"Roy Bailey" wrote in message
...
In article , 'Mike'
writes
No it's not a diseased tree, belongs to the council on council land and
needs to come out of it on health and safety to life, property and limb
grounds.

Ah, the usual excuse to get rid of an inconvenient tree.
--
Roy Bailey
West Berkshire.


Not ""Inconvenient"" at all, just dangerous to the extent that if/when it
falls, it falls across a house. The owner has stated that he is more than
willing to replace it with more suitable trees. In fact he has suggested
more suitable ones to be planted AT HIS EXPENSE, note that AT HIS EXPENSE,
if said tree is felled.

Might I respectfully suggest that before you open your very biased mouth,
you do a little research or even ask a few questions into the matter?

In your blind one sided 'tree huggers' view, you failed to notice that
elsewhere in the thread, I reported that a "perfectly healthy tree', as
reported by the Council, fell a couple of years later demolishing part of a
barn, but you wouldn't wish to know that would you? Goes against your tree
hugger's outlook.

A tip. ""Engage brain before engaging fingers on a keyboard on a matter you
know sod all about""

Kindest possible regards

Mike


--
Base for a Botanic visit to the Isle of Wight?
www.shanklinmanormews.co.uk

On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:17:16 -0000, "'Mike'"
wrote:


The owner has stated that he is more than
willing to replace it with more suitable trees. In fact he has suggested
more suitable ones to be planted AT HIS EXPENSE, note that AT HIS EXPENSE,
if said tree is felled.

But earlier you said:

No it's not a diseased tree, belongs to the council on council land and
needs to come out of it on health and safety to life, property and limb
grounds.

So which of your statements was the lie?

"Qwight" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:17:16 -0000, "'Mike'"
wrote:


The owner has stated that he is more than
willing to replace it with more suitable trees. In fact he has suggested
more suitable ones to be planted AT HIS EXPENSE, note that AT HIS EXPENSE,
if said tree is felled.

But earlier you said:

No it's not a diseased tree, belongs to the council on council land and
needs to come out of it on health and safety to life, property and limb
grounds.

So which of your statements was the lie?

What teh F*** are you telking about?

Replacing a tree does not make the new one a health and safety problem!

Alan

"alan.holmes" wrote in message
...

"Qwight" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:17:16 -0000, "'Mike'"
wrote:


The owner has stated that he is more than
willing to replace it with more suitable trees. In fact he has suggested
more suitable ones to be planted AT HIS EXPENSE, note that AT HIS
EXPENSE,
if said tree is felled.

But earlier you said:

No it's not a diseased tree, belongs to the council on council land and
needs to come out of it on health and safety to life, property and limb
grounds.

So which of your statements was the lie?

What teh F*** are you telking about?

Probably the fact that one statement refers to the council owning the tree,
and the other gives the impression of a single individual owner.

Replacing a tree does not make the new one a health and safety problem!

I don't know - it might be replaced with a lupin.

--
Kathy

"alan.holmes" wrote in message
...

"Qwight" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:17:16 -0000, "'Mike'"
wrote:


The owner has stated that he is more than
willing to replace it with more suitable trees. In fact he has suggested
more suitable ones to be planted AT HIS EXPENSE, note that AT HIS
EXPENSE,
if said tree is felled.

But earlier you said:

No it's not a diseased tree, belongs to the council on council land and
needs to come out of it on health and safety to life, property and limb
grounds.

So which of your statements was the lie?

What teh F*** are you telking about?

Replacing a tree does not make the new one a health and safety problem!

Alan


Correct thank you.

The present tree which is becoming a danger to life, limb and property over
the ensuing years is a huge Horse Chestnut which has already been pollarded
but has grown again, as of course it would. The owner had a professional
report on this, and another tree, some 3 years ago and the HC was then
recommended for removal and replaced planting taking place. It has been
recommended that Silver Birches, further away from the HC, and possibly
underplanted where it goes alongside a public path are planted and the owner
is quite prepared to pay for this. A picture of how it would look, taken
from a copy of a photo of Silver Birches taken from Gertrude Jekyll's
garden at Munstead Wood, in 'Making Gardens' by Erica Hunningher had already
been sent to the council.

I hope that puts the picture straight for any tree huggers out there who
don't know what they are talking about but just jump on the band wagon.

Mike

"Qwight" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:17:16 -0000, "'Mike'"
wrote:


The owner has stated that he is more than
willing to replace it with more suitable trees. In fact he has suggested
more suitable ones to be planted AT HIS EXPENSE, note that AT HIS EXPENSE,
if said tree is felled.

But earlier you said:

No it's not a diseased tree, belongs to the council on council land and
needs to come out of it on health and safety to life, property and limb
grounds.

So which of your statements was the lie?



Neither



--
Base for a Botanic visit to the Isle of Wight?
www.shanklinmanormews.co.uk

"Anne Welsh Jackson" wrote in message
...
Qwight wrote:

On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:17:16 -0000, "'Mike'"
wrote:

The owner has stated that he is more than willing to replace it
with more suitable trees. In fact he has suggested more suitable
ones to be planted AT HIS EXPENSE, note that AT HIS EXPENSE,
if said tree is felled.

But earlier you said:

No it's not a diseased tree, belongs to the council on council land and
needs to come out of it on health and safety to life, property and limb
grounds.

So which of your statements was the lie?

Probably both. He makes things up as he goes along...

--
AnneJ

Anne, NEVER ever judge people by your own standards. By the looks of things
if your example of posting is anything to go on, their standards are far
above yours. Mine certainly are.

Kindest possible regards

Mike


--
Base for a Botanic visit to the Isle of Wight?
www.shanklinmanormews.co.uk