|
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
On Feb 1, 8:56*am, nick hull wrote:
In article , *"Bob" wrote: election or vote third party. I know know who will win the Democratic nomination, but whomever it turns out to be will surely be our next president. Personally, I couldn't agree more - As a Republican who first voted for Ike in 1956, I will not vote for McCain. *Won't vote Libertarian because of their stance on Iraq. *Will probably skip voting for a prez for the first time in my life. Bob-tx I really hate to say this, but a Democrat (even Hillary!) might be better than McCain for the 2nd amendment. *The NRA will fight a democratic president tooth and nail, but would compromise our rights away with a republican ;( Now that is laughable. When did you ever see the NRA compromise with anyone? They have their own paid special interest group that pays their salaries and sends money in buckets. There is no reason they would cave in to McCain or anyone else who happens to be president. Free men own guns - www(dot)geocities(dot)com/CapitolHill/5357/ |
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
On Jan 31, 3:44Â*pm, " wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:11�pm, MajorOz wrote: On Jan 31, 9:03 am, Comics Momma WebTV wrote: He McCain is a lefty pinko. Did not fight in viet nam, helped and assisted the viet cong by turning himself in and being a prisoner. Real patriot would not have surrendered. � Pinkos surrender. � My son comic would not have surrendered, he would hide under his bed like during this war. ...realizing I may be feeding a troll....... John McCain is one of the bravest, giving, and honorable men ever to have served his country. �He is deserving of the highest levels of respect. People of good intent my not want him to be president, based on political views, but that does not detract from his lifetime of dedication to his heritage and nation. cheers oz, who has, for the first time since voting age, no candidate. �If only I could cut and paste from those running. he was a hero, but whats left is a shell of what WAS a great american. he is a war monger, wants to remain in iraq for 20 years or more as a occupying force. By that standard, every president since WWII has been a war monger. We still have troups in Japan, Germany, South Korea, and half a dozen other places, don't we? Have the results of that been bad? Any candidates advocating withdrawing them from there? One of the big complaints from liberals was that the US abandoned Afghanistan after the Soviets withdrew. Yet, when we propose to remain, that's supposed to be war mongering. 20-20 hindsight is real convenient. the US needs a new start, that leaves obama.........- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:24:20 -0500, Shawn Hirn
wrote: In article , Doobie Keebler wrote: There are no good choices on the GOP ticket: get ready for Hillary/ Obama I agree. McCain will get the Republican nomination, but he ****es off a lot of conservatives, and he won't be able to rely on the religious wing-nut base, which means a lot of Republicans will either sit out this election or vote third party. Interesting addition to that discussion: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpu...er-i-will.html Coulter: I Will Vote for Hillary Over McCain February 01, 2008 10:38 AM In case you missed it, on Hannity & Colmes last night, controversial pundit Ann Coulter -- who supports Mitt Romney for president -- said she would back Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, over Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. "She's more conservative that he is," she said. "She will be stronger on the war on terrorism...I will campaign for her if it's McCain."... OTOH, with friends like that, who needs enemies? |
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article , Doobie Keebler wrote: On Jan 31, 2:44 pm, " wrote: John McCain .. wants to remain in iraq for 20 years... This is why McCain is not electable: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf7HYoh9YMM&NR=1 "100 Years In Iraq" is not a good campaign slogan for 2008. Nobody wants their grandkids to still be fighting this war. Rudy's toast, Huckabee is a religious nut, Mitt is a douchebag, so that leaves St. John of McCain and his Holy War. There are no good choices on the GOP ticket: get ready for Hillary/ Obama I agree. McCain will get the Republican nomination, but he ****es off a lot of conservatives, and he won't be able to rely on the religious wing-nut base, which means a lot of Republicans will either sit out this election or vote third party. I know know who will win the Democratic nomination, but whomever it turns out to be will surely be our next president. Don't know, there are more people in the middle than you think. The best thing that happened to McCain is having Limbaugh declare that it will be the death of the Republican party. There are many people who sit a little right of center who don't care for the full bore anything is OK as long as a couple greedy reach guys profit from it system who find McCain attractive. And of the thinking voters I know (not the I only drink red or blue Koolaid people) they have said they would never consider voting for Hillary if she should get the nomination. |
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Don Homuth wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:24:20 -0500, Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Doobie Keebler wrote: There are no good choices on the GOP ticket: get ready for Hillary/ Obama I agree. McCain will get the Republican nomination, but he ****es off a lot of conservatives, and he won't be able to rely on the religious wing-nut base, which means a lot of Republicans will either sit out this election or vote third party. Interesting addition to that discussion: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpu...er-i-will.html Coulter: I Will Vote for Hillary Over McCain February 01, 2008 10:38 AM In case you missed it, on Hannity & Colmes last night, controversial pundit Ann Coulter -- who supports Mitt Romney for president -- said she would back Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, over Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. "She's more conservative that he is," she said. "She will be stronger on the war on terrorism...I will campaign for her if it's McCain."... OTOH, with friends like that, who needs enemies? The right wing extremists are just piling on after Limbaugh declared that the Republican party would be dead with McCain. I think there are a lot more people in the middle than there are red or blue Koolaid drinkers and I think making that declaration is a good thing. |
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Bob wrote:
Personally, I couldn't agree more - As a Republican who first voted for Ike in 1956, I will not vote for McCain. Won't vote Libertarian because of their stance on Iraq. Will probably skip voting for a prez for the first time in my life. Bob-tx Four reasons to vote for McCain if he's the nominee: John Paul Stevens Anthony M. Kennedy Ruth Bader Ginsburg Steven G. Breyer |
