Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old 29-10-2010, 02:05 AM posted to aus.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Feb 2009
Posts: 126
Default OT The Murray-Darling Basin Plan


"FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote in message
...
"SG1" wrote in message
I used to be a constituent of Bob's, he is not universally loved there,
but he is a noisy axle (needs greasing). I admired his stand when the
other 2 supposed rural reps went commo.


LOL. Was poor old Katter silly enough to think they went commo? I didn't
hear that report but I was rather busy during that immediate post election
phase. I knew he was a silly sausage.


The commo bit is my take on the 2 twits. When in a country electorate you
ate least have some country leanings. The Snot (greens) & Labor have none at
all. The snot want to lock all of the country up so we produce nothing.





  #2   Report Post  
Old 29-10-2010, 02:56 AM posted to aus.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Sep 2009
Posts: 135
Default OT The Murray-Darling Basin Plan

SG1 wrote:

The commo bit is my take on the 2 twits. When in a country electorate you
ate least have some country leanings. The Snot (greens) & Labor have none at
all. The snot want to lock all of the country up so we produce nothing.


Whereas a **** like you just keeps preaching watermelon propaganda
without really looking at the policies of parties. Unions are ditiching
Labor and moving support to the greens as they are better for union
members. The greens inherently support small business( = most family
farmer?) If you think their policies need fine tuning for the bush, join
the party. At least they still have a system where their policies are
decided by the party members and not back office party hacks.
  #3   Report Post  
Old 29-10-2010, 05:33 AM posted to aus.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Feb 2009
Posts: 126
Default OT The Murray-Darling Basin Plan


"terryc" wrote in message
...
SG1 wrote:

The commo bit is my take on the 2 twits. When in a country electorate you
ate least have some country leanings. The Snot (greens) & Labor have none
at all. The snot want to lock all of the country up so we produce
nothing.


Whereas a **** like you just keeps preaching watermelon propaganda without
really looking at the policies of parties. Unions are ditiching Labor and
moving support to the greens as they are better for union members. The
greens inherently support small business( = most family farmer?) If you
think their policies need fine tuning for the bush, join the party. At
least they still have a system where their policies are decided by the
party members and not back office party hacks.


Sorry had a go a being a party hack in my youth (long time ago), There is NO
way I would join a party with a turd tickler as it's head.


  #4   Report Post  
Old 29-10-2010, 06:49 AM posted to aus.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,036
Default OT The Murray-Darling Basin Plan

SG1 wrote:
"terryc" wrote in message
...
SG1 wrote:

The commo bit is my take on the 2 twits. When in a country
electorate you ate least have some country leanings. The Snot
(greens) & Labor have none at all. The snot want to lock all of the
country up so we produce nothing.


Whereas a **** like you just keeps preaching watermelon propaganda
without really looking at the policies of parties. Unions are
ditiching Labor and moving support to the greens as they are better
for union members. The greens inherently support small business( =
most family farmer?) If you think their policies need fine tuning
for the bush, join the party. At least they still have a system
where their policies are decided by the party members and not back
office party hacks.


Sorry had a go a being a party hack in my youth (long time ago),
There is NO way I would join a party with a turd tickler as it's head.


A person's sexual preferences or practices are no grounds for evaluating
their political performance or anything else about them unless you have an
interest in how such characteristics might relate directly and personally to
you and your preferences. I cannot think of any forum where gratuitous
sexual slurs about public figures, or anybody, are appropriate.

David

  #5   Report Post  
Old 29-10-2010, 07:39 AM posted to aus.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 65
Default OT The Murray-Darling Basin Plan

David Hare-Scott wrote:
SG1 wrote:
"terryc" wrote in message
...
SG1 wrote:

The commo bit is my take on the 2 twits. When in a country
electorate you ate least have some country leanings. The Snot
(greens) & Labor have none at all. The snot want to lock all of the
country up so we produce nothing.

Whereas a **** like you just keeps preaching watermelon propaganda
without really looking at the policies of parties. Unions are
ditiching Labor and moving support to the greens as they are better
for union members. The greens inherently support small business( =
most family farmer?) If you think their policies need fine tuning
for the bush, join the party. At least they still have a system
where their policies are decided by the party members and not back
office party hacks.


Sorry had a go a being a party hack in my youth (long time ago),
There is NO way I would join a party with a turd tickler as it's head.


A person's sexual preferences or practices are no grounds for evaluating
their political performance or anything else about them unless you have
an interest in how such characteristics might relate directly and
personally to you and your preferences. I cannot think of any forum
where gratuitous sexual slurs about public figures, or anybody, are
appropriate.

David


Well said.

I don't know that any one party will get it right but hopefully this is a start. If everyone concerned worked
together instead of as adversaries, we'd all be better off. Then we could call this country Oztopia

--
Anne Chambers
South Australia

anne dot chambers at bigpond dot com


  #6   Report Post  
Old 31-10-2010, 04:54 AM posted to aus.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,358
Default OT The Murray-Darling Basin Plan

"SG1" wrote in message
"terryc" wrote in message
...
SG1 wrote:

The commo bit is my take on the 2 twits. When in a country electorate
you ate least have some country leanings. The Snot (greens) & Labor have
none at all. The snot want to lock all of the country up so we produce
nothing.


