|
Do plants have brain?
Hi,
It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. Is it true? Rajinder |
Do plants have brain?
Ch. Rajinder Nijjhar Jatt wrote:
: Hi, : : It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have : "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. : : Is it true? : : Rajinder Well they're more intelligent than President Bush but I don' think there's a lot in it |
Do plants have brain?
Hi, It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. Is it true? Well they are intelligent enough to cover themselves with solar panels, anyway . . . Andy |
Do plants have brain?
Rajinder wrote in message It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. Is it true? Well I know they react to damage, compete with others, and seem to have a will to live their time, so there might be something controlling these processes even if just at the cell level. -- Regards Bob Use a useful Screen Saver... http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ and find intelligent life amongst the stars |
Do plants have brain?
"Robert" wrote in message after Rajinder... : : It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have : "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. : : Is it true? : Well they're more intelligent than President Bush but I don' think there's a lot in it Hmmm, after 9/11 everyone in the world expected another similar terrorist atrocity in the US within months, it hasn't happened yet. Why? Because a lot of the terrorist types are now engaged with well trained and well armed soldiers in Iraq and a lot of the "terrorists" are being killed as opposed to US civilians. So is Bush an idiot or a damn good chess player? -- Regards Bob Use a useful Screen Saver... http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ and find intelligent life amongst the stars |
Do plants have brain?
Somebody has been pulling your leg.
The answer is NO. Plants don't even have rudimentary nervous systems yet alone the need for a brain to control one. "Ch. Rajinder Nijjhar Jatt" wrote in message news:CUxgc.11$mv.3@newsfe1-win... Hi, It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. Is it true? Rajinder |
Do plants have brain?
Unfortunately Dubaya does have a rudimentary nervous system and a brain,
albeit a poorly developed one. The problem is when he tries to chew gum and make important decisions at the same time he gets confused. "Robert" wrote in message ... Ch. Rajinder Nijjhar Jatt wrote: : Hi, : : It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have : "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. : : Is it true? : : Rajinder Well they're more intelligent than President Bush but I don' think there's a lot in it |
Do plants have brain?
"Robert" wrote in message after Rajinder... : : It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have : "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. : : Is it true? : Well they're more intelligent than President Bush but I don' think there's a lot in it Hmmm, after 9/11 everyone in the world expected another similar terrorist atrocity in the US within months, it hasn't happened yet. Why? Because a lot of the terrorist types are now engaged with well trained and well armed soldiers in Iraq and a lot of the "terrorists" are being killed as opposed to US civilians. So is Bush an idiot or a damn good chess player? He is if he has you convinced that he didn't do "9/11" himself . . . http://www.911sharethetruth.com/ Andy |
Do plants have brain?
Plants can, and do, respond to stimuli. However this is only an indication
that they are alive and in no way suggests the presence of a brain in the way that we understand. Only intentionally silly questions are deemed silly. Best Wishes Brian "Ch. Rajinder Nijjhar Jatt" wrote in message news:CUxgc.11$mv.3@newsfe1-win... Hi, It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. Is it true? Rajinder |
Do plants have brain?
Response to stimuli does not require a nervous system or a brain. Single
celled organisms respond to stimuli. Even inorganic substances can respond to stimuli. Ice melts when you apply heat!! As if that's not enough, liquid water will even boil when enough heat is applied!! "Brian" wrote in message ... Plants can, and do, respond to stimuli. However this is only an indication that they are alive and in no way suggests the presence of a brain in the way that we understand. Only intentionally silly questions are deemed silly. Best Wishes Brian "Ch. Rajinder Nijjhar Jatt" wrote in message news:CUxgc.11$mv.3@newsfe1-win... Hi, It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. Is it true? Rajinder |
Do plants have brain?
"Andy Hunt" wrote in message news:NfDgc.707$Gq3.687@newsfe1-win... : : : "Robert" wrote in message after Rajinder... : : : : It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have : : "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. : : : : Is it true? : : : : Well they're more intelligent than President Bush but I don' think : there's : a : lot in it : : Hmmm, after 9/11 everyone in the world expected another similar terrorist : atrocity in the US within months, it hasn't happened yet. Why? Because a : lot : of the terrorist types are now engaged with well trained and well armed : soldiers in Iraq and a lot of the "terrorists" are being killed as opposed : to US civilians. : So is Bush an idiot or a damn good chess player? : : He is if he has you convinced that he didn't do "9/11" himself . . . : : http://www.911sharethetruth.com/ : : Andy : And the world is a far more dangerous place now, after the bumbling b's have invaded : |
Do plants have brain?
