Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
"Uncle Marvo" wrote in message
Why would anyone want to google what someone had said in a completely unrelated newsgroup anyway? Marvo, why don't you ask yourself why you feel compelled to cast Janet, rather than Puce, as the villian in this piece? Puce has done google searches on Janet and myself and others. If you had been paying attention, she made a crack here a couple of days ago about how someone else who posts here was posting to a sex group. So she either posts/reads the sex group or she went googling. I see nothing wrong with googling. It's just like looking up a reference. Puce is entitled to do it as is Janet or anyone else. What has Ms Puce done to you, Janet , to get this response? You admire Puce for her ability to stand up for herself but not Janet. You criticise Janet for looking up google groups but not Puce. You ask what Puce has done to Janet but not what Puce has done to Janet. You don't seem to notice when Puce makes nasty cracks but yet describe Puce as the one who is being "taunted". You should also know by now from others and Puce's own admission, that Puce went stalking Janet and Puce said she did this because she was angry. There is absolutley nothing wrong with Puce being angry but she went STALKING! Doesn't the act of stalking ring a bell about paranoid or at the least, very odd, behaviour in your head? I swallowed Puce's line that she was young (mea culpa - I should have gone googling). Someone in their forties cannot consider themselves to be "young" unless they have a rather unusual grasp on reality or are deliberately lying. Either way, it's a clue to be wary of the individual. I have to contrast the Puce I've seen with Janet. I know which one of them I'd trust to look after my mail and not open it. You have clearly chosen otherwise. I have read Janet for years. I have never, ever known her to lie (and you'll have to take my word for it given that you are obviously casting Janet as the villian). Janet can be hard nosed, but NEVER a liar or prone to flights of fancy. All in all, I find your conclusions about who is being bitchy or doing what to whom, to be very odd, and especially if you have already had a paranoid control freak in your life. That experience should have taught you something about the more venal side of human personalities and how to be wary of collecting more such people in your life. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
Farm1 wrote: Puce has done google searches on Janet and myself and others. Wrong. I have found Janet on rural.farm forum where she was having yet again an arguement with somebody. I took my chance, and took my revenge. You came along backing janet and a chap followed you back in urg. When in urg this chap asks you why you were so surprised to find people 'taking their chances and replying on other forums' if it isn't because they are angry and frustrated. If you had been paying attention, she made a crack here a couple of days ago about how someone else who posts here was posting to a sex group. That's right. Rupert has posted to sex.stories. Fact. So she either posts/reads the sex group or she went googling. I see nothing wrong with googling. It's just like looking up a reference. Puce is entitled to do it as is Janet or anyone else. I went googling on Rupert because from the start I find that he's a con. The only tool he uses in his garden is his computer. His answers are always 'I don't know but someone will come along shortly to tell you the anwer'. He had a go at me. I had a go at him. He wrote to me once on email, drunk, saying that Janet was rude. Sadly I cannot prove this as I clear my emails regularly. But I had mentioned it once and since then he's been even more horrible. I don't blame him, he needs to suck all the info he gets for whatever 'secret' online business he is yet again to explain clearly to anyone here. You admire Puce for her ability to stand up for herself but not Janet. You criticise Janet for looking up google groups but not Puce. You ask what Puce has done to Janet but not what Puce has done to Janet. Interesting that - puce has done to janet but not what puce has done to janet. LOL! That truly says it all. Doesn't the act of stalking ring a bell about paranoid or at the least, very odd, behaviour in your head? I went on a forum which I have visited many times but never contributed because I don't live in a rural environment but I find the discussions interesting. When I found Janet taunting another person I took my chance to reply and a few posters took also the chance to say what they had to say about Janet. Coincidence - I don't think so. Obvious releif for everybody. You came on urg to stalk me back ...! I swallowed Puce's line that she was young (mea culpa - I should have gone googling). Yes I'm young. Compared to you, Janet, Sacha, Judith, Sue .... and many other. I'm 42. How old are you? And who are you 'Farm1'? Someone in their forties cannot consider themselves to be "young" unless they have a rather unusual grasp on reality or are deliberately lying. Either way, it's a clue to be wary of the individual. I am young at heart, I am young physically, I'm fit and healthy, I meet lots of people, I travel, I work, I