Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
12/1/10 8:40 PM:

....
There's only one thing to say... O J Simpson.

He killed his wife but was not actually guilty, not in a legal
context.

He was, by all appearances, actually guilty... just not found so in
a court of law.

He was, by all appearances, actually guilty... just not found so in a court
of law.

Remember, Steve, in 2003 (!) when your toddler tantrum began, the the
context was described as being *discussing the law* ... not adjudication as
you keep jumping to with the concept of "a legal context". You have not
been able to figure that out in all this time.

Which is pathetic. You really should know how pathetic by now.

... you said :

What I said... and you snipped it. Then brought up a completely different
quote from, I kid you not, 2003... the year you cannot leave. Of course,
that has been beaten to death already...

http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/bush/
-----
Disclaimer: The above is not based on a mathematical proof (or the like)
and is thus "merely" an opinion with the logical possibility of error.
While this is true of darn near all you read, one dimwitted dunderhead
could not figure it out on his own and begged for a disclaimer.
I bet he is still not happy.
-----

And, clearly, you are not. Which frankly makes me smile. Yup, you are the
same "dimwitted dunderhead" you have been since 2003... but your breakdowns
are now more extreme.

Oh, and I see below where after you snipped my reference to your toddler
tantrum you then accused me of sharing your little problem.

LOL! You are so amazingly pathetic, Steve. Really.

"Perhaps not, but we are all expressing our opinions here. And I am showing I
am supported by hundreds of lawyers. Where is your support? For now, unless
someone can show me a good reason, I will accept logic and the words of over
300 lawyers over yours, especially since yours seems based on partisan
support. I am sure you understand."

Yes, I remember when you used to realize what you were stating was merely an
"opinion". I then watched you spend years forgetting that it was merely an
opinion as you kept stating Bush's guilt as a fact. That the case had been
sent to court multiple times and thrown out didn't seem to deter your
trolling. You even asked: "Where is your support?" - as if the case hadn' t
*already* been tossed out on grounds you couldn't comprehend... despite
numerous people trying to explain them to you. Personally, I think you were
too stoned back then... I like you much better now where you just mix alcohol
with the pills and you lay off the crack to a greater extent

(snip the rest of Snit's toddler tantrum)

LOL!



--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

On Dec 1, 8:47*pm, Snit wrote:

What I said...

"...we are all expressing our opinions here"

Yeah... as I said, I saw it... and I knew you were just opining prior
to your admission. What about it?

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:47 pm, Snit wrote:

What I said...

"...we are all expressing our opinions here"

Yeah... as I said, I saw it... and I knew you were just opining prior
to your admission. What about it?

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
12/1/10 8:57 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:47 pm, Snit wrote:

What I said... and you snipped it. Then brought up a completely different
quote from, I kid you not, 2003... the year you cannot leave. Of course,
that has been beaten to death already...

http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/bush/
-----
Disclaimer: The above is not based on a mathematical proof (or the like)
and is thus "merely" an opinion with the logical possibility of error.
While this is true of darn near all you read, one dimwitted dunderhead
could not figure it out on his own and begged for a disclaimer.
I bet he is still not happy.
-----

And, clearly, you are not. Which frankly makes me smile. Yup, you are the
same "dimwitted dunderhead" you have been since 2003... but your breakdowns
are now more extreme.

Oh, and I see below where after you snipped my reference to your toddler
tantrum you then accused me of sharing your little problem.

LOL! You are so amazingly pathetic, Steve. Really.


"...we are all expressing our opinions here"

Right: and my opinions are based on support, reasoning and logic... and
yours rarely are. As evidence, you are now focusing on our comments being
opinions as if that someone excuses your repeated confusion over the
concepts of absolute proof and proof beyond a reasonable doubt... or somehow
weakens the support I have offered, which you cannot counter, to support my
opinion.

How many other side trips will you offer to run from your humiliation? How
many more times will you snip comments you cannot deal with? How many times
will you run like a scared bunny? How many more socks will you use in the
midst of this tantrum of yours?

Seriously, Steve, you are beyond pathetic. At least this time you are not
so far gone you are accusing me of impersonating someone *you* claimed I
was. Yeah, I think that was about as bad as you ever got... esp. when you
connect it with your obsessively tracking me down, threatening to contact my
boss and share your lies with him, etc.

Anyway... time to stop giving you so much attention. Maybe. Always
interesting to see how angry you get when I tell you I might just walk away
from your bullying and lying. It so clearly ****es you off.

Yeah... as I said, I saw it... and I knew you were just opining prior
to your admission. What about it?