I dont care, I will still talk to my plants.
Kev, |
Do plants have brain?
Xref: kermit uk.rec.gardening:197530
Well, isn't that special? When you think they are talking back is when you really know you have a problem!!! "Kevin Groves" wrote in message ... I dont care, I will still talk to my plants. Kev, |
Do plants have brain?
So how do plants know which way is 'up', then, when they are germinating in
the dark . . . ? Does this not imply some sort of perceptive and decision-making capability, albeit on a fairly mundane level? Andy "Cereus-validus" wrote in message . .. Well, isn't that special? When you think they are talking back is when you really know you have a problem!!! "Kevin Groves" wrote in message ... I dont care, I will still talk to my plants. Kev, |
Do plants have brain?
In article yrOgc.45$oI2.0@newsfe1-win, "Andy Hunt" writes: | So how do plants know which way is 'up', then, when they are germinating in | the dark . . . ? Does this not imply some sort of perceptive and | decision-making capability, albeit on a fairly mundane level? No. It slightly goes against the grain to recommend anything by Richard Dawkins (he is widely regarded as a pain in the a*** by other scientists), but his books do explain how this for of thing develops without consciousness. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
Do plants have brain?
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:04:11 +0100, Andy Hunt wrote:
So how do plants know which way is 'up', then, when they are germinating in the dark . . . ? Does this not imply some sort of perceptive and decision-making capability, albeit on a fairly mundane level? Gravity, mostly. Imagine a white T-shirt you've just soaked in a colourful dye. Hang the shirt up and the dye will run to the bottom creating a gradient. in the same way, there will be a gradient of various hormones throughout the plant from tip to root, from leaf tip tip stem etc. To (over) generalise a bit, the hormones responsible (a group called auxins IIRC) for root growth also sink to the bottom of the plant, through the cells. Thus roots grow at the bottom (where there is more root-growth hormone), and shoots grow a the top (where there is less root-growth hormone....). You can show this by cutting small cubes of (certain) plant tissue and whichever way you put them down they will grow roots at the bottom. Turn them round, then they'll start growing roots from the new bottom surface. As roots tend to grow first, it's possible in fact to create a cube of plant tissue with roots growing out of all six sides, if you're bored. -- Tim C. |
Do plants have brain?
On 19 Apr 2004 11:15:54 GMT, Nick Maclaren wrote:
In article yrOgc.45$oI2.0@newsfe1-win, "Andy Hunt" writes: | So how do plants know which way is 'up', then, when they are germinating in | the dark . . . ? Does this not imply some sort of perceptive and | decision-making capability, albeit on a fairly mundane level? No. It slightly goes against the grain to recommend anything by Richard Dawkins (he is widely regarded as a pain in the a*** by other scientists), but his books do explain how this for of thing develops without consciousness. Regards, Nick Maclaren. Any textbook on basic botany will do as well. Dawkins does tend to take a good idea and stretch it to the limit. But I think his ideas are generally sound. Thought provoking at the least. Andy, Dawkin's book The Blind Watchmaker is a good example of what Nick suggested. -- Tim C. |
Do plants have brain?
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:04:11 +0100, Andy Hunt wrote:
So how do plants know which way is 'up', then, when they are germinating in the dark . . . ? Does this not imply some sort of perceptive and decision-making capability, albeit on a fairly mundane level? Here's a link : http://www.biology-online.org/3/5_plant_hormones.htm -- Tim C. |
Do plants have brain?
So how do plants know which way is 'up', then, when they are germinating in the dark . . . ? Does this not imply some sort of perceptive and decision-making capability, albeit on a fairly mundane level? Here's a link : http://www.biology-online.org/3/5_plant_hormones.htm Fair enough . . . but I do find myself wondering if biology is a function of consciousness, or vice versa . . . Andy "The bridge flows, not the river" - Zen proverb |
Do plants have brain?
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:59:53 +0100, Andy Hunt wrote:
So how do plants know which way is 'up', then, when they are germinating in the dark . . . ? Does this not imply some sort of perceptive and decision-making capability, albeit on a fairly mundane level? Here's a link : http://www.biology-online.org/3/5_plant_hormones.htm Fair enough . . . but I do find myself wondering if biology is a function of consciousness, or vice versa . . . You don't have to be conscious to be a biologist. Seriously, who can say if a plant or animal are conscious? Scientists can't even agree amongst themselves what consciousness is, let alone being able to tell if other organisms possess it or not. I'm pretty sure about bacteria and some fungi, but I often wonder about some humans. -- Tim C. |
Do plants have brain?
