Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dr. Schwarcz replies
"sherwin dubren" wrote in message
In response to all the chatter about Dr. Scharcz being on the payroll of the chemical companies, as well as his office, I sent him the comments from this forum and he replied with the following: Thanks for forwarding me that nonsense. Nobody funds me....except McGill University . I do know where the CBI stuff comes from....a while ago CBI funded some summer scholarships for McGill students, a couple of whom ended up working in our office. That had nothing to do with anything....certainly not with my book. These "organic" people are paranoid and if a view doesn't fit into their "world view" they think that some conspiracy is afoot. They generally have a very poor scientific background and have no understanding of chemistry. They could use a little oil for their mental machinery. Organic oil if they so wish. regards Dr. Joe Schwarcz Steve can take pot shots at Dr. Schwarcz to try and malign his knowledge and connections, but he is only trying to divert people from understanding what this well educated man has to say. He is well recognized in the scientific community and well accepted by the public who buy his books and watch his regular TV show up in Canada. Too bad certain people have closed minds. Some may call that dogmatism but I tend to think it is fanaticism. Several thought occur to me on reading your post. Does Dr Schwarcz know that you were going to post a private email to a public forum so that anyone can read it? If, and I stress the 'if', you are really posting what Dr Schwarcz has written to you, then his response to you is simply extraordinary. Any scientist worth taking note of who responds to an email from a stranger and who using such sloppy thinking to write words like "These "organic" people are paranoid and if a view doesn't fit into their "world view" they think that some conspiracy is afoot. " and that they "could use a little oil for their mental machinery" is of questionable sense. If he is a serious scientist, he would have been more temperate in his language because he'd be used to the process of peer reviews and know that he'd have to justify everything he says. I doubt that you emailed him at all or that he responded. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Can't answer replies! | Orchids | |||
Dr Avery replies :-( | United Kingdom | |||
Why won't my replies post? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Why won't my replies post? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
thanks for replies | United Kingdom |