Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
sci.bio.botany is alive and well!
Its alive!!! Its alive!!!
I see doctor Frankenstein has gotten around to bringing the Rinkytink monster back to life. Fire bad? "P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message ... A quick look at Google shows that out of 16 sci.bio.* groups this NG is the second most active group. Just discount cereoid's attempt to bore everybody to death and this is a fine NG. PvR Let's rather discuss the desirability of including Celtis in the Cannabaceae |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
### Mini FAQ for sci.bio.botany # 012 ### | Plant Science | |||
### Mini FAQ for sci.bio.botany # 010 ### | Plant Science | |||
### Mini FAQ for sci.bio.botany # 005 ### | Plant Science | |||
### mini - FAQ for sci.bio.botany ( prototype ) ### | Plant Science | |||
FAQ in sci.bio.botany? | Plant Science |