Cereus-validus wrote:
Well, isn't that special? When you think they are talking back is when you really know you have a problem!!! Thankfully I don't hear voices and I have vivid memories of Day Of The Triffids from my childhood.... Kev, |
Do plants have brain?
The message CUxgc.11$mv.3@newsfe1-win
from "Ch. Rajinder Nijjhar Jatt" contains these words: It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. Some plants will react to being touched by rapidly becoming flaccid, so some sort of nervous system could be involved. -- Rusty Open the creaking gate to make a horrid.squeak, then lower the foobar. http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/ |
Do plants have brain?
Hmmmm.
You obviously slept all through the course on basic botany. Read up on geotropism. "Andy Hunt" wrote in message news:yrOgc.45$oI2.0@newsfe1-win... So how do plants know which way is 'up', then, when they are germinating in the dark . . . ? Does this not imply some sort of perceptive and decision-making capability, albeit on a fairly mundane level? Andy "Cereus-validus" wrote in message . .. Well, isn't that special? When you think they are talking back is when you really know you have a problem!!! "Kevin Groves" wrote in message ... I dont care, I will still talk to my plants. Kev, |
Do plants have brain?
Not so Paul Atreides.
The Mimosa plant quickly folds up its leaves because of a rapid drop in water pressure akin to wilting. No nervous system is needed at all. You really should read up on your basic botany instead making wild flights of fantasy. The truth is far more interesting. "Jaques d'Alltrades" wrote in message ... The message CUxgc.11$mv.3@newsfe1-win from "Ch. Rajinder Nijjhar Jatt" contains these words: It may seem a silly question but I have heard that the plants have "lesser brain", the seat of instincts. Some plants will react to being touched by rapidly becoming flaccid, so some sort of nervous system could be involved. -- Rusty Open the creaking gate to make a horrid.squeak, then lower the foobar. http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/ |
Do plants have brain?
In article , "Cereus-validus" writes: | | The Mimosa plant quickly folds up its leaves because of a rapid drop in | water pressure akin to wilting. No nervous system is needed at all. | | You really should read up on your basic botany instead making wild flights | of fantasy. The truth is far more interesting. It would a hell of a lot easier to see what you are wittering about if you didn't both top post and leave the previous posting unedited. Please do not be so lazy and inconsiderate. Wilting is (largely) a loss of turgidity due to the water evaporating - i.e. a direct effect. Mimosa pudica's response to touch necessarily involves a more complex mechanism; in particular, the response is not entirely local, which implies some degree of communication. And nerves are nothing more than communication links. A far better analogy is the mechanism used for water transport between the roots and leaves of a tree. No nervous system is involved, but it is NOT as simple a mechanism as simple wilting. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
Do plants have brain?
Not so Paul Atreides. For he IS the Kwisatz Haderach . . . The Mimosa plant quickly folds up its leaves because of a rapid drop in water pressure akin to wilting. No nervous system is needed at all. Venus flytrap? You really should read up on your basic botany instead making wild flights of fantasy. The truth is far more interesting. An old teacher of mine once pointed out that there can never be such a thing as "extra-sensory perception", because perception by its very nature requires sensation. Arguments for the behaviour of plants being biology-based can be used equally for people too - a scientific approach will boil our every action, emotion and decision down to electrochemical processes in our brain, just as the analysis of a car engine will reveal all the different moving parts and how they fit together. But if you look for the _velocity_ in the engine, you won't find it, just as if you look for the _soul_ in a person's body you won't find it. Similarly, if you look for the _growth_ in a plant, you won't find it . . . Andy "A ten-year-old child could understand this. Go out and find me a ten-year-old child" - Marx |
Do plants have brain?
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:12:46 +0100, Andy Hunt wrote:
Similarly, if you look for the _growth_ in a plant, you won't find it . . . I know what you mean, but as I said elsewhere, who decides what is consciousness? And how? Boiling it down again you end up with "I think, therefore I am" and that's all you can prove. Well, *YOU* can't prove it, because you're just a figment of my imagination, but *I* can. What is your personal definition of consciousness? Are viruses conscious? Bacteria? Fungi? Algae? Apple-trees? Sponges? Jellyfish? Octopuses? Fish? Humans? If some of these are conscious then why? And why not the others? That's the hard bit; trying to identify the boiled-down chemical processes which make something self-aware. Or even to reach a consensus on what is actually meant by consciousness. -- Tim C. |
Do plants have brain?
