Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"dave weil" wrote in message ... On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:40:44 +0000 (UTC), "Martin" wrote: That must be good advice then if you have five books in agreement with our own article on pruning! Perhaps that say's something in itself? Yes, it says that, while it's OK to offer that *widely* available information on *your* web site (only one of dozens of websites that give the same information I might add), next time, please read the post before you promote your site instead of relying on a simple keyword to trigger some sort of quasiautoresponsebot sort of response. It will do your cause well, instead of causing people to ignore possible HELPFUL posts from you, as well as possibly avoiding the very website that you are trying to promote. Since you chose to raise the topic, I will mention that your own posts to urg have done your own cause, whatever that might be, a great deal of harm, so why don't you just bugger off? The Bexhill Rose Society is doing everybody interested in roses a great service maintaining their excellent website. Don' worry though, once you've been in the newsgroups awhile, you're likely to catch on. Put that in front of a mirror. Franz |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:32:30 +0000 (UTC), "Franz Heymann"
wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:40:44 +0000 (UTC), "Martin" wrote: That must be good advice then if you have five books in agreement with our own article on pruning! Perhaps that say's something in itself? Yes, it says that, while it's OK to offer that *widely* available information on *your* web site (only one of dozens of websites that give the same information I might add), next time, please read the post before you promote your site instead of relying on a simple keyword to trigger some sort of quasiautoresponsebot sort of response. It will do your cause well, instead of causing people to ignore possible HELPFUL posts from you, as well as possibly avoiding the very website that you are trying to promote. Since you chose to raise the topic, I will mention that your own posts to urg have done your own cause, whatever that might be, a great deal of harm, so why don't you just bugger off? My cause, as you put it, was not to be lectured by someone when I'm trying to get information that was recently posted on this newsgroup. there's nothing new about pruning on the Bexrose site and I was specifically requesting information about a specific (even if Mr. Double thinks it's wrong) pruning method that sounded controversial enough to be interesting. The Bexhill Rose Society is doing everybody interested in roses a great service maintaining their excellent website. Well, you and I differ on the quality. It's not a bad site, but it's not "the best of the best", in my humble opinion. Not even close. I can guarantee you that I won't be monitoring it, giving Mr. Double any more "hits", as it matures. Don' worry though, once you've been in the newsgroups awhile, you're likely to catch on. Put that in front of a mirror. You first. Lecture all you want. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Answer to the straight cut pruning method - for the second time! | Gardening | |||
Answer to the straight cut pruning method - for the second time! | United Kingdom | |||
That odd straight across pruning method recently mentioned | Roses | |||
That odd straight across pruning method recently mentioned | United Kingdom | |||
Answer to the straight cut pruning method - for the second time! | Roses |