Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
First Paph.
Ted Byers wrote:
Terrific. I take it, from what you say, that delenatii is both a prolific producer of seed and hardy to the point of being almost indestructible. Does it generally pass that on to hybrids it is used to make? Well, if I can grow it, perhaps indestructable. It is pretty bulletproof for a species. And in terms of seed, enough for my purposes, which was never more than a few flasks. Some crosses don't take. Some hybrids are not fertile. Most probably are, although all the combinations haven't been tried, of course. -- Rob's Rules: http://www.msu.edu/~halgren 1) There is always room for one more orchid 2) There is always room for two more orchids 2a. See rule 1 3) When one has insufficient credit to purchase more orchids, obtain more credit |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
First Paph.
Ted,
Rob certainly knows his Paph info...spot on everytime! Following on delenatii breeding..almost all delenatii crosses prove to be infertile beyond the initial crosses. Yes there are vigorous primary crosses (species x species) such as you have, but the next generations prove to be almost universally impossible. A great pity as many saw it a route for pink breeding. There are also some very difficult delantii crosses to flower such as Delrosi (P.delenatii x rothschildianum) you probably will have to wait a good 10 yrs plus to get them to flower. In passing most people in the volume business are now beginning to realise that you will never be able to produce large numbers of Parvisepalum hybrids. (Unless they get some super fertile clones - I believe there are some around but not many). A few hundred but never thousands from a pod. Most of the Dutch have given up on them as a pot plant. In passing if you want to explore some info on Paph breeding check out my website for a section on Paph seed. Regards Alan L Winthrop. www.tissuequickplantlabs.com Ted Byers wrote: Terrific. I take it, from what you say, that delenatii is both a prolific producer of seed and hardy to the point of being almost indestructible. Does it generally pass that on to hybrids it is used to make? Well, if I can grow it, perhaps indestructable. It is pretty bulletproof for a species. And in terms of seed, enough for my purposes, which was never more than a few flasks. Some crosses don't take. Some hybrids are not fertile. Most probably are, although all the combinations haven't been tried, of course. -- Rob's Rules: http://www.msu.edu/~halgren 1) There is always room for one more orchid 2) There is always room for two more orchids 2a. See rule 1 3) When one has insufficient credit to purchase more orchids, obtain more credit |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
First Paph.
Hi Alan,
"TQPL" wrote in message ... Ted, Rob certainly knows his Paph info...spot on everytime! This is good to hear. I could tell from the way he was writing that he knew more than most about the subject, but it is also good to hear confirmation from another expert. Following on delenatii breeding..almost all delenatii crosses prove to be infertile beyond the initial crosses. Yes there are vigorous primary crosses (species x species) such as you have, but the next generations prove to be almost universally impossible. A great pity as many saw it a route for pink breeding. Interesting. But if I were in the business of selling orchids, I'd swallow my disappointment in a breeding program that won't likely go anywhere and get on with the business of growing orchids. After all, if I have a P. delenatii and a P. moquettianum, and even if crossing the two will produce only 500 babies, and I grow them to about the size of my plant and sell them for the price I paid, that would provide a gross amount of C$20,000. I don't know how old my plant is, but given what I presently spend on maintaining my catts and phals and dends, I could probably raise a lot of orchids for a long time for that amount. It is a safe bet that if I produced phals, say a hybrid with Phal. amabilis being dominant, I'd get hundreds of thousands if not millions of seeds, most of which would be disposed of in some fashion simply because there is too much to handle. So, while in relative terms, a given cross may not be very productive, it may well be productive enough to allow one to make a profit from it. Maybe there is still an opportunity here ..... There are also some very difficult delantii crosses to flower such as Delrosi (P.delenatii x rothschildianum) you probably will have to wait a good 10 yrs plus to get them to flower. That's OK since P. rothschildianum doesn't appeal to me anyway, and so it isn't likely to appear in my collection anytime soon. :-) Different strokes for different folks, I guess. In passing most people in the volume business are now beginning to realise that you will never be able to produce large numbers of Parvisepalum hybrids. (Unless they get some super fertile clones - I believe there are some around but not many). A few hundred but never thousands from a pod. Most of the Dutch have given up on them as a pot plant. I suspect that this is a function of how you define "large numbers" and what your overhead is. A cross that produces a few hundred seed from a single pod, and assuming I had fertilized all the flowers (and the developing bud when it is ready), would increase the size of my collection of orchids by a factor of in excess of ten. Anyway, I would not have thought that the number of seed produced per pod would be a significant consderation, unless that number was only of the order of a few tens of seeds. After all, if your target total production is of the order of a few thousand, and you only get a few hundred seeds per pod, then you have to repeat the cross ten times on twenty flowers. If the act of doing the cross takes five minutes, then it would take about an hour to have enough pods to produce the desired amount of seed, relative to a different cross that poduces tens times as much seed per pod. It doesn't seem like doing the extra crosses with extra plants would make the project uneconomical since I'd expect that the cost of raising the seedlings would be much greater than the cost of manipulating the flowers producing the pods. In passing if you want to explore some info on Paph breeding check out my website for a section on Paph seed. Regards Alan L Winthrop. www.tissuequickplantlabs.com You have a nice, informative website. The only complaint I have is that it doesn't display correctly unless I tell Internet Explorer to use the smallest text size. Now, since my monitor is a good, high resolution one, such a small size makes your text quite hard to read. Even at that, you had a series of icons on one of your pages down the left side of the screen, and these were half obscured because the window they're in was too small. Might I suggest you revise your web pages so that they don't care what font size the user uses or what the specific properties of the users' monitors are? One of the things I like about HTML is that it makes doing this easy (when I produce HTML, I do so by hand and so don't have to worry about the quirks and inefficiencies inherent in those products that generate the HTML for you); after all, using HTML is not significantly harder than using punctuation in writing standard English. Thanks again, Ted |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Paph. Psyche x Paph Macabre | Orchid Photos | |||
Paph Margaret Crandall(Paph Vanguard 'Knob Creek' X moquetteanum) | Orchid Photos | |||
Paph kolopakingii x Paph praestans | Orchids | |||
First Paph, Attn: Dr. Mick Fournier | Orchids | |||
First Paph for me too! :-D | Orchids |