My "admission"! LOL! Is there anyone else other than you so stupid they
could not figure out that my well supported comments lead me to have, gasp!,
an opinion... and that you could not offer a counter argument... just a
never ending tantrum. Yeah, your tantrum started in 2003... if you had been
a toddler then you would be a pre-teen now... still having the *same*
tantrum... ****ed off that you cannot refute an argument you disagree with.

That is just amazing.

LOL!

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

On Dec 1, 9:05*pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
12/1/10 8:57 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:47 pm, Snit wrote:

What I said... and you snipped it. *Then brought up a completely different
quote from, I kid you not, 2003... the year you cannot leave. *Of course,
that has been beaten to death already...

http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/bush/
* * -----
* * Disclaimer: The above is not based on a mathematical proof (or the like)
* * and is thus "merely" an opinion with the logical possibility of error.
* * While this is true of darn near all you read, one dimwitted dunderhead
* * could not figure it out on his own and begged for a disclaimer.

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 1, 9:05 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 12/1/10 8:57 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:47 pm, Snit wrote:

What I said... and you snipped it. Then brought up a completely
different quote from, I kid you not, 2003... the year you cannot
leave. Of course, that has been beaten to death already...

http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/bush/
-----
Disclaimer: The above is not based on a mathematical proof (or
the like) and is thus "merely" an opinion with the logical
possibility of error. While this is true of darn near all you
read, one dimwitted dunderhead could not figure it out on his own
and begged for a disclaimer.
I bet he is still not happy.
-----

And, clearly, you are not. Which frankly makes me smile. Yup, you
are the same "dimwitted dunderhead" you have been since 2003...
but your breakdowns are now more extreme.

Oh, and I see below where after you snipped my reference to your
toddler tantrum you then accused me of sharing your little
problem.

LOL! You are so amazingly pathetic, Steve. Really.

"...we are all expressing our opinions here"

Right:

Today, you say: "Right" that it's merely an opinion... tomorrow you
claim it as a fact again 9if not later tonight).

and my opinions are based on support

Correction: They are based on what *you* see as support.

(snip crap)

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Big Crotch on a Small Fish wrote:
Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 1, 9:05 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 12/1/10 8:57 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:47 pm, Snit wrote:

What I said... and you snipped it. Then brought up a completely
different quote from, I kid you not, 2003... the year you cannot
leave. Of course, that has been beaten to death already...

http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/bush/
-----
Disclaimer: The above is not based on a mathematical proof (or
the like) and is thus "merely" an opinion with the logical
possibility of error. While this is true of darn near all you
read, one dimwitted dunderhead could not figure it out on his own
and begged for a disclaimer.
I bet he is still not happy.
-----

And, clearly, you are not. Which frankly makes me smile. Yup, you
are the same "dimwitted dunderhead" you have been since 2003...
but your breakdowns are now more extreme.

Oh, and I see below where after you snipped my reference to your
toddler tantrum you then accused me of sharing your little
problem.

LOL! You are so amazingly pathetic, Steve. Really.

"...we are all expressing our opinions here"

Right:

Today, you say: "Right" that it's merely an opinion... tomorrow you
claim it as a fact again 9if not later tonight).

and my opinions are based on support

Correction: They are based on what *you* see as support.

(snip crap)

LOL!

(crickets chirping)

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 1, 9:05 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 12/1/10 8:57 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:47 pm, Snit wrote:

What I said... and you snipped it. Then brought up a completely
different quote from, I kid you not, 2003... the year you cannot
leave. Of course, that has been beaten to death already...

http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/bush/
-----
Disclaimer: The above is not based on a mathematical proof (or
the like) and is thus "merely" an opinion with the logical
possibility of error. While this is true of darn near all you
read, one dimwitted dunderhead could not figure it out on his own
and begged for a disclaimer.
I bet he is still not happy.
-----

And, clearly, you are not. Which frankly makes me smile. Yup, you
are the same "dimwitted dunderhead" you have been since 2003...
but your breakdowns are now more extreme.

Oh, and I see below where after you snipped my reference to your
toddler tantrum you then accused me of sharing your little
problem.

LOL! You are so amazingly pathetic, Steve. Really.

"...we are all expressing our opinions here"

Right:

Today, you say: "Right" that it's merely an opinion... tomorrow you
claim it as a fact again 9if not later tonight).

and my opinions are based on support

Correction: They are based on what *you* see as support.

(snip crap)

(crickets chirping)


--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Big Crotch on a Small Fish wrote:
Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:47 pm, Snit wrote:

What I said...

"...we are all expressing our opinions here"

Yeah... as I said, I saw it... and I knew you were just opining prior
to your admission. What about it?

LOL!

(crickets chirping)


--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:47 pm, Snit wrote:

What I said...

"...we are all expressing our opinions here"

Yeah... as I said, I saw it... and I knew you were just opining prior
to your admission. What about it?

(crickets chirping)


--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch