Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ge...green-agendas/
January 6th, 2010 Gerald Warner: Wow! That Copenhagen package really worked. Global warming has been dramatically reversed. In fact, if Al Gore could see his way to turning the heat back up just a little, most of us would be deeply appreciative… “Climate science” is the oxymoron of the century. There is not a city, town or hamlet in the country that has had its weather conditions correctly forecast, over periods as short as 12 hours, during the past week. This is the “exceptionally mild winter” that the climate change buffoons warned us would occur as a consequence of global warming. Their credibility is 20 degrees below zero. Yet nothing shames them, nothing persuades them to come out of the bunker with their hands high and “fess up”. Patronisingly fobbing off the public with fabricated excuses has become second nature to them. Latterly they have been concocting alibis about the Gulf Stream to explain Britain’s Arctic conditions. Uh-huh? Is it the Gulf Stream that has frozen the Vistula and given Poland a temperature of –25C? Is it the Gulf Stream that has caused the worst blizzards in Beijing since 1951? The entire Northern Hemisphere is frozen. The world looks like a Christmas pudding with icing on the top. That is completely normal, part of the random climate fluctuations with which our ancestors were familiar. Yet fraudulent scientists have gained millions of pounds by taking selective samples of natural climate change, whipping up a Grande Peur and using it to advance the cause of world government, state control and fiscal despoliation of citizens. 2010 should be the year when all that ends. It is time for Zero Tolerance of AGW fraudsters and their political masters. It is time to say: Green taxes? We won’t pay them. Nor will we vote for or permit to remain in office any politician or party that supports the AGW fraud. This year is one of those rare occasions when we have an opportunity to punish and control our political masters – provided Britons have the will to break with the two-party system. Due to the rise of smaller parties – itself the consequence of the misgovernment of the Lab/Lib/Con consensus – it is a buyer’s market. The rule of thumb should be: any party that supports the global warming scam is ineligible for our votes. It doesn’t matter how ingrained one’s loyalty may once have been to one of the “major” parties, the time has come to impose the popular will on politicians who have learned, since the abolition of capital punishment in 1965, that by forming an anti-democratic consensus they can dictate to the public. The coming general election is going to be an intelligence test. If people realise that voting for the slightly less objectionable choice gets them nowhere, that by holding out for what they really want they can actually obtain it, then we may be able to liberate ourselves from the tree-hugging New/Blue Labour consensus. If we fail to rise to that challenge we shall forfeit the right to complain about five more years of PC oppression. That is the answer: Zero Tolerance of “Green” agendas. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
Dead Paul wrote:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ge...green-agendas/ January 6th, 2010 Gerald Warner: Wow! That Copenhagen package really worked. Global warming has been dramatically reversed. In fact, if Al Gore could see his way to turning the heat back up just a little, most of us would be deeply appreciative… “Climate science” is the oxymoron of the century. There is not a city, town or hamlet in the country that has had its weather conditions correctly forecast, over periods as short as 12 hours, during the past week. This is the “exceptionally mild winter” that the climate change buffoons warned us would occur as a consequence of global warming. Their credibility is 20 degrees below zero. Yet nothing shames them, nothing persuades them to come out of the bunker with their hands high and “fess up”. Patronisingly fobbing off the public with fabricated excuses has become second nature to them. Latterly they have been concocting alibis about the Gulf Stream to explain Britain’s Arctic conditions. Uh-huh? Is it the Gulf Stream that has frozen the Vistula and given Poland a temperature of –25C? Is it the Gulf Stream that has caused the worst blizzards in Beijing since 1951? The entire Northern Hemisphere is frozen. The world looks like a Christmas pudding with icing on the top. That is completely normal, part of the random climate fluctuations with which our ancestors were familiar. Yet fraudulent scientists have gained millions of pounds by taking selective samples of natural climate change, whipping up a Grande Peur and using it to advance the cause of world government, state control and fiscal despoliation of citizens. 