Lc. Chairak Fire
Has anyone heard of this one ,the spelling could be wrong.
Bright orange red petals and sepals with a pink
lip. The outside of the cone shaped lip is
yellow / orange and there is some slight
orange
striping inside. The blooms are borne in
threes
and fours on stout stems.
--
Thanks Keith,Nottingham,England,UK.

keith ;-) schrieb:
Lc. Chairak Fire
Has anyone heard of this one ,the spelling could be wrong.
Bright orange red petals and sepals with a pink
lip. The outside of the cone shaped lip is
yellow / orange and there is some slight
orange
striping inside. The blooms are borne in
threes
and fours on stout stems.
Jairak Fire is Lc. Rojo x C. Thospol Spot. Can anyone Wildcatt it?

--
Reka

This is LIFE! It's not a rehearsal. Don't miss it!
http://www.rolbox.it/hukari/index.html

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:05:35 +0200, Reka
wrote:

keith ;-) schrieb:
Lc. Chairak Fire
Has anyone heard of this one ,the spelling could be wrong.
Bright orange red petals and sepals with a pink
lip. The outside of the cone shaped lip is
yellow / orange and there is some slight
orange
striping inside. The blooms are borne in
threes
and fours on stout stems.
Jairak Fire is Lc. Rojo x C. Thospol Spot. Can anyone Wildcatt it?

Wildcatt has Pot Jairak Beauty, Pot Jairak Delight, Lctna Jairak
Jewel, Pot Jairak Sparkle all registered in 2003 or 2004 by
K. Somboonphon. No Fire listed but Wildcatt is not current. And
he could have released it with the name before it was published.

SuE
http://orchids.legolas.org/gallery/albums.php

According to the RHS:

Laeliocattleya Jairak Fire = Laeliocattleya Rojo X Cattleya Thospol Spot
Reg 11/16/04

Cheers,
Xi

keith ;-) wrote:

Lc. Chairak Fire
Has anyone heard of this one ,the spelling could be wrong.
Bright orange red petals and sepals with a pink
lip. The outside of the cone shaped lip is
yellow / orange and there is some slight
orange
striping inside. The blooms are borne in
threes
and fours on stout stems.

Thanks all,Xi do you have problems with the Rhs orchid reg search.I tried to
search this plant but didn't get any hits until about the six time I
tried.Cant understand why?

--
Thanks Keith,Nottingham,England,UK.
"Xi Wang" wrote in message
news:wvg9e.1076811$6l.802391@pd7tw2no...
According to the RHS:

Laeliocattleya Jairak Fire = Laeliocattleya Rojo X Cattleya Thospol Spot
Reg 11/16/04

Cheers,
Xi

keith ;-) wrote:

Lc. Chairak Fire
Has anyone heard of this one ,the spelling could be wrong.
Bright orange red petals and sepals with a pink
lip. The outside of the cone shaped lip
is
yellow / orange and there is some slight
orange
striping inside. The blooms are borne in
threes
and fours on stout stems.

Well, I think the search thing has problems handling apostrophes, but
other than that, I haven't had any problems. If I wanted to search for
something like Phal. Nobby's Fox, you can't just type in Nobby's Fox
because that returns no hits. But with "s Fox" you do get the desired
results. The great thing about the RHS search site is that if you type
in something like abc, it returns results with "abc" anywhere in the
name, not just the beginning. Occasionally, the system is acting up
overall, but I've never had to do it 6 times to get a result. The
system is pretty accurate, and more up to date than Wildcatt probably
(but only for basic parentage information)...plus I have the
registration PDF files from the last 3 years saved on my harddrive .
This way, whatever is missing from the RHS site (it does take time to
update), I can still search through. These PDFs can also be downloaded
from their site.

Cheers,
Xi

keith ;-) wrote:
Thanks all,Xi do you have problems with the Rhs orchid reg search.I tried to
search this plant but didn't get any hits until about the six time I
tried.Cant understand why?

Also, the RHS site only lists the first few pages of the search results,
and there doesn't seem to be any way to adjust this. If I searched for
"es", which is probably found in literally thousands of names, it will
only list a few pages of hits. But this usually shouldn't be a problem.
If one is not sure about a name, but know 3-4 letters in it, all the
relevant results should still show up.

Cheers,
Xi

keith ;-) wrote:

Thanks all,Xi do you have problems with the Rhs orchid reg search.I
tried to
search this plant but didn't get any hits until about the six time I
tried.Cant understand why?

Thanks Xi,i am sure i will get used to it!

--
Thanks Keith,Nottingham,England,UK.
"Xi Wang" wrote in message
news:h5B9e.1085845$6l.482601@pd7tw2no...
Also, the RHS site only lists the first few pages of the search results,
and there doesn't seem to be any way to adjust this. If I searched for
"es", which is probably found in literally thousands of names, it will
only list a few pages of hits. But this usually shouldn't be a problem.
If one is not sure about a name, but know 3-4 letters in it, all the
relevant results should still show up.

Cheers,
Xi

keith ;-) wrote:

Thanks all,Xi do you have problems with the Rhs orchid reg search.I
tried to
search this plant but didn't get any hits until about the six time I
tried.Cant understand why?