Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Apology to RGO newsgroup
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:26:24 GMT, "J Fortuna"
wrote in Message-Id: : I actually think that a much more serious offense is whenever we reply to pictures on abpo with meaningful and worthwhile textual content that could be of benefit to others. And I don't know whether that is an offense against the charter, but if it is not it really should be. Since abpo is not archived and many people have access only to rgo, these messages that really should be in rgo have a limited audience if they are not forwarded to rgo. It is a shame that the textural _information_ (as opposed to meaningless chit chat) posted in a.b.p.o is lost to posterity. However, binary newsgroups are specifically intended for binary files not text. Perhaps it should be suggested that _informational_ text message posted in a.b.p.o be cross posted to r.g.o. Would that would help? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
a public apology | Gardening | |||
Apology if Mad Bill Pal m er has been annoying members of rec.gardens? | Gardening | |||
Apology Accepted ... for what? | Ponds | |||
Apology Accepted | Ponds | |||
SNL Spartan Cheerleaders/ apology | Ponds |