2010 should be the year when all that ends. It is time for Zero Tolerance of AGW fraudsters and their political masters. It is time to say: Green taxes? We won’t pay them. Nor will we vote for or permit to remain in office any politician or party that supports the AGW fraud. This year is one of those rare occasions when we have an opportunity to punish and control our political masters – provided Britons have the will to break with the two-party system. Due to the rise of smaller parties – itself the consequence of the misgovernment of the Lab/Lib/Con consensus – it is a buyer’s market. The rule of thumb should be: any party that supports the global warming scam is ineligible for our votes. It doesn’t matter how ingrained one’s loyalty may once have been to one of the “major” parties, the time has come to impose the popular will on politicians who have learned, since the abolition of capital punishment in 1965, that by forming an anti-democratic consensus they can dictate to the public. The coming general election is going to be an intelligence test. If people realise that voting for the slightly less objectionable choice gets them nowhere, that by holding out for what they really want they can actually obtain it, then we may be able to liberate ourselves from the tree-hugging New/Blue Labour consensus. If we fail to rise to that challenge we shall forfeit the right to complain about five more years of PC oppression. That is the answer: Zero Tolerance of “Green” agendas. Very refreshing to finally read this in the mainstream media. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
"Dead Paul" wrote in message ... http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ge...green-agendas/ January 6th, 2010 Gerald Warner: Wow! That Copenhagen package really worked. Global warming has been dramatically reversed. In fact, if Al Gore could see his way to turning the heat back up just a little, most of us would be deeply appreciative… “Climate science” is the oxymoron of the century. There is not a city, town or hamlet in the country that has had its weather conditions correctly forecast, over periods as short as 12 hours, during the past week. This is the “exceptionally mild winter” that the climate change buffoons warned us would occur as a consequence of global warming. Their credibility is 20 degrees below zero. BBC Radio 4 news was pressed into service earlier today to explain the conundrum to increasingly sceptical plebs. The 6pm bulletin went to some lengths to explain that what we are now experiencing is 'weather' - but that the grave problem of 'climate' still remains Here's sobering link to the plight of Peruvian Indians - who are suffering badly from increasingly long and bitter winters. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010...rs-winter-cold The suffering of their children is airily ascribed to the Indian's own 'micro climate', which has produced freezing temperatures in a rapidly warming world. I can foresee 'microclimate' becoming the explanation of choice when the Warmist's are confronted by growing evidence that things are getting colder, not hotter. This snow, for example, is just down to the UK's microclimate..... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:25:37 +0000, Dead Paul wrote:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ge...green-agendas/ January 6th, 2010 Gerald Warner: Wow! That Copenhagen package really worked. Global warming has been dramatically reversed. In fact, if Al Gore could see his way to turning the heat back up just a little, most of us would be deeply appreciative… “Climate science” is the oxymoron of the century. There is not a city, town or hamlet in the country that has had its weather conditions correctly forecast, over periods as short as 12 hours, during the past week. Meh, all this does is reaffirm the old saying that Britain has weather, not climate. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
Dead Paul wrote:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ge...green-agendas/ Fred wrote: Very refreshing to finally read this in the mainstream media. Yeah, that's about what I would expect from "the mainstream media", and the Telegraph in particular: don't know the difference between climate and weather. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
On 8 Jan, 02:16, abelard wrote:
here's my own background page on the dendroclimatology....http://www.abelard.org/briefings/dendroclimatogy.php but i'll just work to understand enough to be able to assess the * * *factor analysis... Once again a valueless link I'm afraid. Messy, almost unreadable page which contains no reference to source. whatever it is, it ain't science. Don't give up the day job! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
On 7 Jan, 21:55, Fred wrote:
