you mean by "it worked"?

Do you mean "everybody could multiply relatively small numbers together
in their heads" or do you mean"everybody had a good understanding of
percentages, differentials, risk and the other concepts that are
necessary in order to make decisions in everyday life"?




--
kay


Slow down! slow down, were talkng about children in infant school learning
their times tables /NOT/ percentages, differentials etc. That comes later,
considerably later.

Bill




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter