Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Wonderful CITES
Kenni Judd wrote: Nick: Surely you jest??? How do you suggest the inspecting authorities train their personnel to recognize these blooms, esp. after they've inevitably been damaged by shipping, when currently only a small percentage of either AOS judges or commercial growers might possibly be up to the task? And, BTW, how would you like to pay for that? No, I don't jest. A very small number of orchids are CITES Appendix 1. Since all Phrags and Paphs are listed, identifying them would be very easy. Apart from the slippers, there are what, seven other species on Appendix 1? How hard would it be to make up a checklist? All of the remaining species are already in cultivation in the U.S., so as you indicate, CITES only makes it difficult to obtain particular clones from abroad. Inspections are already required for imported plants, and I would expect that allowing only blooming plants would greatly reduce the volume of plants coming through the inspection stations. If there is increased costs, you could increase permit fees. I'm assuming that the main purpose is to limit smuggling of wild plants, and facilitating legal imports is secondary. Flasks would be unaffected by this suggestion. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Could a Non-Profit for gathering genitic samples of orchids get past CITES | Orchids | |||
Paphiopedilum vietnamense and Paphiopedilum hermannii CITES and the EU | Orchids | |||
Cites question | Orchids | |||
CITES: Dare we hope?? Is this for real???? | Orchids | |||
More Protection Urged for Rare Toothfish at CITES | Ponds |