Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Another one six feet under
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 11:58:15 +0100, Sacha wrote:
On 2013-06-28 22:02:05 +0100, Judith said: snip Still - I will take the opportunity: my courgettes are doing really well!! Could I suggest you don't cross post please? I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Another one six feet under
On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote:
I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to as well'. You don't *need* to crosspost. Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to crosspost between URG and URC -- Rusty Hinge |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Another one six feet under
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:12:30 +0100, RustyHinge
wrote: On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote: I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to as well'. You don't *need* to crosspost. Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to crosspost between URG and URC Rubbish - the original post and claim was made in both groups - it was therefore sensible to reply in both groups. If you want to moan - then moan at the person who made the first cross-post. Why not get together with Sacha and change the charter? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Another one six feet under
Yes change the charter about pruning back previous postings to make them
easier to read, because those who should know better ignore the suggestion don't they? Mike (Sorry I don't have a business I can advertise in my signature) "Judith" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:12:30 +0100, RustyHinge wrote: On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote: I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to as well'. You don't *need* to crosspost. Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to crosspost between URG and URC Rubbish - the original post and claim was made in both groups - it was therefore sensible to reply in both groups. If you want to moan - then moan at the person who made the first cross-post. Why not get together with Sacha and change the charter? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Another one six feet under
On 30/06/13 19:10, Judith wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:12:30 +0100, RustyHinge wrote: On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote: I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to as well'. You don't *need* to crosspost. Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to crosspost between URG and URC Rubbish - the original post and claim was made in both groups - it was therefore sensible to reply in both groups. If you want to moan - then moan at the person who made the first cross-post. Why not get together with Sacha and change the charter? I wonder what weed would sprout if we buried the so-called 'Judith' six feet under? -- Rusty Hinge To err is human. To really foul things up requires a computer and the BOFH. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Another one six feet under
On 2013-11-15 23:54:18 +0000, RustyHinge said:
On 30/06/13 19:10, Judith wrote: On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:12:30 +0100, RustyHinge wrote: On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote: I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to as well'. You don't *need* to crosspost. Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to crosspost between URG and URC Rubbish - the original post and claim was made in both groups - it was therefore sensible to reply in both groups. If you want to moan - then moan at the person who made the first cross-post. Why not get together with Sacha and change the charter? I wonder what weed would sprout if we buried the so-called 'Judith' six feet under? You're replying to a post sent in late June, Rusty. For myself, I hope the problem has taken care of itself. ;-) -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.com South Devon |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Another one six feet under
On 16/11/13 18:25, sacha wrote:
On 2013-11-15 23:54:18 +0000, RustyHinge said: On 30/06/13 19:10, Judith wrote: On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:12:30 +0100, RustyHinge wrote: On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote: I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to as well'. You don't *need* to crosspost. Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to crosspost between URG and URC Rubbish - the original post and claim was made in both groups - it was therefore sensible to reply in both groups. If you want to moan - then moan at the person who made the first cross-post. Why not get together with Sacha and change the charter? I wonder what weed would sprout if we buried the so-called 'Judith' six feet under? You're replying to a post sent in late June, Rusty. For myself, I hope the problem has taken care of itself. ;-) Well, some posts in the thread has miraculously appeared in the undead section at the bottom of the list. And, er, because it was there. -- Rusty Hinge To err is human. To really foul things up requires a computer and the BOFH. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Another one six feet under
RustyHinge wrote:
Well, some posts in the thread has miraculously appeared in the undead section at the bottom of the list. This sometimes happens because of a server fart. And, er, because it was there. Thank you sir Edmund! In the U.S., crosspost trimming (always a good idea if some of the groups are unconnected with the others) is sometimes called "DeBoursification," after a kook of that name. Who has been silent for some years due to being dead for tax reasons. -- Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic Zone 5/4 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Another one six feet under
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Another one six feet under
On 16/11/13 20:58, Chris Hogg wrote:
Curious that it should re-emerge here now, as a 'Judith' in uk.d-i-y is currently distancing herself from another 'Judith' who is apparently using her ID in that group. I think thr real Judith has a stalker. -- Rusty Hinge To err is human. To really foul things up requires a computer and the BOFH. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Another one six feet under
On 2013-06-29 18:52:37 +0100, Judith in England said:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 11:58:15 +0100, Sacha wrote: On 2013-06-28 22:02:05 +0100, Judith said: snip Still - I will take the opportunity: my courgettes are doing really well!! Could I suggest you don't cross post please? I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. Not really. It could be answered in the group in which the problem originated. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.com South Devon www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Another one six feet under
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:07:22 +0100, Sacha wrote:
On 2013-06-29 18:52:37 +0100, Judith in England said: On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 11:58:15 +0100, Sacha wrote: On 2013-06-28 22:02:05 +0100, Judith said: snip Still - I will take the opportunity: my courgettes are doing really well!! Could I suggest you don't cross post please? I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. Not really. It could be answered in the group in which the problem originated. Rubbish - the reply was intended to be read in both groups as it was a reply to the original post. People who had read the original post, could then read my response irrespective of the group they were reading. Why not get together with Rusty Hinge and get the charter changed to prohibit cross-posting; then you will really be able to moan at people. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Whats the weather been like for the last six months? | Australia | |||
Six-Pack's Tag said Early Girl, Fruit is Cherry Tomatoes........ | Edible Gardening | |||
Six-foot tall tomato plant ... | Gardening | |||
A new garden in six weeks - HELP! | United Kingdom |