Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old 25-12-2007, 09:25 PM posted to rec.ponds
gs gs is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Dec 2007
Posts: 1
Default 2008 McLaren now offiically 'clean'

grammar was always sacrificed to it
when it seemed necessary. And rightly so, since what was required, above
all for political purposes, was short clipped words of unmistakable meaning
which could be uttered rapidly and which roused the minimum of echoes in
the speaker's mind. The words of the B vocabulary even gained in force from
the fact that nearly all of them were very much alike. Almost invariably
these words -- goodthink, Minipax, prolefeed, sexcrime, joycamp, Ingsoc,
bellyfeel, thinkpol, and countless others -- were words of two or three
syllables, with the stress distributed equally between the first syllable
and the last. The use of them encouraged a gabbling style of speech, at
once staccato and monotonous. And this was exactly what was aimed at. The
intention was to make speech, and especially speech on any subject not
ideologically neutral, as nearly as possible independent of consciousness.
For the purposes of everyday life it was no doubt necessary, or sometimes
necessary, to reflect before speaking, but a Party member called upon to
make a political or ethical judgement should be able to spray forth the
correct opinions as automatically as a machine gun spraying forth bullets.
His training fitted him to do this, the language gave him an almost
foolproof instrument, and the texture of the words, with their harsh sound
and a certain wilful ugliness which was in accord with the spirit of
Ingsoc, assisted the process still further.
So did the fact of having very few words to choose from. Relative to
our own, the Newspeak vocabulary was tiny, and new ways of reducing it were
constantly being devised. Newspeak, indeed, differed from most all other
languages in that its vocabulary grew smaller instead of larger every year.
Each reduction was a gain, since the smaller the area of choice, the
smaller the temptation to take thought. Ultimately it was hoped to make
art


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lenon McLaren! Aku Texas 0 14-12-2008 06:01 AM
qPCR NEWS 11-2008 - Event Calendar Winter 2008 Editor www.Gene-Quantification.info Plant Science 0 28-11-2008 08:19 AM
let's kill in the clean structures, but don't clean the difficult raindrops Jethro United Kingdom 0 01-09-2005 03:47 PM
How Clean is Clean? BenignVanilla Ponds 13 02-04-2004 03:44 AM
How Clean is Clean? BenignVanilla Ponds 1 01-04-2004 08:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017