keep busy. What do you do? I have read Janet for years. I have never, ever known her to lie She lies about me. She lied within 2 posts trying to tell everyone that I was a troll. That's lying. All in all, I find your conclusions about who is being bitchy or doing what to whom, to be very odd, and especially if you have already had a paranoid control freak in your life. That experience should have taught you something about the more venal side of human personalities and how to be wary of collecting more such people in your life. You have quite some cheeks to tell a stranger what to think after his own experiences, you who backs up a persistant rude poster, experienced gardener I agree, but rude none the less, you persisting to carrying in on this stupid situation which has nothing to do with you. If you were as intelligent as you say you are, you wouldn't carry on your vendetta and return to do what you do best which is talk gardening and enjoy the sharing of ideas. I might appear radical, a bit brutal at times, but that's me. Janet is rude, I'm forward. I'm not sure what you are beside pocking your nose in other people's stories. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
"La Puce" wrote in message oups.com... snip That's right. Rupert has posted to sex.stories. Fact. Fiction, as is most of the other rubbish you write. I went googling on Rupert because from the start I find that he's a con. Me, my window box and a copy of Hessayon are all I need He wrote to me once on email, drunk, saying that Janet was rude. Sadly I cannot prove this as I clear my emails regularly. Don't let the absence of an email prevent you producing a load of rubbish. I would have to be exceptionally drunk to communicate with someone like yourself and my comments on people tend to be rather verbose. So the word rude would have read more like my description of you:- "Ageing deformed vitriolic individual who takes delight in involving innocents in her perverted life. Phantom of the Opera-eat ya heart out." I don't blame him, he needs to suck all the info he gets for whatever 'secret' online business he is yet again to explain clearly to anyone here. If I had secrets they would never be shared with someone like you. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
On 9/10/06 11:50, in article , "Rupert (W.Yorkshire)"
wrote: "La Puce" wrote in message oups.com... snip That's right. Rupert has posted to sex.stories. Fact. Fiction, as is most of the other rubbish you write. I went googling on Rupert because from the start I find that he's a con. Me, my window box and a copy of Hessayon are all I need He wrote to me once on email, drunk, saying that Janet was rude. Sadly I cannot prove this as I clear my emails regularly. Don't let the absence of an email prevent you producing a load of rubbish. Rupert, I really don't think anyone believes her, or is likely to. We've been through all this with her many times. Someone as devious and dishonest as she is would keep such emails as weaponry, if they existed. She might well use the headers and 'embellish' the emails to her own liking. If you have someone's email header it's an easy thing to do and I've suffered from it, long ago, so I know a reproduced email means absolutely nothing. I would have to be exceptionally drunk to communicate with someone like yourself and my comments on people tend to be rather verbose. So the word rude would have read more like my description of you:- "Ageing deformed vitriolic individual who takes delight in involving innocents in her perverted life. Phantom of the Opera-eat ya heart out." I don't blame him, he needs to suck all the info he gets for whatever 'secret' online business he is yet again to explain clearly to anyone here. If I had secrets they would never be shared with someone like you. Well, as you've told me what (some) of your interests are, I can testify to urg there is nothing sinister or illegal going on via this group! The groups you post to or don't post to are your business and nobody else's. Making up lies about emails is one of Puce's standard ploys, so I doubt anyone is particularly surprised to see her use it again. She has lied over and over again about many people, many places, many 'conversations'. She lied when she said this place is 'dark'. In fact, as you enter and visible from the lane, there are two huge flower borders, each about 80' long and 12' wide, literally blazing with colour and there is an open field with a young oak avenue, plus a lime walk, on it. Puce and the truth are total strangers. By now, I hope those previously deluded know what she's like. We all have people we like or dislike in newsgroups, just as we do in real life. That's normal. What is not normal is the huge volume of personal insult and abuse this 'young' woman (who is in fact middle aged if she lives to be 84!) has heaped on people here is some kind of dreadful record for this group. Other than the obviously deranged, I don't think there's ever been anything remotely like it here. This woman says she's leaving urg and I suggest we hope she does so and means it. The more attention she gets now, the more she will justify remaining here or returning. urg has never been through a period as low as since she barged in here. Luckily, most seem to have her kill filed or just ignore her altogether. Let's hope she does go and stops the shouting back through the keyhole business. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
