Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Nate Nagel wrote:
I'm one of those right-of-center people who is disgusted by the actions of the right wing. I won't vote for McCain simply because he impressed me with his "agents of intolerance" rhetoric in the last round of primaries but this past year he has been cozying up to the religious right in a blatant attempt to get more votes. I think he's really still the old "agents of intolerance" guy inside but I have a hard time voting for someone with no convictions and/or without the spine to stand up and say what he really thinks. So you want another Bush? Me too. Ah, but all your concerns pale into insignificance compared to security. Look what recent presidents have done when faced with aggression: When the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, Carter(D) cancelled the Olympics. When Muslims did some nasties, Clinton(D) bombed an aspirin factory. When Iraq invaded Kuwait, Bush 1(R) bombed 'em back to the stone age. When Iraq just sat there, doing nothing, Bush 2(R), invaded, secured their leader, killed his children, evicted him from his home, exiled his family, confiscated his funds, and, eventually, had him hanged. Now, which of the candidates still in the hunt do we believe is more blood-thirsty? Who do we think can hate more intensely? Who is it that is not disgusted by seeing body parts of our enemies strewn to the four corners? Who would have the no regrets over the families of terrorists destined to wander the plains, leaving bloody footprints in the snow, while the lamentations of the widows and the cries of the children mix with the foul north winds? Well, aside from me, there's probably only one of the four national candidates. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
HeyBub wrote:
Nate Nagel wrote: I'm one of those right-of-center people who is disgusted by the actions of the right wing. I won't vote for McCain simply because he impressed me with his "agents of intolerance" rhetoric in the last round of primaries but this past year he has been cozying up to the religious right in a blatant attempt to get more votes. I think he's really still the old "agents of intolerance" guy inside but I have a hard time voting for someone with no convictions and/or without the spine to stand up and say what he really thinks. So you want another Bush? Me too. Ah, but all your concerns pale into insignificance compared to security. Look what recent presidents have done when faced with aggression: When the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, Carter(D) cancelled the Olympics. When Muslims did some nasties, Clinton(D) bombed an aspirin factory. When Iraq invaded Kuwait, Bush 1(R) bombed 'em back to the stone age. When Iraq just sat there, doing nothing, Bush 2(R), invaded, secured their leader, killed his children, evicted him from his home, exiled his family, confiscated his funds, and, eventually, had him hanged. Now, which of the candidates still in the hunt do we believe is more blood-thirsty? Who do we think can hate more intensely? Who is it that is not disgusted by seeing body parts of our enemies strewn to the four corners? Who would have the no regrets over the families of terrorists destined to wander the plains, leaving bloody footprints in the snow, while the lamentations of the widows and the cries of the children mix with the foul north winds? Kinda makes you wonder how they call themselves Christians. Well, aside from me, there's probably only one of the four national candidates. -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form . |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
CJT wrote:
Now, which of the candidates still in the hunt do we believe is more blood-thirsty? Who do we think can hate more intensely? Who is it that is not disgusted by seeing body parts of our enemies strewn to the four corners? Who would have the no regrets over the families of terrorists destined to wander the plains, leaving bloody footprints in the snow, while the lamentations of the widows and the cries of the children mix with the foul north winds? Kinda makes you wonder how they call themselves Christians. Shame on you! We are a pluralistic nation with no religious qualifying test for our government employees. Check your beliefs at the door of the Warrior Wing. Hillary said the military requires a "suspension of disbelief." That's not true. We want, if necessary, a suspension of BELIEF (plus someone who enjoys a job well done as he disembowels the enemy). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
In article ,
"HeyBub" wrote: CJT wrote: Now, which of the candidates still in the hunt do we believe is more blood-thirsty? Who do we think can hate more intensely? Who is it that is not disgusted by seeing body parts of our enemies strewn to the four corners? Who would have the no regrets over the families of terrorists destined to wander the plains, leaving bloody footprints in the snow, while the lamentations of the widows and the cries of the children mix with the foul north winds? Kinda makes you wonder how they call themselves Christians. Shame on you! We are a pluralistic nation with no religious qualifying test for our government employees. Check your beliefs at the door of the Warrior Wing. Hillary said the military requires a "suspension of disbelief." That's not true. We want, if necessary, a suspension of BELIEF (plus someone who enjoys a job well done as he disembowels the enemy). And how Mr. Blood-n-Guts do we identify the enemy? Is it those identified by an election stealing, draft dodging, mentally inferior Commander in Chief or, do you just make it up as you go along? My point is that the tax payers who pay for your "services" want PEACE so we can raise our kids, keep our jobs, and watch Super Bowl on 40" flat screens. Your life style makes it hard to go get the beer. -- Billy Bush, Cheney & Pelosi, Behind Bars http://rachelcorriefoundation.org/site/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movemen...George_W._Bush |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Billy wrote
