Janet Baraclough wrote:

This was in Scotland, YMMV. It's only a phone call to find out.

Actually that was where I started before posing here but the woman that
I spoke to seemed to think that section 1 applied to everything and
couldn't explain the reason for section 3. So, disillusioned with the
staff at the building control office I thought I would try here
instead.

Andrew

On 3 Jun 2005 02:15:24 -0700, wrote:

Janet Baraclough wrote:

This was in Scotland, YMMV. It's only a phone call to find out.

Actually that was where I started before posing here but the woman that
I spoke to seemed to think that section 1 applied to everything and
couldn't explain the reason for section 3. So, disillusioned with the
staff at the building control office I thought I would try here
instead.


I don't see the confusion here (Perhaps I'm confused !)

A wooden shed 10m2 in floor area built next to the boundary would be
exempt from building control due to sub-section 3. If sub-section 3
did not exist it would not be exempt therefore sub-section 3 does have
a reason for being there.

What am I missing ?

Cheers,

John (confused?)