Why don't you go back to contemplating your navel, Tiny Tim, take your New
Age drivel to some newsgroup more appropriate where they might take you silliness seriously and not show everyone in this one just how flaky you are? If you took a poll here, the overwhelming majority would say you and your twinkie friends lack any consciousness. I would recommend you stay away from woodlands lest you be attacked by squirrels. Those critters already know what you are! "Tim Challenger" "timothy(dot)challenger(at)apk(dot)at" wrote in message s.com... On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:12:46 +0100, Andy Hunt wrote: Similarly, if you look for the _growth_ in a plant, you won't find it . . . I know what you mean, but as I said elsewhere, who decides what is consciousness? And how? Boiling it down again you end up with "I think, therefore I am" and that's all you can prove. Well, *YOU* can't prove it, because you're just a figment of my imagination, but *I* can. What is your personal definition of consciousness? Are viruses conscious? Bacteria? Fungi? Algae? Apple-trees? Sponges? Jellyfish? Octopuses? Fish? Humans? If some of these are conscious then why? And why not the others? That's the hard bit; trying to identify the boiled-down chemical processes which make something self-aware. Or even to reach a consensus on what is actually meant by consciousness. -- Tim C. |
Do plants have brain?
The topic has been studies in detail many times over the years, even by
Charles Darwin, and there is no doubt that the various responses to stimuli by plants have nothing at all to do with any type of intelligence. The topic is the subject of many books and all anyone need to do is read them. If one had been awake during any basic botany class they would know the truth about plant physiology. That some New Age clowns are too lazy to actually do any real research into the subject show just how ignorant and stupid they really are and that they should not be given any serious consideration at all. They have been watching too much bad sci-fi on TV. They are clueless about the scientific method and how to apply it to even the most basic problems. In any case, the extent of their ineptitude has noting to do with gardening. "Andy Hunt" wrote in message news:2O6hc.20874$4N3.2404@newsfe1-win... Not so Paul Atreides. For he IS the Kwisatz Haderach . . . The Mimosa plant quickly folds up its leaves because of a rapid drop in water pressure akin to wilting. No nervous system is needed at all. Venus flytrap? You really should read up on your basic botany instead making wild flights of fantasy. The truth is far more interesting. An old teacher of mine once pointed out that there can never be such a thing as "extra-sensory perception", because perception by its very nature requires sensation. Arguments for the behaviour of plants being biology-based can be used equally for people too - a scientific approach will boil our every action, emotion and decision down to electrochemical processes in our brain, just as the analysis of a car engine will reveal all the different moving parts and how they fit together. But if you look for the _velocity_ in the engine, you won't find it, just as if you look for the _soul_ in a person's body you won't find it. Similarly, if you look for the _growth_ in a plant, you won't find it . . . Andy "A ten-year-old child could understand this. Go out and find me a ten-year-old child" - Marx |
Do plants have brain?
Nick Maclaren wrote:
In article yrOgc.45$oI2.0@newsfe1-win, "Andy Hunt" writes: | So how do plants know which way is 'up', then, when they are germinating in | the dark . . . ? Does this not imply some sort of perceptive and | decision-making capability, albeit on a fairly mundane level? No. How does water know which way is down when it is running down a slope? How does a compass know to point north? No. It slightly goes against the grain to recommend anything by Richard Dawkins (he is widely regarded as a pain in the a*** by other scientists) Not by any scientists I know. I don't know many zoologists and biologists though, so maybe in his own area he not so well thought off. Is there a reason for this, has he upset them in some way or is it just because he's famous? , but his books do explain how this for of thing develops without consciousness. They do indeed. Roger Penrose also wrote a couple of excellent book on conciousness called "Shadows of the Mind" and "The Emperor's New Mind". |
Do plants have brain?
No doubt.
http://www.friesian.com/penrose.htm http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v2/ps...6-moravec.html But what does it have to do with gardening? "Steve Haigh" wrote in message ... Nick Maclaren wrote: In article yrOgc.45$oI2.0@newsfe1-win, "Andy Hunt" writes: | So how do plants know which way is 'up', then, when they are germinating in | the dark . . . ? Does this not imply some sort of perceptive and | decision-making capability, albeit on a fairly mundane level? No. How does water know which way is down when it is running down a slope? How does a compass know to point north? No. It slightly goes against the grain to recommend anything by Richard Dawkins (he is widely regarded as a pain in the a*** by other scientists) Not by any scientists I know. I don't know many zoologists and biologists though, so maybe in his own area he not so well thought off. Is there a reason for this, has he upset them in some way or is it just because he's famous? , but his books do explain how this for of thing develops without consciousness. They do indeed. Roger Penrose also wrote a couple of excellent book on conciousness called "Shadows of the Mind" and "The Emperor's New Mind". |
Do plants have brain?