"Sacha" wrote in message ... On 9/10/06 11:50, in article , "Rupert (W.Yorkshire)" wrote: "La Puce" wrote in message oups.com... snip That's right. Rupert has posted to sex.stories. Fact. Fiction, as is most of the other rubbish you write. I went googling on Rupert because from the start I find that he's a con. Me, my window box and a copy of Hessayon are all I need He wrote to me once on email, drunk, saying that Janet was rude. Sadly I cannot prove this as I clear my emails regularly. Don't let the absence of an email prevent you producing a load of rubbish. Rupert, I really don't think anyone believes her, or is likely to. We've been through all this with her many times. Someone as devious and dishonest as she is would keep such emails as weaponry, if they existed. She might well use the headers and 'embellish' the emails to her own liking. If you have someone's email header it's an easy thing to do and I've suffered from it, long ago, so I know a reproduced email means absolutely nothing. I would have to be exceptionally drunk to communicate with someone like yourself and my comments on people tend to be rather verbose. So the word rude would have read more like my description of you:- "Ageing deformed vitriolic individual who takes delight in involving innocents in her perverted life. Phantom of the Opera-eat ya heart out." I don't blame him, he needs to suck all the info he gets for whatever 'secret' online business he is yet again to explain clearly to anyone here. If I had secrets they would never be shared with someone like you. Well, as you've told me what (some) of your interests are, I can testify to urg there is nothing sinister or illegal going on via this group! The groups you post to or don't post to are your business and nobody else's. Making up lies about emails is one of Puce's standard ploys, so I doubt anyone is particularly surprised to see her use it again. She has lied over and over again about many people, many places, many 'conversations'. She lied when she said this place is 'dark'. In fact, as you enter and visible from the lane, there are two huge flower borders, each about 80' long and 12' wide, literally blazing with colour and there is an open field with a young oak avenue, plus a lime walk, on it. Puce and the truth are total strangers. By now, I hope those previously deluded know what she's like. We all have people we like or dislike in newsgroups, just as we do in real life. That's normal. What is not normal is the huge volume of personal insult and abuse this 'young' woman (who is in fact middle aged if she lives to be 84!) has heaped on people here is some kind of dreadful record for this group. Other than the obviously deranged, I don't think there's ever been anything remotely like it here. This woman says she's leaving urg and I suggest we hope she does so and means it. The more attention she gets now, the more she will justify remaining here or returning. urg has never been through a period as low as since she barged in here. Luckily, most seem to have her kill filed or just ignore her altogether. Let's hope she does go and stops the shouting back through the keyhole business. -- Sacha South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ Now I wonder who is rattled and worried :-))) That sure was some tirade!! I guess that it is just someone else Sacha doesn't like :-))) Someone not in the kissy kissy huggy huggy brigade. :-)) Mike |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
In article , Sacha
writes Other than the obviously deranged, I don't think there's ever been anything remotely like it here. As this person has lied about me I feel justified in commenting. I did a profile on her last week as I could not believe that she only behaves badly in this group. One of the places she posted to was a "Local" group. You really have to see what they say about her there - she is accused of lying and being a troll, distorting facts and never admitting when she has been found out and is in the wrong and added to that, her language is that of the gutter. It's a great shame that we have allowed her to disrupt us; we often have disagreements over the garden fence but we have never sunk to telling outright lies and being abusive to our neighbours, by threatening to come to see them and in trying to destroy their good name with false allegations i.e. alleging certain things about Rupert and calling him disgusting. That is beyond the pale and in my view, there is no way back for her. A spat over the garden fence I can accept but what Puce has done, I will never accept. I have really enjoyed this forum for years and I know that these type of people pop in and pop out so hopefully a little bit of patience will be rewarded. Note for Puce: if you want to attack me, do so, if that is all you have to do, but not through this forum, take it to email, you can write in French or English, I am fluent in both. -- Judith Lea |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Biodynamics: 2000 cherry tomatoes from a single plant! | Gardening |