On 24 Feb, 17:04, Martin wrote:
On 24 Feb 2007 07:50:21 -0800, "

wrote:
On 24 Feb, 15:35, Martin wrote:
Not here, just as Mike doesn't on all groups.
Hi Martin, how is it in Holland today, it's wet and windy and dreary
at Norwich so I expect you have similar weather?

Exactly the same, but it's Saturday and to be expected.

I don't want to talk about Andy M.
--

Martin

That's fine Martin, I don't know Andy or anything about him so lets
move on to gardening.

On 24/2/07 15:35, in article ,
"Martin" wrote:

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:31:41 +0000, Sacha
wrote:
snip

Andy was a popular and knowledgeable member of this group which, to this
group is all that matters, I suppose? Like a lot of us, he held strong
opinions but I never recall him being insulting or spiteful or writing posts
just for the sake of annoying or hurting others.

Not here, just as Mike doesn't on all groups.

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group. It's only when people try to *use* people's posts to
other groups to stir up trouble in this (or that) group that it matters,
IMO. Following people round the internet and constantly referring to their
behaviour on 'other groups' is simply trying to make trouble in the
'innocent' group, it seems to me. The characters and dynamics of each group
are different, so people may well react differently on one to another. I
know what I think of the behaviour of certain people here, the good, the bad
and even the moderately attractive and here is what counts when I'm here.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

On 24/2/07 16:52, in article , "BAC"
wrote:


"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

snip

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

He has been posting on uk.environment.conservation for a while now,
primarily, it seems, to feud with Angus Macmillan, so the evidence suggests
he is far from fed up either with carping or usenet.


Maybe he's fed up with Angus Macmillan? I wouldn't know. But everyone has
their particular bugbears.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

On 24 Feb, 18:44, Sacha wrote:

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group.

LOL!!! Sorry, this tickled me far too much.

"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , Alan Holmes
writes

"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , Sacha
writes
On 23/2/07 22:15, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net
Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable. Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Check out what Crowe has done to Mabbett on Usenet.

Why should I want to do that? As said, I have found Andy to be friendly
and knowledgeable. I am certainly not interested wasting time finding
out
what someone else thinks of him.

But this might tell you why Andy has decided to avoid this newsgroup!

It also means going to Google and trailing though past posts. I am not
that interested, have better things to do and find that activity rather
sordid.

Well I have to admit that if I would have to use google, I'd forget it as
well!

Alan

--
June Hughes

In message . com,
" writes
On 24 Feb, 17:04, Martin wrote:
On 24 Feb 2007 07:50:21 -0800, "

wrote:
On 24 Feb, 15:35, Martin wrote:
Not here, just as Mike doesn't on all groups.
Hi Martin, how is it in Holland today, it's wet and windy and dreary
at Norwich so I expect you have similar weather?

Exactly the same, but it's Saturday and to be expected.

I don't want to talk about Andy M.
--

Martin

That's fine Martin, I don't know Andy or anything about him so lets
move on to gardening.

You knew Andy many years ago. You must have forgotten.
--
June Hughes

On 25 Feb, 09:57, Martin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:37:23 +0000, June Hughes
wrote:

In message . com,
" writes
That's fine Martin, I don't know Andy or anything about him so lets
move on to gardening.

You knew Andy many years ago. You must have forgotten.

Nobody forgets Andy.
--

Martin

No, I don't remember Andy and I am absolutely sure of that.

Judith still at home

In message om,
" writes
On 25 Feb, 09:57, Martin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:37:23 +0000, June Hughes

wrote:

In message . com,
" writes
That's fine Martin, I don't know Andy or anything about him so lets
move on to gardening.

You knew Andy many years ago. You must have forgotten.

Nobody forgets Andy.
--

Martin

No, I don't remember Andy and I am absolutely sure of that.

I think but am not sure, that he was on the demon new users' group.
User name similar to 'pigsmayfly' or something. Doesn't really matter
anyway. He's not here.


--
June Hughes

"Martin" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:37:23 +0000, June Hughes

wrote:

In message . com,
" writes

That's fine Martin, I don't know Andy or anything about him so lets
move on to gardening.

You knew Andy many years ago. You must have forgotten.

Nobody forgets Andy.

I have!

--

Martin

On 25 Feb, 13:48, Martin wrote:
On 25 Feb 2007 04:01:26 -0800, "





wrote:
On 25 Feb, 09:57, Martin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:37:23 +0000, June Hughes
wrote:

In message . com,
" writes
That's fine Martin, I don't know Andy or anything about him so lets
move on to gardening.

You knew Andy many years ago. You must have forgotten.

Nobody forgets Andy.
--

Martin

No, I don't remember Andy and I am absolutely sure of that.

Judith still at home

You can buy his book cheaphttp://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?sts=t&an=Mabbett%2C+And...
--

Martin- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I don't think so thank you Martin, I was never into Pink Floyd, now if
it was the Who.