Whereas a **** like you just keeps preaching watermelon propaganda
without really looking at the policies of parties. Unions are ditiching
Labor and moving support to the greens as they are better for union
members. The greens inherently support small business( = most family
farmer?) If you think their policies need fine tuning for the bush, join
the party. At least they still have a system where their policies are
decided by the party members and not back office party hacks.


Sorry had a go a being a party hack in my youth (long time ago), There is
NO way I would join a party with a turd tickler as it's head.


Well that's confirmation of what sort of person you are.


  #7   Report Post  
Old 31-10-2010, 05:10 AM posted to aus.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Feb 2009
Posts: 126
Default OT The Murray-Darling Basin Plan


"FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote in message
u...
"SG1" wrote in message
"terryc" wrote in message
...
SG1 wrote:

The commo bit is my take on the 2 twits. When in a country electorate
you ate least have some country leanings. The Snot (greens) & Labor
have none at all. The snot want to lock all of the country up so we
produce nothing.

Whereas a **** like you just keeps preaching watermelon propaganda
without really looking at the policies of parties. Unions are ditiching
Labor and moving support to the greens as they are better for union
members. The greens inherently support small business( = most family
farmer?) If you think their policies need fine tuning for the bush, join
the party. At least they still have a system where their policies are
decided by the party members and not back office party hacks.


Sorry had a go a being a party hack in my youth (long time ago), There is
NO way I would join a party with a turd tickler as it's head.


Well that's confirmation of what sort of person you are.


Yep you can take it for sure that I say what I think, I just do not like the
greens or their leader.




  #8   Report Post  
Old 31-10-2010, 06:05 AM posted to aus.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Feb 2009
Posts: 126
Default Very OT but polite

Just stole this from Felix the Cat in Aus.computers

"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because
they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor
governments"

"If you think utility prices are high now, watch them go through the roof
with the Green/ALP carbon tax"

The insane Greens! .. http://tinyurl.com/insane-Greens

"The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other
peoples money"

"Those who tolerate intolerance will cease to exist"

"Truth is the new hate speech"

"Political correctness is a polite form of tryanny"





  #9   Report Post  
Old 31-10-2010, 07:04 AM posted to aus.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Nov 2007
Posts: 167
Default Very OT but polite

SG1 wrote:
Just stole this from Felix the Cat in Aus.computers

"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because
they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor
governments"

"If you think utility prices are high now, watch them go through the roof
with the Green/ALP carbon tax"

The insane Greens! .. http://tinyurl.com/insane-Greens

"The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other
peoples money"

"Those who tolerate intolerance will cease to exist"

"Truth is the new hate speech"

"Political correctness is a polite form of tryanny"



Geez, guys! No matter how polite you might think it is, political
wrangling is a drag on aus.gardens! Please take a deep breath and give
it a rest or take it to email!

--
Trish Brown {|:-}

Newcastle, NSW, Australia
  #10   Report Post  
Old 28-10-2010, 05:30 AM posted to aus.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 713
Default OT The Murray-Darling Basin Plan

"terryc" wrote in message
...
SG1 wrote:

The commo bit is my take on the 2 twits. When in a country electorate you
ate least have some country leanings. The Snot (greens) & Labor have none
at all. The snot want to lock all of the country up so we produce
nothing.


no they don't. they are inherently pro-australian farming for reasons of
economic and food security, and in terms of the welfare of farmers
themselves & rural communities in general. (i.e. they do NOT support
petrochemical agri-corporation farming, they do NOT support farmland being
flooded for dams, built up with mcmansions, or allowed to be destroyed by
harmful farming practices.)

furthermore, you'd have noticed a lot of country electorates have labor
members. duh!

terry c
Whereas a **** like you just keeps preaching watermelon propaganda without
really looking at the policies of parties. Unions are ditiching Labor and
moving support to the greens as they are better for union members. The
greens inherently support small business( = most family farmer?)


they support all things country in general (famously forests, but also all
the other stuff). the _perception_ of right-wing people who aren't paying
attention is that they hate the country & country people. this idea is
clearly delusional, however, the greens probably need to work a bit harder
on correcting this misinterpretation - that's just the reality of politics.

If you think their policies need fine tuning for the bush, join
the party. At least they still have a system where their policies are
decided by the party members and not back office party hacks.





  #11   Report Post  
Old 31-10-2010, 04:48 AM posted to aus.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,358
Default OT The Murray-Darling Basin Plan

"SG1" wrote in message
...
"FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote in message
...
"SG1" wrote in message
I used to be a constituent of Bob's, he is not universally loved there,
but he is a noisy axle (needs greasing). I admired his stand when the
other 2 supposed rural reps went commo.


LOL. Was poor old Katter silly enough to think they went commo? I
didn't hear that report but I was rather busy during that immediate post
election phase. I knew he was a silly sausage.


The commo bit is my take


Oh.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT- Open the gates darling shazzbat United Kingdom 1 28-02-2007 09:14 PM
Darling-Sweetie BBC2 Digging Deep Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\) United Kingdom 19 21-10-2006 01:50 PM
"Fossil Plants Of The Ione Basin, California"--My New Web Page Inyo Plant Science 1 18-05-2005 03:03 AM
Wildflowers Images From Mojave-Great Basin Deserts Inyo Gardening 6 28-12-2003 09:32 PM
(LONG) Drought likely for 3rd year in Klamath Basin Daniel B. Wheeler alt.forestry 0 23-02-2003 12:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017