Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Floral anatomy question
Cereoid+10 schreef
Calling the true dicots with 4-5 merous flowers "Core Eudicots" is redundant and unnecessary. + + + Since it is a distinct clade it deserves a distinct name. "Core Eudicots" may not be a thing of beauty, but is unambiguous + + + What is needed is a term to describe the primitive 3-merous false dicots!! + + + All the basal clades do have names. BTW There is no such thing as "false dicots" Although it has lost quite a bit of luster as a hypothesis for a natural grouping, "dicot" is still a name in current usage and none of the plants belonging to it are false. They all do exist. PvR |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
floral tools,floral garden tools,floral hand tools supplier in china | Australia | |||
Floral anatomy question OT | Plant Science | |||
Floral anatomy & Religion | Plant Science | |||
Floral anatomy question OT! Rinkytink | Plant Science | |||
Floral anatomy question - OT thanks to Beverly | Plant Science |