LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27   Report Post  
Old 24-10-2004, 01:16 AM
Cereus-validus.
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You need to know what the box really is before you can think outside it.
Otherwise, all you are saying is pointless nonsense of no value whatsoever
in the real world. You come across just as deranged and clueless as brain
damaged Archie. Sure he uses a lot of jargon but he really doesn't know what
he is talking about.

What if Darwin got into the wayback machine and screwed Eve when Adam was
out looking for fig leaves? What if pigs could fly? So what?


"Peter Jason" wrote in message
...
I'ts called "thinking ouside of the box" Cereus Brutus. Can't you take

any
idea not in the text books?
'Ol Serious Invalidated becomes disphasic and disoriented when presented
with some new idea.
At least I don't smoke old cigarette butts.

"Cereus-validus." wrote in message
om...
Oh no, Peter has been smoking Archie's stash again.

When you're tripping, can you smell colors and see sounds? Just curious,
would never do that nasty stuff myself.


"Peter Jason" wrote in message
...
I have a theory that birds are descended from insects, because:
1/ Insects knew how to fly already (being small, these creatures could

take
advantage of the slightest breeze to become and remain airborne.)
2/ The avian lung is more like the insect's system, and remote from

those
of
dinosaurs/reptiles.
3/ Insects have wings already.
4/ Insects have been around longer.
5/ Insects have shorter generations allowing faster natural selection.



"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message
...
Archimedes Plutonium schreef
So that is a nice compounding for animals. The compounding of hair

into
that of multi-hair which ends up as becoming feathers.

*****
Right, birds and plants with compound leafs are birds of a feather
* * *

So then, since compounding is a ongoing phenomenon for both the

Plant
Kingdom as well as the Animal Kingdom that we must ask the question

as
to what is the source of this tendency to compound within biological
kingdoms.

*****
Energy efficiency
* * *

Darwin Evolution would spring in to say that the source for the

tendency
or proclivity to compound in Nature is due to the fact that DNA is
itself a compound symmetry for it is not a single helix but a

double
helix.

*****
Darwin did not know about DNA and certainly had nothing to say about

it
* * *

So life on Earth in a million years hence in the future, if it

survives
will have compounded in ways hardly imagineable to us today.

*****
Evolution moves slowly, but who knows how the influence of Man wiil

work
out



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why ? Why ? Why? David Hill United Kingdom 15 29-08-2014 06:18 PM
University of Utah scientists discovered a strange method of reproduction in primitive plants named cycads chatnoir Plant Science 0 07-10-2007 12:53 AM
primitive plant vincent Plant Science 22 18-09-2003 02:22 PM
Aspirin rooting compound Franz Heymann United Kingdom 6 17-08-2003 08:02 PM
Tree-killing chemical compound? Arsenio Oloroso Jr. Gardening 7 14-05-2003 07:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017