Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Debunking the "more trees" lie once again (was Creationist Limbaugh doesn't unders
"rick etter" wrote in message ... "Fred Elbel" wrote in message ... On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 05:16:33 +0000 (UTC), (Larry Harrell) wrote: "Corporate Interests" want that steady supply of small logs that will result from thinning programs soon to be mandated by Congress. Loggers want to go to work. People want to be safe from fires. The forests need to be healthier, drought resistant and fire resistant. "Management", as opposed to "preservationism" will get our forests resored much quicker than "Mother Nature", as she works on very long cycles without man's intervention. Are you a corporate shill? ===================== No, but you're still an ignorant shrill, schreeching idiot.. Actually, he asked a legitimate question considering the fact Larry Harrel's response included this statement: "Also, If the USFS didn't have to meet all those NEPA guidelines, public opinion, and a multitude of local, regional, state and Federal laws, just like private industry, then maybe we'd make a profit, Fred" Why say "we'd" if he wasn't involved in the industry? There's a chance this guy works in the timber industry. - Norseman |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|