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
In article ,
George wrote: Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Doobie Keebler wrote: On Jan 31, 2:44 pm, " wrote: John McCain .. wants to remain in iraq for 20 years... This is why McCain is not electable: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf7HYoh9YMM&NR=1 "100 Years In Iraq" is not a good campaign slogan for 2008. Nobody wants their grandkids to still be fighting this war. Rudy's toast, Huckabee is a religious nut, Mitt is a douchebag, so that leaves St. John of McCain and his Holy War. There are no good choices on the GOP ticket: get ready for Hillary/ Obama I agree. McCain will get the Republican nomination, but he ****es off a lot of conservatives, and he won't be able to rely on the religious wing-nut base, which means a lot of Republicans will either sit out this election or vote third party. I know know who will win the Democratic nomination, but whomever it turns out to be will surely be our next president. Don't know, there are more people in the middle than you think. The best thing that happened to McCain is having Limbaugh declare that it will be the death of the Republican party. There are many people who sit a little right of center who don't care for the full bore anything is OK as long as a couple greedy reach guys profit from it system who find McCain attractive. And of the thinking voters I know (not the I only drink red or blue Koolaid people) they have said they would never consider voting for Hillary if she should get the nomination. So, if Obama gets nominated, you just know that some folks are gonna' go bullet shopping. Best thing for Obama would be to have Hillary for his running mate. Yes sir, that would give them big-ots somethin' to ruminate about. Hell, it worked for George Bush. Why do you think he is still alive? Big Dick Cheney, that's why. Hmmm, hmmm, hmmm, just a nasty thought to think about. Yo. Go 'Bama. Make their eyes bug-out:-) -- Billy Bush, Cheney & Pelosi, Behind Bars http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Sto...917874,00.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movemen...George_W._Bush |
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
mc cain a war monger who wants to keep a occupying force in iraq for a
100 years, isnt electable unless terrorists attack before the next election. oddly enough if he gets elected and occupies forever, that will almost guarantee more terrorist attacks here |
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
|
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
nick hull wrote:
In article , "Bob" wrote: election or vote third party. I know know who will win the Democratic nomination, but whomever it turns out to be will surely be our next president. Personally, I couldn't agree more - As a Republican who first voted for Ike in 1956, I will not vote for McCain. Won't vote Libertarian because of their stance on Iraq. Will probably skip voting for a prez for the first time in my life. Bob-tx I really hate to say this, but a Democrat (even Hillary!) might be better than McCain for the 2nd amendment. The NRA will fight a democratic president tooth and nail, but would compromise our rights away with a republican ;( Even if Hillary 'Lady Macbeth' Clinton WAS qualified, I wouldn't vote for her. 2 families have held the White House for 20 years- time for somebody else. It isn't supposed to be an inherited office, by blood or marriage. (BTW- I have NO trouble with a woman for POTUS- just not THAT woman.) aem sends... |
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
HeyBub wrote:
CJT wrote: ... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. If you're not with us, you're on the side of the terrorists. On a more practical level, the GOP is in nomination disarray. I predict that JEB Bush will be the nominee! After eight years with JEB (leading us to security, hegemony, and prosperity), it'll be time for that good-looking Bush Hispanic nephew. By the end of his two terms, the dynasty will be well established. After that, it's only a small step to a monarchy, which is what we Republicans are really working for. Don't tell anybody! The word is already out. Ain't gonna happen. -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form . |
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
George wrote:
Don Homuth wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:24:20 -0500, Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Doobie Keebler wrote: There are no good choices on the GOP ticket: get ready for Hillary/ Obama I agree. McCain will get the Republican nomination, but he ****es off a lot of conservatives, and he won't be able to rely on the religious wing-nut base, which means a lot of Republicans will either sit out this election or vote third party. Interesting addition to that discussion: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpu...er-i-will.html Coulter: I Will Vote for Hillary Over McCain February 01, 2008 10:38 AM In case you missed it, on Hannity & Colmes last night, controversial pundit Ann Coulter -- who supports Mitt Romney for president -- said she would back Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, over Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. "She's more conservative that he is," she said. "She will be stronger on the war on terrorism...I will campaign for her if it's McCain."... OTOH, with friends like that, who needs enemies? The right wing extremists are just piling on after Limbaugh declared that the Republican party would be dead with McCain. I think there are a lot more people in the middle than there are red or blue Koolaid drinkers and I think making that declaration is a good thing. How long until Limbaugh endorses Clinton? -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form . |
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Rod Speed wrote:
wrote mc cain a war monger who wants to keep a occupying force in iraq for a 100 years, Its getting on for 60 years now with Germany, Japan, etc. isnt electable unless terrorists attack before the next election. Depends entirely on what unelectable fool the Democrats are stupid enough to have. oddly enough if he gets elected and occupies forever, that will almost guarantee more terrorist attacks here How odd that there havent been any since 9/11. They don't need to attack when Bush is doing their work _for_ them. -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form . |
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:24:20 -0500, Shawn Hirn
wrote: I agree. McCain will get the Republican nomination, but he ****es off a lot of conservatives, and he won't be able to rely on the religious wing-nut base, which means a lot of Republicans will either sit out this election or vote third party. I know know who will win the Democratic nomination, but whomever it turns out to be will surely be our next president. After seven years of the Bush, Jesus Christ himself couldn't win on the republican line. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter