On 27/08/2011 19:36, Interloper wrote:
In a state of delirium , "The Medway Handyman" leapt upon an unsuspecting
keyboard and mistyped:

It seems I was 100& correct first time.

It seems you are hallucinating on the narcotic properties of the alkaloid
agricultural insecticide you are addicted to.


No, you are still a pompous ****.

--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

Unable to think up a new insult, "The Medway Handyman" reiterated:

No, you are still a pompous ****.

OK TMH, it's been fun bandying words with an archetypical, arrogant smoker,
but I can't justify any more of today in a battle of wits against an unarmed
adversary.

Stay healthy (and those around you who have to suffer your noxious
exhalation).

Anon,
--
Interloper

BTW, feel free to have the last word ;-)

On 27/08/2011 20:44, Interloper wrote:
Unable to think up a new insult, "The Medway Handyman" reiterated:

No, you are still a pompous ****.

OK TMH, it's been fun bandying words with an archetypical, arrogant smoker,
but I can't justify any more of today in a battle of wits against an unarmed
adversary.

Still being a pompous **** I see. At least you are consistent.


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On 27/08/2011 22:46, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 27/08/2011 20:44, Interloper wrote:
Unable to think up a new insult, "The Medway Handyman" reiterated:

No, you are still a pompous ****.

OK TMH, it's been fun bandying words with an archetypical, arrogant
smoker,
but I can't justify any more of today in a battle of wits against an
unarmed
adversary.

Still being a pompous **** I see. At least you are consistent.



So you think it's perfectly reasonable to inflict your smoking stench on
others?

A straight 'yes' will suffice.

--
R
Smoker's VOR

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:41:10 +0100, Ron Lowe wrote:

On 27/08/2011 22:46, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 27/08/2011 20:44, Interloper wrote:
Unable to think up a new insult, "The Medway Handyman" reiterated:

No, you are still a pompous ****.

OK TMH, it's been fun bandying words with an archetypical, arrogant
smoker,
but I can't justify any more of today in a battle of wits against an
unarmed
adversary.

Still being a pompous **** I see. At least you are consistent.



So you think it's perfectly reasonable to inflict your smoking stench on
others?

A straight 'yes' will suffice.

Of course he does.
He doesn't care that it causes other people to cough,make their eyes
sore and their clothes smell.
He doesn't care that it may start an asthmatic attack.
He's happy to ignore these things.
He's a smoker.

Fuschia wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:41:10 +0100, Ron Lowe wrote:
So you think it's perfectly reasonable to inflict your smoking stench on
others?

A straight 'yes' will suffice.

Of course he does.
He doesn't care that it causes other people to cough,make their eyes
sore and their clothes smell.
He doesn't care that it may start an asthmatic attack.
He's happy to ignore these things.
He's a smoker.

AKA a drug addict.

Nicotine has been shown to be more addictive than heroin in a
controlled, peer-reviewed, experiment involving American college students.
--
Tciao for Now!

John.

On 28/08/2011 22:36, John Williamson wrote:
Fuschia wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:41:10 +0100, Ron Lowe wrote:
So you think it's perfectly reasonable to inflict your smoking stench
on others?

A straight 'yes' will suffice.

Of course he does.
He doesn't care that it causes other people to cough,make their eyes
sore and their clothes smell.
He doesn't care that it may start an asthmatic attack.
He's happy to ignore these things.
He's a smoker.

AKA a drug addict.

AKA someone indulging in a perfectly legal activity.

Nicotine has been shown to be more addictive than heroin in a
controlled, peer-reviewed, experiment involving American college students.

Strange but true, many people make the positive choice to be smokers.


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On 29/08/2011 9:36 a.m., John Williamson wrote:
Fuschia wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:41:10 +0100, Ron Lowe wrote:
So you think it's perfectly reasonable to inflict your smoking stench
on others?

A straight 'yes' will suffice.

Of course he does.
He doesn't care that it causes other people to cough,make their eyes
sore and their clothes smell.
He doesn't care that it may start an asthmatic attack.
He's happy to ignore these things.
He's a smoker.

AKA a drug addict.

Nicotine has been shown to be more addictive than heroin in a
controlled, peer-reviewed, experiment involving American college students.

That's why they deserve our sympathy. OK, so someone made a bad choice
in starting to smoke (probably as a teenager). We all make bad choices
when young, it's just that this decision is very hard to reverse.

On 28/08/2011 20:45, Fuschia wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:41:10 +0100, Ron wrote:

On 27/08/2011 22:46, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 27/08/2011 20:44, Interloper wrote:
Unable to think up a new insult, "The Medway Handyman" reiterated:

No, you are still a pompous ****.

OK TMH, it's been fun bandying words with an archetypical, arrogant
smoker,
but I can't justify any more of today in a battle of wits against an
unarmed
adversary.

Still being a pompous **** I see. At least you are consistent.



So you think it's perfectly reasonable to inflict your smoking stench on
others?

A straight 'yes' will suffice.

Of course he does.

Oh no he doesn't.

He doesn't care that it causes other people to cough,make their eyes
sore and their clothes smell.

Nope, wrong again.

He doesn't care that it may start an asthmatic attack.

Like many other things can.

He's happy to ignore these things.

No I'm not.

He's a smoker.

You are a fascist.



--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:38:48 +0100, The Medway Handyman
wrote:


He doesn't care that it causes other people to cough,make their eyes
sore and their clothes smell.

Nope, wrong again.
You DO care? But you still inflict it on them. How nice of you.

He doesn't care that it may start an asthmatic attack.

Like many other things can.
Well done, a true statement at last.
Many things cause asthmatic attacks. But that doesn't give you the
right to cause one to an innocent victim.


He's happy to ignore these things.

No I'm not.
Wrong. You have just told us that you will continue inflicting your
smoke on others.


He's a smoker.

You are a fascist.
Ah. The final resort of the lost argument.

On 28/08/2011 19:41, Ron Lowe wrote:
On 27/08/2011 22:46, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 27/08/2011 20:44, Interloper wrote:
Unable to think up a new insult, "The Medway Handyman" reiterated:

No, you are still a pompous ****.

OK TMH, it's been fun bandying words with an archetypical, arrogant
smoker,
but I can't justify any more of today in a battle of wits against an
unarmed
adversary.

Still being a pompous **** I see. At least you are consistent.



So you think it's perfectly reasonable to inflict your smoking stench on
others?

No. I think its perfectly reasonable to have smoking & non smoking
areas. It's called 'choice'.

A straight 'yes' will suffice.

I think a straight '**** off' would suffice.

--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk