Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hedging Questions
Hi
We have a boundary which is overlooking (we are higher up a hill) a small new housing development and we want to grow a nice thick hedge for privacy and obscuring as one of the houses is almost touching the boundary and at an annoying angle too! We had originally thought about hornbeam all the way down (the boundary is a verge leading quite a long way to the end of a private drive). Then when we saw the house taking shape and looming menacingly we then thought, "no, we definitely want something thick, evergreen and quite tall" haha! We would just put the evergreens as far as the houses extend and then put in some hornbeam and possibly an area of mixed hollies at the bottom where the verge thickens out so there will be a mixture of planting not just monoblock! I've been looking at different options as we need to get this planted soon so that it can establish this year. The conditions are fairly windy but I don't think excessive, I believe the soil must be acidic as there are lots of rhodies, azaleas and blue hydrangeas in our and other gardens nearby. We could go for the much detested leylandii but I would really prefer to get trees which are better behaved, can be left with little trimming required and stop growing at about 15-20ft max *but* don't take 15 years to get there! What would people reckon on the speed and quality of growth of the 'Pembury Blue' or other similar columnar evergreens - what would meet our needs? Thanks for any advice or suggestions. Lynda |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Think laterally. What about buddleia, alternating with holly? The former is very fast and can be pruned ad lib as the holly grows. It may not be evergreen, but isn't bare for long, and grows to 20' or so. I can't guarantee it will love acid soil (though it seems to grow everywhere), but holly certainly likes it. And holly isn't a very slow grower. People with acid soils may be able to think of an alternative to buddleia. It is a mistake to try to combine permanence with quick establishment. Plants don't grow like that. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Lynda Thornton
writes 've been looking at different options as we need to get this planted soon so that it can establish this year. The conditions are fairly windy but I don't think excessive, I believe the soil must be acidic as there are lots of rhodies, azaleas and blue hydrangeas in our and other gardens nearby. We could go for the much detested leylandii but I would really prefer to get trees which are better behaved, can be left with little trimming required and stop growing at about 15-20ft max *but* don't take 15 years to get there! What would people reckon on the speed and quality of growth of the 'Pembury Blue' or other similar columnar evergreens - what would meet our needs? Any of this may fall foul of legislation if your new neighbours are not happy about the hedge. Remember, if you are above them, the hedge will feel far more overpowering from their side. -- Kay "Do not insult the crocodile until you have crossed the river" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Kay
writes In article , Lynda Thornton writes 've been looking at different options as we need to get this planted soon so that it can establish this year. The conditions are fairly windy but I don't think excessive, I believe the soil must be acidic as there are lots of rhodies, azaleas and blue hydrangeas in our and other gardens nearby. We could go for the much detested leylandii but I would really prefer to get trees which are better behaved, can be left with little trimming required and stop growing at about 15-20ft max *but* don't take 15 years to get there! What would people reckon on the speed and quality of growth of the 'Pembury Blue' or other similar columnar evergreens - what would meet our needs? Any of this may fall foul of legislation if your new neighbours are not happy about the hedge. Remember, if you are above them, the hedge will feel far more overpowering from their side. Hi I understand the implications of high hedges and I don't want to cause aggravation to other people just as I wouldn't want to be aggravated by their actions. We are still open to suggestions and that is why I wanted to avoid the use of leylandii (our neighbour next door has already planted some leylandii along part of the boundary and if we planted some it would be continuing along this line). I believe the whole issue stems from loss of light and enjoyment of a garden caused by a high hedge, anwhere from 6ft upwards. I might check with our local Planning Officer about our particular situation as we would need a hedge higher than 6ft due to the particular hillside circumstances along with the issue of our being overlooked by this new house, which, although not covered by any particular legislation as I understand, could be a factor in allowing higher hedges than usual. Lynda |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Beech or Hornbeam for hedging - is there much difference? Plus, holly hedging opinions please! | United Kingdom | |||
I'm learning, but Questions, Questions, Questions | Orchids | |||
questions, questions, questions... | Ponds | |||
Ceanothus for hedging? | United Kingdom | |||
Hedging | United Kingdom |