Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Celtis & Cannabaceae
Let's rather discuss the desirability of including Celtis in the
Cannabaceae Iris Cohen schreef The older authorities, including IPNI (IK) include Celtis in the Ulmaceae, which belongs to the order Urticales. When did the above happen, & what is the rationale? + + + There is a difference in IPNI between IK which uses the original name of the family and Harvard which assigns it to a family of their own choosing. Actually it did not happen, but it is one of those things which could happen any moment, just like we lost Araliaceae, Flacourtiaceae and Epacridaceae, etc. If it does happen it may not hold, like Araliaceae which popped back up after having been deleted. Still it feels pretty weird losing Celtis from Ulmaceae, and even weirder to see it assigned to Cannabaceae. PvR |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
### Mini FAQ for sci.bio.botany # 012 ### | Plant Science | |||
### Mini FAQ for sci.bio.botany # 010 ### | Plant Science | |||
### Mini FAQ for sci.bio.botany # 005 ### | Plant Science | |||
### mini - FAQ for sci.bio.botany ( prototype ) ### | Plant Science | |||
FAQ in sci.bio.botany? | Plant Science |