Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David

On 1/23/2010 3:14 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David


The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been caught with its
pants down again, this time with bogus claims about the Himalayan
glaciers. R. K. Pachauri has admitted the claims were false, but
somehow this "only strengthened the credibility" of the IPCC.

Best regards,
Bob

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:01:07 -0600, zxcvbob wrote:
On 1/23/2010 3:14 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David


The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been caught with its
pants down again, this time with bogus claims about the Himalayan
glaciers. R. K. Pachauri has admitted the claims were false, but
somehow this "only strengthened the credibility" of the IPCC.

You can find bullshit in any science. However, it is irrelevent
as it'll be discredited. This is really basic stuff.

In article ,
zxcvbob wrote:

On 1/23/2010 3:14 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David


The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been caught with its
pants down again, this time with bogus claims about the Himalayan
glaciers. R. K. Pachauri has admitted the claims were false, but
somehow this "only strengthened the credibility" of the IPCC.

Best regards,
Bob

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/sc...Envirobrf.html

Regret on Himalayan Glaciers Estimate

By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
Published: January 20, 2010
An international scientific panel overseen by the United Nations
expressed "regret" on Wednesday for publishing an unsupported estimate
of the speed at which Himalayan glaciers were melting. The estimate,
included in a landmark 2007 report by the group, the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, said that the glaciers in the Himalayas could
disappear by 2035. The figure was culled from a dated magazine interview
with an Indian glacier scientist who now denies that he used that
number. Although there is abundant evidence that glaciers are
retreating, scientists differ on the speed of that trend and which
glaciers will be affected.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100119/...ting_activists
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/19/headlines

In article ,
zxcvbob wrote:

On 1/23/2010 3:14 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David


The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been caught with its
pants down again, this time with bogus claims about the Himalayan
glaciers. R. K. Pachauri has admitted the claims were false, but
somehow this "only strengthened the credibility" of the IPCC.

Best regards,
Bob

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...layan-glaciers
-mistake
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100119/...ting_activists
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/19/headlines

"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David

What evidence?

In article ,
"aluckyguess" wrote:

"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David

What evidence?

You're just playing dumb, right?
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100119/...ting_activists
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/19/headlines

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:41:37 -0800, Wildbilly wrote:
In article ,
"aluckyguess" wrote:

"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David

What evidence?

You're just playing dumb, right?

No. Religions have no evidence whatsoever. Most are circular:
bible says god exists; bible is word of god; god said so, etc.
That isn't evidence. Lots of people believing something isn't
evidence. Feelings of someting aren't evidence.

aluckyguess wrote:
"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David

What evidence?

You are not serious (unless you are claiming to be a home-schooled 14 year
old) so this doesn't warrant a reply.

David

On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:49:20 +1100, David Hare-Scott wrote:
aluckyguess wrote:
"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David

What evidence?

You are not serious (unless you are claiming to be a home-schooled 14 year
old) so this doesn't warrant a reply.

David

Because you have no evidence.

AZ Nomad wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:49:20 +1100, David Hare-Scott
wrote:
aluckyguess wrote:
"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David

What evidence?

You are not serious (unless you are claiming to be a home-schooled
14 year old) so this doesn't warrant a reply.

David

Because you have no evidence.

Not at all but I am not going to start in with a 500 pages book. My reply
was about the method of forming your views and understanding not about the
evidence itself. The Buddha/Gore joke suggests that the matter is
religious - I was saying that it shouldn't be.

David

On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:42:26 +1100, David Hare-Scott wrote:
AZ Nomad wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:49:20 +1100, David Hare-Scott
wrote:
aluckyguess wrote:
"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David

What evidence?

You are not serious (unless you are claiming to be a home-schooled
14 year old) so this doesn't warrant a reply.

David

Because you have no evidence.

Not at all but I am not going to start in with a 500 pages book. My reply
was about the method of forming your views and understanding not about the
evidence itself. The Buddha/Gore joke suggests that the matter is
religious - I was saying that it shouldn't be.

David

In other words, you have no evidence.

In article ,
AZ Nomad wrote:

On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:42:26 +1100, David Hare-Scott
wrote:
AZ Nomad wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:49:20 +1100, David Hare-Scott
wrote:
aluckyguess wrote:
"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David

What evidence?

You are not serious (unless you are claiming to be a home-schooled
14 year old) so this doesn't warrant a reply.

David

Because you have no evidence.

Not at all but I am not going to start in with a 500 pages book. My reply
was about the method of forming your views and understanding not about the
evidence itself. The Buddha/Gore joke suggests that the matter is
religious - I was saying that it shouldn't be.

David

In other words, you have no evidence.

By your standards, neither do you. The facts are in dispute, however the
preponderance of scientist agree that it appears that the planet is
warming (at least in part) because of our use of fossil fuels, and the
large herds of cattle being raised for human consumption(methane).
Whatever the cause, more methane is being released as the arctic tundra
warms up, which will only accelerate global warming. If the oceans warm
a bit more, frozen methane anhydride will be released, and global
warming will accelerate again.

OK, this is speculation from some of the world's best minds. They could
be wrong, but, then again, they could be right. It seems that the wise
man, given a choice of looking foolish or dead, would pick foolish. Or
do you suggest that we hunker down like ol' Harry Truman did when
ordered to evacuate the region around Mt. St. Helens?

Why do you wish to put humanity in harm's way, without proof?
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100119/...ting_activists
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/19/headlines

AZ Nomad wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:42:26 +1100, David Hare-Scott
wrote:
AZ Nomad wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:49:20 +1100, David Hare-Scott
wrote:
aluckyguess wrote:
"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure
that matters - it is the evidence.

David

What evidence?

You are not serious (unless you are claiming to be a home-schooled
14 year old) so this doesn't warrant a reply.

David

Because you have no evidence.

Not at all but I am not going to start in with a 500 pages book. My
reply was about the method of forming your views and understanding
not about the evidence itself. The Buddha/Gore joke suggests that
the matter is religious - I was saying that it shouldn't be.

David

In other words, you have no evidence.

Too thick to understand too proud to give up.

David

This is way off topic and is getting boring. Let's just drop it!

Glenn Lynn

On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:42:26 +1100, "David Hare-Scott"
wrote:

AZ Nomad wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:49:20 +1100, David Hare-Scott
wrote:
aluckyguess wrote:
"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Frank wrote:
http://atroshenko.com/NSAlBuddha.html

You don't get it. It is not your God or your authority figure that
matters - it is the evidence.

David

What evidence?

You are not serious (unless you are claiming to be a home-schooled
14 year old) so this doesn't warrant a reply.

David

Because you have no evidence.

Not at all but I am not going to start in with a 500 pages book. My reply
was about the method of forming your views and understanding not about the
evidence itself. The Buddha/Gore joke suggests that the matter is
religious - I was saying that it shouldn't be.

David