LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16   Report Post  
Old 07-05-2006, 11:56 AM posted to uk.rec.gardening
Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default SOIL POISONING by BEECH TREES


"Nick Maclaren" wrote in message
...

I have Web access, but had to retype :-( Here is the relevant source
in Cross, which shows how these urban myths develop by the simplification
and extrapolation of ambiguous scientific results.

Doekson (1964) found that ground up leaves of rhododendrons caused a
reduction in the number of earthworms (Lumbricus rubellus Hoffmeister)
in peaty soil. The substance responsible was soluble in acetone, but
not in ethanol, ether or benzene. He also observed a reduction in the
numbers of L. rubellus and Allolobophora callignosa Savigny in the
soil in which rhododendrons were planted, even without the addition
of ground-up leaves. However, Lumbricus rubellus is common in the
Rhododendron humus in the Killarney woods.

Although the soils at sites 18-10 would have been greatly influenced
by Rhododendron, being almost pure stands, there is no obvious
difference with other soils. It is, however, probable that in common
with other ericaceous species, Rhododendron has a deleterious effect
on the soil, mobilising cations, directly or indirectly by the production
of phenols. Rangaswami & Verkatswarku (1966) report the presence of
polyphenols in other species of the genus, and Raudnitz (1957) has
found a humic acid in the leaves to be a water-soluble, surface-active
polyphoric ester. ...

Yeah, well. One person has found a reduction in earthworms, and another
has found little or no reduction. Several people have detected common
plant toxins (surprise, surprise!) Not a lot of evidence there.

In several other places in that paper (quoted), it referred to the
physical effects I described, and one that I did not - rhododendron
humus apparently forms a hard surface when baked in the sun.

Frankly, I don't believe that the toxin effects of either R. ponticum
or J. niger are important - whereas the physical ones of many thicket-
and canopy-forming plants with large leaves most definitely are. You
just have to look for yourself to see the latter! But it is amazing
how few scientists ever do look for themselves, as Rackham points out!


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.


I am totally with you on this one.
At my previous house we used the leafmould in volume from beneath the
Rhododendrons as a seed and potting compost without any bad effects.
It was also noticeable that the areas that had been scraped clear of debris
became host to a majority of the common garden weeds.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poisoning trees? Peter Jason Plant Science 1 15-07-2012 07:01 PM
Poisoning of trees Sandra Bodycoat Australia 4 01-03-2006 04:27 AM
Poisoning snails - poisoning birds? Andy Hunt United Kingdom 31 10-04-2004 06:04 PM
getting rid of weeds without poisoning my tree rgree United Kingdom 25 01-10-2003 08:09 AM
Is Monsanto Poisoning Consumers with Pesticide Residues Just another fan Gardening 0 27-08-2003 01:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017