In article ,
Kay writes:
|
| Taken with your other post, it suggests either the Normans were using
| 'un porc' for the pig and we picked up it up for the meat, and that
| French moved on to 'cochon' later, or that the normans used 'porc' for
| the meat only. Either way around fits into the pattern.

But the French HAVEN'T moved on to 'cochon'! 'porc' is a near-synonym.
A search indicates that was true in 1694. 'porceau' then as now is
a young pig.

| What about 'poultry'? Am I right in thinking it's derived from 'poulet'?

Nearly. 'poultier' hence 'poulter' - a person who cared for the
poultry. They have the same root as 'poulet'.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

In article , Nick Maclaren
wrote:


But the French HAVEN'T moved on to 'cochon'! 'porc' is a near-synonym.
A search indicates that was true in 1694. 'porceau' then as now is
a young pig.

Thanks Nick.

I think I said this when I first mentioned the word.

'un porc' - a pig.

L

--
Remover the rock from the email address

In article , Lazarus
Cooke writes
In article , Nick Maclaren
wrote:


But the French HAVEN'T moved on to 'cochon'! 'porc' is a near-synonym.
A search indicates that was true in 1694. 'porceau' then as now is
a young pig.

Thanks Nick.

I think I said this when I first mentioned the word.

'un porc' - a pig.

You didn't - you just mentioned 'un porc' but didn't say whether it was
the pig or the meat ... 'cos I asked you that question in the next post
;-)

--
Kay
"Do not insult the crocodile until you have crossed the river"

In article , Kay
wrote:

I think I said this when I first mentioned the word.

'un porc' - a pig.

You didn't - you just mentioned 'un porc' but didn't say whether it was
the pig or the meat ... 'cos I asked you that question in the next post
;-)

The french have a word for it: "Touche" (sorry - keyboard bust so I
can't do the accent).

L

--
Remover the rock from the email address