Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What evidence is there for this?
What evidence is there for this?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/365...ust-warns.html Or is it the National Trust just scaremongering to get rid of plants it dislikes? If oaks have the disease should they not be culled? Angus Macmillan www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org www.con-servation.org.uk All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What evidence is there for this?
wrote What evidence is there for this? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/365...ust-warns.html Or is it the National Trust just scaremongering to get rid of plants it dislikes? If oaks have the disease should they not be culled? Oaks are very much a British native and Rhododendron ponticum isn't. It does invade woodland and stops any undergrowth as light is excluded from the ground permanently, they being evergreens. Even forest fire does not kill them completely as they come back from the roots, seen that myself. For that reason alone they should be removed but when you add in the fact that they incubate/carry the dreaded disease that potentially will decimate our oaks then IMO they must be removed ASAP. This is one case where we can remove the invader and should. -- Regards Bob Hobden |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What evidence is there for this?
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 22:57:48 -0000, "Bob Hobden"
wrote: wrote What evidence is there for this? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/365...ust-warns.html Or is it the National Trust just scaremongering to get rid of plants it dislikes? If oaks have the disease should they not be culled? Oaks are very much a British native and Rhododendron ponticum isn't. It does invade woodland and stops any undergrowth as light is excluded from the ground permanently, they being evergreens. Even forest fire does not kill them completely as they come back from the roots, seen that myself. For that reason alone they should be removed but when you add in the fact that they incubate/carry the dreaded disease that potentially will decimate our oaks then IMO they must be removed ASAP. This is one case where we can remove the invader and should. But can oaks not carry the diseases as well? Angus Macmillan www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org www.con-servation.org.uk All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What evidence is there for this?
wrote , "Bob Hobden" wrote: wrote What evidence is there for this? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/365...ust-warns.html Or is it the National Trust just scaremongering to get rid of plants it dislikes? If oaks have the disease should they not be culled? Oaks are very much a British native and Rhododendron ponticum isn't. It does invade woodland and stops any undergrowth as light is excluded from the ground permanently, they being evergreens. Even forest fire does not kill them completely as they come back from the roots, seen that myself. For that reason alone they should be removed but when you add in the fact that they incubate/carry the dreaded disease that potentially will decimate our oaks then IMO they must be removed ASAP. This is one case where we can remove the invader and should. But can oaks not carry the diseases as well? My understanding is that the disease is made worse because Rhodos are evergreen. -- Regards Bob Hobden |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What evidence is there for this?
On Dec 8, 10:23*pm, wrote:
What evidence is there for this? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/365...should-be-cull... Or is it the National Trust just scaremongering to get rid of plants it dislikes? If oaks have the disease should they not be culled? Angus Macmillanwww.roots-of-blood.org.ukwww.killhunting.orgwww.con-servation.org.uk All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) Rhododendron ponticum is a disaster even with these fungal diseases. Here is what I replied to one of your threads 2 years ago: On a global scale, whether we worry about any of those three species Globally absolutely but locally Rhododendron ponticum is a disaster in Ireland. We have bugger all in terms of unique habitat or species. One of the few things we have that is spectacular is the Oak woods of SW Ireland. These are sopping wet and do not get much frost and are loaded with (locally restricted) mosses and liverworts and ferns. In terms of species, very few (in any?) are endemic but it is a spectacular habitat in beautiful countryside and is now restricted to a few valleys having once covered the entire region. You also get Kerry spottted slugs and St Patricks Cabbage and yew and arbutus woodland. Once rhodos move in you get zilch apart from the rhodos themselves. It is sad and it is right to try to control them. Sycamores are not as bad and deer are certainly a problem as are sheep (in some areas). Globally it is a blip but locally it is maybe the most important habitat in Ireland. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What evidence is there for this?
In message ,
writes What evidence is there for this? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/365...uld-be-culled- to-save-UK-gardens-National-Trust-warns.html Having spent many hours with a group of conservation volunteers hacking out rhododendrons in a country park, I can answer this troll with relish. They produce a dead zone, and the ground takes years to recover, according to the park wardens. They make a great bonfire though, it's a good winter job! -- Gordon H Remove "invalid" to reply |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What evidence is there for this?
On Dec 9, 3:40*pm, Janet Baraclough
wrote: SNIP The NTS also operates plant biosecurity measures. AIUI *the disease spreads by spores on the wind , water droplets, or infected *leaves and root fragments carried on human and animal *feet so you can imagine why it hasn't been possible to contain it, *on a rainy windy site which was walked on by hundreds of people and local wildlife. The public is now excluded from known *infected areas but the disease is being detected in a widening radius. http://www.nts.org.uk/Property/13/Ne...perty/13/News/ * *The latest discovery of phytophthera kernoviae in native bilberry and oaks in local woods *has caused great anxiety, First, that both species are significant *in the Scottish *wildlife foodchain ; but even worse, that pk might affect common *ericaceous plants such as native heather. * The NTS is only the canary warning the miners of the unseen danger . The disease must also be in other local *wild woodland and in private gardens; the initial symptoms are not very easy for an untrained eye to notice or identify. * Janet. (Arran). I feel ill reading this. I never properly recovered from Dutch Elm disease (mental scarring; not dead limbs). Des |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What evidence is there for this?