Judith who is still home

In message , Sacha
writes
On 24/2/07 15:35, in article ,
"Martin" wrote:

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:31:41 +0000, Sacha
wrote:
snip

Andy was a popular and knowledgeable member of this group which, to this
group is all that matters, I suppose? Like a lot of us, he held strong
opinions but I never recall him being insulting or spiteful or writing posts
just for the sake of annoying or hurting others.

Not here, just as Mike doesn't on all groups.

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group. It's only when people try to *use* people's posts to
other groups to stir up trouble in this (or that) group that it matters,
IMO. Following people round the internet and constantly referring to their
behaviour on 'other groups' is simply trying to make trouble in the
'innocent' group, it seems to me. The characters and dynamics of each group
are different, so people may well react differently on one to another. I
know what I think of the behaviour of certain people here, the good, the bad
and even the moderately attractive and here is what counts when I'm here.

Yes. Do you mean just like you followed me to ukfd and tried to get me
frog-marched out. Didn't work did it, Sacha?
--
June Hughes

On 25/2/07 16:28, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes
On 24/2/07 15:35, in article ,
"Martin" wrote:

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:31:41 +0000, Sacha
wrote:
snip

Andy was a popular and knowledgeable member of this group which, to this
group is all that matters, I suppose? Like a lot of us, he held strong
opinions but I never recall him being insulting or spiteful or writing
posts
just for the sake of annoying or hurting others.

Not here, just as Mike doesn't on all groups.

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group. It's only when people try to *use* people's posts to
other groups to stir up trouble in this (or that) group that it matters,
IMO. Following people round the internet and constantly referring to their
behaviour on 'other groups' is simply trying to make trouble in the
'innocent' group, it seems to me. The characters and dynamics of each group
are different, so people may well react differently on one to another. I
know what I think of the behaviour of certain people here, the good, the bad
and even the moderately attractive and here is what counts when I'm here.

Yes. Do you mean just like you followed me to ukfd and tried to get me
frog-marched out. Didn't work did it, Sacha?

June, I am really very, very sorry for you because your life seems to be one
never-ending grudge bearing whine.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

In message , Sacha
writes
On 25/2/07 16:28, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group. It's only when people try to *use* people's posts to
other groups to stir up trouble in this (or that) group that it matters,
IMO. Following people round the internet and constantly referring to their
behaviour on 'other groups' is simply trying to make trouble in the
'innocent' group, it seems to me. The characters and dynamics of each group
are different, so people may well react differently on one to another. I
know what I think of the behaviour of certain people here, the good, the bad
and even the moderately attractive and here is what counts when I'm here.

Yes. Do you mean just like you followed me to ukfd and tried to get me
frog-marched out. Didn't work did it, Sacha?

June, I am really very, very sorry for you because your life seems to be one
never-ending grudge bearing whine.

Was that a whine? I thought it was a statement of fact. Silly me!
Never mind, Sacha. Whatever you say. After all, you always have the
last word and are always right about everything - not People tell me
you are a pleasant woman in real life.
--
June Hughes

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:15:52 +0000, June Hughes
wrote:

In message , 'Mike'
writes
From a recent posting:

Come back Andy Mabbett - all is forgiven.
--
Regards,

Hugh Jampton


Now that would be interesting because I seem to remember Andy 'Net Nanny'
Mabbett was very keen on enforcing the '4 line signature' rule.

:-)))

I wonder if he would still be so keen under the circumstances ;-)))))

Let's see.

Over many years, I have found Andy Mabbett to be friendly and
knowledgeable.

I have found him to be obnoxious, a liar, cheat, criminal and fraud
who is very keen that his details should be removed from official
offices, and also keen to avoid ID cards. I wonder why? Is the answer
here.........

http://tinyurl.com/22xgpr

http://tinyurl.com/2as9j4


Perhaps he has got a bit fed-up with the carping on
Usenet?

Considering Mabbett is usually the cause of much carping on usenet,
that's ironic!

Although to his credit these days, he is only 10% as obnoxious and
creepy as he used to be. He has been taught very hard lessons along
the way.
--









Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:39:42 +0000, June Hughes
wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes
On 25/2/07 16:28, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes

I don't really care what people do on other groups because they're not the
business of this group. It's only when people try to *use* people's posts to
other groups to stir up trouble in this (or that) group that it matters,
IMO. Following people round the internet and constantly referring to their
behaviour on 'other groups' is simply trying to make trouble in the
'innocent' group, it seems to me. The characters and dynamics of each group
are different, so people may well react differently on one to another. I
know what I think of the behaviour of certain people here, the good, the bad
and even the moderately attractive and here is what counts when I'm here.

Yes. Do you mean just like you followed me to ukfd and tried to get me
frog-marched out. Didn't work did it, Sacha?

June, I am really very, very sorry for you because your life seems to be one
never-ending grudge bearing whine.

Was that a whine? I thought it was a statement of fact. Silly me!
Never mind, Sacha. Whatever you say. After all, you always have the
last word and are always right about everything - not People tell me
you are a pleasant woman in real life.

Its FEMALE!
--









Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.