Cereus-validus wrote:
No doubt. http://www.friesian.com/penrose.htm http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v2/ps...6-moravec.html But what does it have to do with gardening? "Steve Haigh" wrote in message ... Nick Maclaren wrote: In article yrOgc.45$oI2.0@newsfe1-win, "Andy Hunt" writes: | So how do plants know which way is 'up', then, when they are germinating in | the dark . . . ? Does this not imply some sort of perceptive and | decision-making capability, albeit on a fairly mundane level? No. How does water know which way is down when it is running down a slope? How does a compass know to point north? No. It slightly goes against the grain to recommend anything by Richard Dawkins (he is widely regarded as a pain in the a*** by other scientists) Not by any scientists I know. I don't know many zoologists and biologists though, so maybe in his own area he not so well thought off. Is there a reason for this, has he upset them in some way or is it just because he's famous? , but his books do explain how this for of thing develops without consciousness. They do indeed. Roger Penrose also wrote a couple of excellent book on conciousness called "Shadows of the Mind" and "The Emperor's New Mind". I'm not sure, but then this thread appears to have nothing to do with gardening anyway. After reading Penrose's books I'm not even sure I have a brain. But I must do, 'cos I don't top post;-) |
Do plants have brain?
In article ,
Steve Haigh wrote: No. It slightly goes against the grain to recommend anything by Richard Dawkins (he is widely regarded as a pain in the a*** by other scientists) Not by any scientists I know. I don't know many zoologists and biologists though, so maybe in his own area he not so well thought off. Is there a reason for this, has he upset them in some way or is it just because he's famous? It is because of his self-publicity and dogmatism. , but his books do explain how this for of thing develops without consciousness. They do indeed. Even his opponents admit that he is not a fool, his ideas are not demented, and he can write fairly well. Roger Penrose also wrote a couple of excellent book on conciousness called "Shadows of the Mind" and "The Emperor's New Mind". Er, watch out. He is widely regarded as having flipped his lid when he retired from real mathematics to ride his hobbyhorses. Those books may LOOK good but, if you know enough about the area to tell flannelling from science, you are less impressed. In particular, his claim that human consciousness is not subject to the Turing/Goedel limits is unjustified and his evidence fallacious. And his theory of quantum gravity being the source of consciousness is reminiscent of L. Ron Hubbard. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
Do plants have brain?
That some New Age clowns Who are these people of whom you speak? The old teacher of mine to whom I was referring was a man called Stafford Beer. If you do a 'google' search, you'll soon discover that your label is somewhat wide of the mark. are too lazy to actually do any real research into the subject show just how ignorant and stupid they really are and that they should not be given any serious consideration at all. They have been watching too much bad sci-fi on TV. They are clueless about the scientific method and how to apply it to even the most basic problems. I am very well aware of the theory of geotropism etc, although you somewhat dangerously assume that I am not. I got my 'A' at 'O' level biology, and do still recall the subject matter. I believe wholeheartedly in science as a tool of consciousness, but at the same time I'm very much aware that the reductionist nature of science can lead us into a 'false sense of obscurity'. A plant is an autopoietic viable system which has the requisite variety to comprehend and adapt to its environment in the same way that a human being has. Both systems necessarily have ways of perceiving that environment, and ways of reacting to that environment. The biological details may differ, but the purpose is the same. I was merely pointing out that biology isn't necessarily the whole story. Then again, I do believe in a "Creator", so I possibly _do_ belong to the lunatic "New Age" fringe of which you are so fond. In any case, the extent of their ineptitude has noting to do with gardening. Ever read the parable of the tares . . . ? Or of the vineyard? There are some pretty decent gardening tips in the NT if you ask me! Roll on the great harvest . . . Andy |
Do plants have brain?
We will miss you most of all, Scarecrow.