In article 504df0d3-30c3-4651-8277-
, says... On Dec 9, 3:40*pm, Janet Baraclough wrote: SNIP The NTS also operates plant biosecurity measures. AIUI *the disease spreads by spores on the wind , water droplets, or infected *leaves and root fragments carried on human and animal *feet so you can imagine why it hasn't been possible to contain it, *on a rainy windy site which was walked on by hundreds of people and local wildlife. The public is now excluded from known *infected areas but the disease is being detected in a widening radius. http://www.nts.org.uk/Property/13/Ne...perty/13/News/ * *The latest discovery of phytophthera kernoviae in native bilberry and oaks in local woods *has caused great anxiety, First, that both species are significant *in the Scottish *wildlife foodchain ; but even worse, that pk might affect common *ericaceous plants such as native heather.. * The NTS is only the canary warning the miners of the unseen danger .. The disease must also be in other local *wild woodland and in private gardens; the initial symptoms are not very easy for an untrained eye to notice or identify. * Janet. (Arran). I feel ill reading this. I never properly recovered from Dutch Elm disease (mental scarring; not dead limbs). Des The real problem is that although the goverment got going with the inspections pretty soon, it does no good as especially the large private gardens and woodland just do not have the funds to do anything much about it, without grants for labour it is just taking too long to clear the understory with the very small work forces that are imployed these days, sadly there are now no water course in cornwall that do not test positive for the spores. So if any of you reading this have woodland get clearing now before its too late. If you can increase the flow of air and the light levels, experiance suggests that the healthy trees seem to be able to resist the infection -- Charlie Pridham, Gardening in Cornwall www.roselandhouse.co.uk Holders of national collections of Clematis viticella cultivars and Lapageria rosea |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What evidence is there for this?
In article ,
lid says... On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:44:54 -0000, Charlie Pridham wrote: In article 504df0d3-30c3-4651-8277- , says... On Dec 9, 3:40*pm, Janet Baraclough wrote: SNIP The NTS also operates plant biosecurity measures. AIUI *the disease spreads by spores on the wind , water droplets, or infected *leaves and root fragments carried on human and animal *feet so you can imagine why it hasn't been possible to contain it, *on a rainy windy site which was walked on by hundreds of people and local wildlife. The public is now excluded from known *infected areas but the disease is being detected in a widening radius. http://www.nts.org.uk/Property/13/Ne...perty/13/News/ * *The latest discovery of phytophthera kernoviae in native bilberry and oaks in local woods *has caused great anxiety, First, that both species are significant *in the Scottish *wildlife foodchain ; but even worse, that pk might affect common *ericaceous plants such as native heather. * The NTS is only the canary warning the miners of the unseen danger . The disease must also be in other local *wild woodland and in private gardens; the initial symptoms are not very easy for an untrained eye to notice or identify. * Janet. (Arran). I feel ill reading this. I never properly recovered from Dutch Elm disease (mental scarring; not dead limbs). Des The real problem is that although the goverment got going with the inspections pretty soon, it does no good as especially the large private gardens and woodland just do not have the funds to do anything much about it, without grants for labour it is just taking too long to clear the understory with the very small work forces that are imployed these days, sadly there are now no water course in cornwall that do not test positive for the spores. So if any of you reading this have woodland get clearing now before its too late. If you can increase the flow of air and the light levels, experiance suggests that the healthy trees seem to be able to resist the infection Clearing rhododendrons isn't going to do Exbury Gardens a lot of good. http://www.exbury.co.uk/exbury/index.htm Where the plants are as yet unaffected improvements can still be made to the planting and if you go to some of Cornwall s big gardens you will see daylight under the plants now as they have brought them off the ground by removing lower branches, they are also allowed to micro prop from infected material - clean it up, grow it on and replant later after the area has been cleared, but right now its a huge problem. -- Charlie Pridham, Gardening in Cornwall www.roselandhouse.co.uk Holders of national collections of Clematis viticella cultivars and Lapageria rosea |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Chung's insanity: Objective and verifiable evidence. | Gardening | |||
Global warming? "Evidence" from my garden? | United Kingdom | |||
Recent Evidence Confirms Risks of Horizontal Gene Transfer | sci.agriculture |