HeyBub wrote CJT wrote Now, which of the candidates still in the hunt do we believe is more blood-thirsty? Who do we think can hate more intensely? Who is it that is not disgusted by seeing body parts of our enemies strewn to the four corners? Who would have the no regrets over the families of terrorists destined to wander the plains, leaving bloody footprints in the snow, while the lamentations of the widows and the cries of the children mix with the foul north winds? Kinda makes you wonder how they call themselves Christians. Shame on you! We are a pluralistic nation with no religious qualifying test for our government employees. Check your beliefs at the door of the Warrior Wing. Hillary said the military requires a "suspension of disbelief." That's not true. We want, if necessary, a suspension of BELIEF (plus someone who enjoys a job well done as he disembowels the enemy). And how Mr. Blood-n-Guts do we identify the enemy? Is it those identified by an election stealing, draft dodging, mentally inferior Commander in Chief or, do you just make it up as you go along? My point is that the tax payers who pay for your "services" want PEACE so we can raise our kids, keep our jobs, and watch Super Bowl on 40" flat screens. They also wanted some action in response to 9/11 and without those prepared to do that sort of thing, the US wouldnt have been able to do anything about Afghanistan etc. Your life style makes it hard to go get the beer. And your mentality makes it hard to ensure that 9/11 wont be repeated. You wont care about the beer if some terrorists manage to let off a dirty nuke in the US, stupid. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
On Feb 4, 3:03*pm, "Rod Speed" wrote:
They also wanted some action in response to 9/11 and without those prepared to do that sort of thing, the US wouldnt have been able to do anything about Afghanistan etc. the etc. being Iraq? really good response to 9/11 that was. sure has solved the problem. hey, how's Bush's plan of "smokin' 'im out" ('im being bin Laden) going? haven't heard much about it lately. Well, we showed the world. You mess with us, and we will attack somebody who sort of reminds us of you (since we're not too good with races and languages and that foreign stuff), who we also don't like. It's like that scene in over the top crime movies, where the head bad guy tries to threaten the hero, by shooting one of his own men "You see what I'm capable of? I wasn't even mad at him, imagine what I will do to you". |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
z wrote:
Rod Speed wrote Billy wrote My point is that the tax payers who pay for your "services" want PEACE so we can raise our kids, keep our jobs, and watch Super Bowl on 40" flat screens. They also wanted some action in response to 9/11 and without those prepared to do that sort of thing, the US wouldnt have been able to do anything about Afghanistan etc. the etc. being Iraq? Nope, Pakistan etc. really good response to 9/11 that was. sure has solved the problem. Yep, terminal stupidity. hey, how's Bush's plan of "smokin' 'im out" ('im being bin Laden) going? haven't heard much about it lately. Hardly surprising. Big hard to find someone who choses to hide in a cave in the wilds of Pakistan etc. Well, we showed the world. You mess with us, and we will attack somebody who sort of reminds us of you (since we're not too good with races and languages and that foreign stuff), who we also don't like. Or even the stupidest yanks can work out where the terrorist training camps are in places like Afghanistan and **** them over very comprehensively indeed. It's like that scene in over the top crime movies, where the head bad guy tries to threaten the hero, by shooting one of his own men "You see what I'm capable of? I wasn't even mad at him, imagine what I will do to you". Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Billy wrote:
My point is that the tax payers who pay for your "services" want PEACE so we can raise our kids, keep our jobs, and watch Super Bowl on 40" flat screens. Your life style makes it hard to go get the beer. Every dictator on Earth wants 'Peace'. They love the concept of peace. They do anything to their subjects that is needed to be done in order to keep peace. Americans want what this country was founded on: FREEDOM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Dave Bugg wrote: Americans want what this country was founded on: FREEDOM. No, we don't. Even most Ron Paul supporters are satisfied by that illuson of freedom known as material comfort false security. If most Americans really wanted freedom, the Patriot Act never would have become law. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
On Feb 4, 3:05*pm, "Dave Bugg" wrote:
Americans want what this country was founded on: FREEDOM. this country was founded on the freedom of religious nuts to oppress people of very slightly different religions, which they couldn't do at home. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
z wrote
Dave Bugg wrote Americans want what this country was founded on: FREEDOM. this country was founded on the freedom of religious nuts to oppress people of very slightly different religions, which they couldn't do at home. Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never ever had a ****ing clue about anything at all, ever. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
In article
, Billy wrote: And how Mr. Blood-n-Guts do we identify the enemy? Is it those identified by an election stealing, draft dodging, mentally inferior Commander in Chief or, do you just make it up as you go along? From the above list, the making it up as you go along seems to be working pretty well for you... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article , Billy wrote: And how Mr. Blood-n-Guts do we identify the enemy? Is it those identified by an election stealing, draft dodging, mentally inferior Commander in Chief or, do you just make it up as you go along? From the above list, the making it up as you go along seems to be working pretty well for you... LOL!!! Another case of Bush Derangement Syndrome. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
In article ,
"HeyBub" wrote: CJT wrote: Now, which of the candidates still in the hunt do we believe is more blood-thirsty? Who do we think can hate more intensely? Who is it that is not disgusted by seeing body parts of our enemies strewn to the four corners? Who would have the no regrets over the families of terrorists destined to wander the plains, leaving bloody footprints in the snow, while the lamentations of the widows and the cries of the children mix with the foul north winds? Kinda makes you wonder how they call themselves Christians. Shame on you! We are a pluralistic nation with no religious qualifying test for our government employees. Check your beliefs at the door of the Warrior Wing. Hillary said the military requires a "suspension of disbelief." That's not true. We want, if necessary, a suspension of BELIEF (plus someone who enjoys a job well done as he disembowels the enemy). Really? How many non-Christians have served as president? How many atheists are serving in congress or have ever served as president? Where elections are concerned, we Americans are very prejudiced toward Christians? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|