Dead Paul wrote: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ge...6/climate-scie... January 6th, 2010 Gerald Warner: Wow! That Copenhagen package really worked. Global warming has been dramatically reversed. In fact, if Al Gore could see his way to turning the heat back up just a little, most of us would be deeply appreciative Climate science is the oxymoron of the century. There is not a city, town or hamlet in the country that has had its weather conditions correctly forecast, over periods as short as 12 hours, during the past week. This is the exceptionally mild winter that the climate change buffoons warned us would occur as a consequence of global warming. Their credibility is 20 degrees below zero. Yet nothing shames them, nothing persuades them to come out of the bunker with their hands high and fess up. Patronisingly fobbing off the public with fabricated excuses has become second nature to them. Latterly they have been concocting alibis about the Gulf Stream to explain Britains Arctic conditions. Uh-huh? Is it the Gulf Stream that has frozen the Vistula and given Poland a temperature of 25C? Is it the Gulf Stream that has caused the worst blizzards in Beijing since 1951? The entire Northern Hemisphere is frozen. The world looks like a Christmas pudding with icing on the top. That is completely normal, part of the random climate fluctuations with which our ancestors were familiar. Yet fraudulent scientists have gained millions of pounds by taking selective samples of natural climate change, whipping up a Grande Peur and using it to advance the cause of world government, state control and fiscal despoliation of citizens. 2010 should be the year when all that ends. It is time for Zero Tolerance of AGW fraudsters and their political masters. It is time to say: Green taxes? We wont pay them. Nor will we vote for or permit to remain in office any politician or party that supports the AGW fraud. This year is one of those rare occasions when we have an opportunity to punish and control our political masters provided Britons have the will to break with the two-party system. Due to the rise of smaller parties itself the consequence of the misgovernment of the Lab/Lib/Con consensus it is a buyers market.. The rule of thumb should be: any party that supports the global warming scam is ineligible for our votes. It doesnt matter how ingrained ones loyalty may once have been to one of the major parties, the time has come to impose the popular will on politicians who have learned, since the abolition of capital punishment in 1965, that by forming an anti-democratic consensus they can dictate to the public. The coming general election is going to be an intelligence test. If people realise that voting for the slightly less objectionable choice gets them nowhere, that by holding out for what they really want they can actually obtain it, then we may be able to liberate ourselves from the tree-hugging New/Blue Labour consensus. If we fail to rise to that challenge we shall forfeit the right to complain about five more years of PC oppression. That is the answer: Zero Tolerance of Green agendas. Very refreshing to finally read this in the mainstream media. Yes you can carry on with your polluting now with a clear conscience, until the next warm spell. BTW, check this out, particularly the maps. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8447262.stm Doug. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
abelard wrote: i'm not greatly interested in 'weather'.... and it's running me into stuff like the amo i've just put this by to read 'soon' :- http://oceanworld.tamu.edu/resources...nddrought.html That relates to weather effects as the oscillation frequency is too high for 30-year climate effects. "Arctic Oscillation Sometimes called the northern hemisphere annular mode, this is the year-to-year variability pf weather patterns at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere" "The two phases of the Arctic Oscillation: Left– Warm Phase; Right– Cold Phase. Notice that storms come ashore in Europe at different latitudes in the two phases. This strongly influences European weather, especially in winter. " (Graph): The Pacific Decadal Oscillation is related to weather over north America "Positive PDO values are usually associated with wetter conditions in the Southwestern United States, while negative PDO values are suggestive of persistent drought in the Southwest." The word 'climate' desn't appear 'til near the end, and then it's in an oblique reference to something else. here's my own background page on the dendroclimatology.... http://www.abelard.org/briefings/dendroclimatogy.php but i'll just work to understand enough to be able to assess the factor analysis... One shudders to think what primary colours it might be written in. -- from Kim Bolton |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
On 8 Jan, 09:08, Kim Bolton wrote:
abelard wrote: i'm not greatly interested in 'weather'.... and it's running me into stuff like the amo i've just put this by to read 'soon' :- http://oceanworld.tamu.edu/resources...oceananddrough... That relates to weather effects as the oscillation frequency is too high for 30-year climate effects. "Arctic Oscillation Sometimes called the northern hemisphere annular mode, this is the year-to-year variability pf weather patterns at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere" "The two phases of the Arctic Oscillation: Left Warm Phase; Right Cold Phase. Notice that storms come ashore in Europe at different latitudes in the two phases. This strongly influences European weather, especially in winter. " (Graph): The Pacific Decadal Oscillation is related to weather over north America "Positive PDO values are usually associated with wetter conditions in the Southwestern United States, while negative PDO values are suggestive of persistent drought in the Southwest." The word 'climate' desn't appear 'til near the end, and then it's in an oblique reference to something else. here's my own background page on the dendroclimatology.... http://www.abelard.org/briefings/dendroclimatogy.php but i'll just work to understand enough to be able to assess the * * factor analysis... One shudders to think what primary colours it might be written in. -- from Kim Bolton Did anybody see this? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...cs/8443687.stm "John Hirst, head of the Met Office, defends the record of the weathermen after they predicted a mild winter. Andrew Neil asked him to justify his salary which is higher than the prime minister's." Oh how he wriggles.... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
Dead Paul wrote:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ge...green-agendas/ January 6th, 2010 Gerald Warner: Wow! That Copenhagen package really worked. Global warming has been dramatically reversed. In fact, if Al Gore could see his way to turning the heat back up just a little, most of us would be deeply appreciative… “Climate science” is the oxymoron of the century. There is not a city, town or hamlet in the country that has had its weather conditions correctly forecast, over periods as short as 12 hours, during the past week. This is the “exceptionally mild winter” that the climate change buffoons warned us would occur as a consequence of global warming. Their credibility is 20 degrees below zero. Another drooling right wing nut who cannot tell the difference between weather and climate spouting off in the Torygraph. I guess the Telegraph knows their target market of senile halfwits only too well. The weather at the moment is roughly what we should have at this latitude were it not for the warming influence of the Altantic and Gulf Stream and our normal prevailing SW wind pattern. Global warming means the *global* average gets higher. It does not mean that everywhere gets slightly warmer by the same amount. We could very well be losers. UK climate is abnormally warm for its high latitude. Were it not for the UK maritime influence on climate Birmingham and Manchester would expect to have weather like Edmonton in Canada which is at a roughly similar latitude. And that is basically what we end up with when the wind blows directly off the cold NE continental land mass. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmonton Most gardeners are already well aware of climate change, at least if they keep records of when things come into flower. Regards, Martin Brown |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
"broadssailor" wrote in message ... On 8 Jan, 09:08, Kim Bolton wrote: abelard wrote: i'm not greatly interested in 'weather'.... and it's running me into stuff like the amo i've just put this by to read 'soon' :- http://oceanworld.tamu.edu/resources...oceananddrough... That relates to weather effects as the oscillation frequency is too high for 30-year climate effects. "Arctic Oscillation Sometimes called the northern hemisphere annular mode, this is the year-to-year variability pf weather patterns at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere" "The two phases of the Arctic Oscillation: Left Warm Phase; Right Cold Phase. Notice that storms come ashore in Europe at different latitudes in the two phases. This strongly influences European weather, especially in winter. " (Graph): The Pacific Decadal Oscillation is related to weather over north America "Positive PDO values are usually associated with wetter conditions in the Southwestern United States, while negative PDO values are suggestive of persistent drought in the Southwest." The word 'climate' desn't appear 'til near the end, and then it's in an oblique reference to something else. here's my own background page on the dendroclimatology.... http://www.abelard.org/briefings/dendroclimatogy.php but i'll just work to understand enough to be able to assess the factor analysis... One shudders to think what primary colours it might be written in. -- from Kim Bolton Did anybody see this? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...cs/8443687.stm "John Hirst, head of the Met Office, defends the record of the weathermen after they predicted a mild winter. Andrew Neil asked him to justify his salary which is higher than the prime minister's." That would be the same prime minister who as chancellor, told us that the current bust couldn't happen because he was so shit hot, and told us as PM that we were better placed to recover from it when it happened, and that we would come out of recession before other countries, again because he was so wonderful, yes? Steve |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 02:14:45 -0800 (PST), broadssailor wrote:
On 8 Jan, 09:08, Kim Bolton wrote: abelard wrote: i'm not greatly interested in 'weather'.... and it's running me into stuff like the amo i've just put this by to read 'soon' :- http://oceanworld.tamu.edu/resources...oceananddrough... That relates to weather effects as the oscillation frequency is too high for 30-year climate effects. "Arctic Oscillation Sometimes called the northern hemisphere annular mode, this is the year-to-year variability pf weather patterns at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere" "The two phases of the Arctic Oscillation: Left– Warm Phase; Right– Cold Phase. Notice that storms come ashore in Europe at different latitudes in the two phases. This strongly influences European weather, especially in winter. " (Graph): The Pacific Decadal Oscillation is related to weather over north America "Positive PDO values are usually associated with wetter conditions in the Southwestern United States, while negative PDO values are suggestive of persistent drought in the Southwest." The word 'climate' desn't appear 'til near the end, and then it's in an oblique reference to something else. here's my own background page on the dendroclimatology.... http://www.abelard.org/briefings/dendroclimatogy.php but i'll just work to understand enough to be able to assess the * * factor analysis... One shudders to think what primary colours it might be written in. -- from Kim Bolton Did anybody see this? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...cs/8443687.stm "John Hirst, head of the Met Office, defends the record of the weathermen after they predicted a mild winter. Andrew Neil asked him to justify his salary which is higher than the prime minister's." Oh how he wriggles.... Hardly surprising: he's merely a manager, not a forecaster. I would expect his bonus was paid after he met (or exceeded) soem management targets, such as cost savings, delivering some major projects or the like. Not how good his employees were at guessing what sort of weather we were going to get - everyone knows that any forecast for more than 3 days ahead is pretty close to random chance, and always will be. This sounds like a cheap shot. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
On Jan 8, 11:14*am, broadssailor wrote:
On 8 Jan, 09:08, Kim Bolton wrote: abelard wrote: i'm not greatly interested in 'weather'.... and it's running me into stuff like the amo i've just put this by to read 'soon' :- http://oceanworld.tamu.edu/resources...oceananddrough.... That relates to weather effects as the oscillation frequency is too high for 30-year climate effects. "Arctic Oscillation Sometimes called the northern hemisphere annular mode, this is the year-to-year variability pf weather patterns at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere" "The two phases of the Arctic Oscillation: Left Warm Phase; Right Cold Phase. Notice that storms come ashore in Europe at different latitudes in the two phases. This strongly influences European weather, especially in winter. " (Graph): The Pacific Decadal Oscillation is related to weather over north America "Positive PDO values are usually associated with wetter conditions in the Southwestern United States, while negative PDO values are suggestive of persistent drought in the Southwest." The word 'climate' desn't appear 'til near the end, and then it's in an oblique reference to something else. here's my own background page on the dendroclimatology.... http://www.abelard.org/briefings/dendroclimatogy.php but i'll just work to understand enough to be able to assess the * * factor analysis... One shudders to think what primary colours it might be written in. -- from Kim Bolton Did anybody see this?http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...cs/8443687.stm "John Hirst, head of the Met Office, defends the record of the weathermen after they predicted a mild winter. Andrew Neil asked him to justify his salary which is higher than the prime minister's." Oh how he wriggles.... You can see how dry his throat was. :-) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
"broadssailor" wrote in message ... Did anybody see this? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...cs/8443687.stm Yes I did. "John Hirst, head of the Met Office, defends the record of the weathermen after they predicted a mild winter. Andrew Neil asked him to justify his salary which is higher than the prime minister's." Oh how he wriggles.... ....and made himself look a right pratt!!! -- -- https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Met office lies
"pete" wrote in message ... Hardly surprising: he's merely a manager, not a forecaster. I would expect his bonus was paid after he met (or exceeded) soem management targets, such as cost savings, delivering some major projects or the like. Not how good his employees were at guessing what sort of weather we were going to get - everyone knows that any forecast for more than 3 days ahead is pretty close to random chance, and always will be. This sounds like a cheap shot. Then they ought not send in a 'mere' manager to present a forecaster's pov. -- -- https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
has the Met office lost the plot? | United Kingdom | |||
Orchid Festival - Guess who I met? | Orchid Photos | |||
"He met with terrorists? Oh, that's good." | Gardening | |||
lies about WMD, lies about the greenhouse effect | sci.agriculture |