Any way you look at it, this newsgroup is about gardening and not you nor what you believe. "Andy Hunt" wrote in message news:_1ehc.20964$4N3.18169@newsfe1-win... That some New Age clowns Who are these people of whom you speak? The old teacher of mine to whom I was referring was a man called Stafford Beer. If you do a 'google' search, you'll soon discover that your label is somewhat wide of the mark. are too lazy to actually do any real research into the subject show just how ignorant and stupid they really are and that they should not be given any serious consideration at all. They have been watching too much bad sci-fi on TV. They are clueless about the scientific method and how to apply it to even the most basic problems. I am very well aware of the theory of geotropism etc, although you somewhat dangerously assume that I am not. I got my 'A' at 'O' level biology, and do still recall the subject matter. I believe wholeheartedly in science as a tool of consciousness, but at the same time I'm very much aware that the reductionist nature of science can lead us into a 'false sense of obscurity'. A plant is an autopoietic viable system which has the requisite variety to comprehend and adapt to its environment in the same way that a human being has. Both systems necessarily have ways of perceiving that environment, and ways of reacting to that environment. The biological details may differ, but the purpose is the same. I was merely pointing out that biology isn't necessarily the whole story. Then again, I do believe in a "Creator", so I possibly _do_ belong to the lunatic "New Age" fringe of which you are so fond. In any case, the extent of their ineptitude has noting to do with gardening. Ever read the parable of the tares . . . ? Or of the vineyard? There are some pretty decent gardening tips in the NT if you ask me! Roll on the great harvest . . . Andy |
Do plants have brain?
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:50:02 GMT, Cereus-validus wrote:
Why don't you go back to contemplating your navel, Tiny Tim, take your New Age drivel to some newsgroup more appropriate where they might take you silliness seriously and not show everyone in this one just how flaky you are? If you took a poll here, the overwhelming majority would say you and your twinkie friends lack any consciousness. I would recommend you stay away from woodlands lest you be attacked by squirrels. Those critters already know what you are! "Tim Challenger" "timothy(dot)challenger(at)apk(dot)at" wrote in message s.com... On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:12:46 +0100, Andy Hunt wrote: Similarly, if you look for the _growth_ in a plant, you won't find it . . . I know what you mean, but as I said elsewhere, who decides what is consciousness? And how? Boiling it down again you end up with "I think, therefore I am" and that's all you can prove. Well, *YOU* can't prove it, because you're just a figment of my imagination, but *I* can. What is your personal definition of consciousness? Are viruses conscious? Bacteria? Fungi? Algae? Apple-trees? Sponges? Jellyfish? Octopuses? Fish? Humans? If some of these are conscious then why? And why not the others? That's the hard bit; trying to identify the boiled-down chemical processes which make something self-aware. Or even to reach a consensus on what is actually meant by consciousness. -- Tim C. What *are* you talking about? Me New Age? That's a laugh. What makes you think that? -- Tim C. |
Do plants have brain?
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 19:27:42 +0100, Andy Hunt wrote:
That some New Age clowns Who are these people of whom you speak? The old teacher of mine to whom I was referring was a man called Stafford Beer. If you do a 'google' search, you'll soon discover that your label is somewhat wide of the mark. He seems to think it's me. :-) -- Tim C. |
Do plants have brain?
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:12:21 GMT, Cereus-validus wrote:
We will miss you most of all, Scarecrow. Any way you look at it, this newsgroup is about gardening and not you nor what you believe. But then at the last count, out of 34 posts in this thread 10 of them are from you. In fact, you posted most in this thread. And why the sudden switch from the apparent intelligence in your earlier posts to blatant insults? Run out of ideas? -- Tim C. |
Do plants have brain?
Xref: kermit uk.rec.gardening:198186
Why are you so paranoid, Challenged Tim? Are you afraid that the plants might be talking about you behind your back? You have been counting the number of postings on this silly thread? Your time would be much better spent tending to your garden, don't you think? "Tim Challenger" "timothy(dot)challenger(at)apk(dot)at" wrote in message s.com... On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:12:21 GMT, Cereus-validus wrote: We will miss you most of all, Scarecrow. Any way you look at it, this newsgroup is about gardening and not you nor what you believe. But then at the last count, out of 34 posts in this thread 10 of them are from you. In fact, you posted most in this thread. And why the sudden switch from the apparent intelligence in your earlier posts to blatant insults? Run out of ideas? -- Tim C. |
Do plants have brain?
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:34:30 GMT, Cereus-validus wrote:
Why are you so paranoid, Challenged Tim? Are you afraid that the plants might be talking about you behind your back? You have been counting the number of postings on this silly thread? Your time would be much better spent tending to your garden, don't you think? Absolutely, but as I'm at work.... -- Tim C. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter