Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
In article , dave weil
writes On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 06:05:01 +0000 (UTC), "Franz Heymann" wrote: In that case, take the trouble to read them correctly. Franz Martin: bigbe1.bellsouth.net!bigfeed2.bellsouth.net!news. bellsouth.net!elnk-atl- nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newshosting.com!nx02.i ad01.newshosting.com!ne wsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.tisc ali.de!news.belwue.de!n ews.uni-stuttgart.de!carbon.eu.sun.com!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworl d.com!not-for-mail Franz: bigbe1.bellsouth.net!bigfeed2.bellsouth.net!news. bellsouth.net!cyclone1. gnilink.net!gnilink.net!peer01.cox.net!cox.net!ne wshosting.com!nx02.iad0 1.newshosting.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjser v.net!feed.news.tiscali .de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!carbon.eu.sun.com!btnet-feed5!b tnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail Whoops...close enough for me... Then you prove you don't understand headers. Both use the same isp, so its not surpriding that posts take the same route. All those headers are is the route news takes. If you look at the other headers, you'll see that the versions of Outlook used are different (not conclusive in itself, but in conjunction with the totally different posting styles and contents, its pretty obvious to me that they are not the same.) BUSTED. Now wait for the wrongful arrest charges. -- regards andyw |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:36:17 +0100, newsb
wrote: If you look at the other headers, you'll see that the versions of Outlook used are different (not conclusive in itself, but in conjunction with the totally different posting styles and contents, its pretty obvious to me that they are not the same.) Certainly not conclusive in itself. Heck, I've got two different versions of Outlook Express on two different computers in this very room (I never bohered upgrading the one on the seldom used computer in the network, mainly because I don't even bother using Outlook in the first place). But if I *did* use Outlook, depending on which computer I used, that would determine the version of Outlook on my headers. If I had a work computer, which I don't, I'd bet that it would be different as well. And a possible laptop? Sure, might be a fourth one. As to the "totally different posting styles and contents", that's what sockpuppeting is all about, innit? That's some crazy people that they have using that ISP which suddenly starts popping up on rec. garden.roses. It *must* be a coincidence, since that ISP is as huge as demon... |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:36:17 +0100, newsb
wrote: If you look at the other headers, you'll see that the versions of Outlook used are different (not conclusive in itself, but in conjunction with the totally different posting styles and contents, its pretty obvious to me that they are not the same.) Certainly not conclusive in itself. Heck, I've got two different versions of Outlook Express on two different computers in this very room (I never bohered upgrading the one on the seldom used computer in the network, mainly because I don't even bother using Outlook in the first place). But if I *did* use Outlook, depending on which computer I used, that would determine the version of Outlook on my headers. If I had a work computer, which I don't, I'd bet that it would be different as well. And a possible laptop? Sure, might be a fourth one. As to the "totally different posting styles and contents", that's what sockpuppeting is all about, innit? That's some crazy people that they have using that ISP which suddenly starts popping up on rec. garden.roses. It *must* be a coincidence, since that ISP is as huge as demon... |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
"dave weil" wrote in message ... [snip] That's some crazy people that they have using that ISP which suddenly starts popping up on rec. garden.roses. It *must* be a coincidence, since that ISP is as huge as demon... You are once again showing what a failure you are as far as deductive powers are concerned. The ISP I use is run by British Telephone, which is the major telephone company in the UK, so it is not a notable coincidence if two urglers use it. If you had had any powers of observation, you would also by now have noticed that I make no secret of the fact that I live at the top of Wensleydale and the Martin who supports the Bexhill Rose Society posts from Bexhill (there are at least 3 Martins who participate in urg). If you knew how to use a ruler, and you could lay your hands on a map of the UK in that benighted part of the world you live in, you might be able to establish for yourself that the distance between those places is more than 300 miles. Franz |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
"dave weil" wrote in message ... [snip] That's some crazy people that they have using that ISP which suddenly starts popping up on rec. garden.roses. It *must* be a coincidence, since that ISP is as huge as demon... You are once again showing what a failure you are as far as deductive powers are concerned. The ISP I use is run by British Telephone, which is the major telephone company in the UK, so it is not a notable coincidence if two urglers use it. If you had had any powers of observation, you would also by now have noticed that I make no secret of the fact that I live at the top of Wensleydale and the Martin who supports the Bexhill Rose Society posts from Bexhill (there are at least 3 Martins who participate in urg). If you knew how to use a ruler, and you could lay your hands on a map of the UK in that benighted part of the world you live in, you might be able to establish for yourself that the distance between those places is more than 300 miles. Franz |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Answer to the straight cut pruning method - for the second time! | Gardening | |||
Answer to the straight cut pruning method - for the second time! | United Kingdom | |||
That odd straight across pruning method recently mentioned | Gardening | |||
That odd straight across pruning method recently mentioned | United Kingdom | |||
Answer to the straight cut pruning method - for the second time! | Roses |