Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cuttings
Watching cuttings being taken on GW last night, and hearing the usual
advice to "cut the last pair of leaves in half if they are too big" for the umpteenth time over many years made me think. Why not simply cut one leaf off through its stalk rather than cut two leaves in half? It would be a lot simpler, as other leaves lower down would already have been removed in that fashion. Surely it would also reduce stress for the cutting as it would lead to less water loss, and give the advantage that a much smaller cut area would be far less prone to suffer from fungal infections. -- Jeff |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Cuttings
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:50:01 +0100, Jeff Layman
wrote: Watching cuttings being taken on GW last night, and hearing the usual advice to "cut the last pair of leaves in half if they are too big" for the umpteenth time over many years made me think. Why not simply cut one leaf off through its stalk rather than cut two leaves in half? It would be a lot simpler, as other leaves lower down would already have been removed in that fashion. Surely it would also reduce stress for the cutting as it would lead to less water loss, and give the advantage that a much smaller cut area would be far less prone to suffer from fungal infections. Jeff, we'll await the results of your experiments! Pam in Bristol |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Cuttings
"Jeff Layman" wrote Watching cuttings being taken on GW last night, and hearing the usual advice to "cut the last pair of leaves in half if they are too big" for the umpteenth time over many years made me think. Why not simply cut one leaf off through its stalk rather than cut two leaves in half? It would be a lot simpler, as other leaves lower down would already have been removed in that fashion. Surely it would also reduce stress for the cutting as it would lead to less water loss, and give the advantage that a much smaller cut area would be far less prone to suffer from fungal infections. --------------------------- I've never cut a leaf of a cutting in half, they either stay or are removed. -- Regards Bob Hobden W.of London. UK |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Cuttings
"Jeff Layman" wrote in message ... Watching cuttings being taken on GW last night, and hearing the usual advice to "cut the last pair of leaves in half if they are too big" for the umpteenth time over many years made me think. Why not simply cut one leaf off through its stalk rather than cut two leaves in half? It would be a lot simpler, as other leaves lower down would already have been removed in that fashion. Surely it would also reduce stress for the cutting as it would lead to less water loss, and give the advantage that a much smaller cut area would be far less prone to suffer from fungal infections. -- Jeff In my experience it makes little difference to the strike rate, but cutting the leaves in half makes handling and placing the cuttings easier if you are doing a lot, so its like many bits of information on propagation - skewed to the way a nurseryman would do it, another classic is "take internodal cuttings" in fact they root just as well nodally as internodally but the nurseryman will always favour internodal because you get twice as many cuttings :~) -- Charlie, Gardening in Cornwall Holders of National Collections of Clematis viticella and Lapageria rosea cvs http://www.roselandhouse.co.uk |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Cuttings
"Martin" wrote ... "Bob Hobden"wrote: "Jeff Layman" wrote Watching cuttings being taken on GW last night, and hearing the usual advice to "cut the last pair of leaves in half if they are too big" for the umpteenth time over many years made me think. Why not simply cut one leaf off through its stalk rather than cut two leaves in half? It would be a lot simpler, as other leaves lower down would already have been removed in that fashion. Surely it would also reduce stress for the cutting as it would lead to less water loss, and give the advantage that a much smaller cut area would be far less prone to suffer from fungal infections. --------------------------- I've never cut a leaf of a cutting in half, they either stay or are removed. Also counting six rather than five or seven when pruning wisteria. Based on scientific fact or pure whimsy? ---------------------------------- I never count, just do it by eye/feel. I do, however, prune back to 2 or 3 buds in the winter. -- Regards Bob Hobden W.of London. UK |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Cuttings
On 30/07/2011 22:47, Pam Moore wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:50:01 +0100, Jeff Layman wrote: Watching cuttings being taken on GW last night, and hearing the usual advice to "cut the last pair of leaves in half if they are too big" for the umpteenth time over many years made me think. Why not simply cut one leaf off through its stalk rather than cut two leaves in half? It would be a lot simpler, as other leaves lower down would already have been removed in that fashion. Surely it would also reduce stress for the cutting as it would lead to less water loss, and give the advantage that a much smaller cut area would be far less prone to suffer from fungal infections. Jeff, we'll await the results of your experiments! I only take cuttings of cacti and succulents. No leaves to worry about... ;-)) Well, not quite true. But I'm not very good at getting cuttings to root, and I was just intrigued by this advice. Next time I try I'll divide the cuttings into cut leaves and single leaves. Maybe others here can also try and report back their experience, although maybe Charlie P. has already answered the point. -- Jeff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rock elm cuttings no go, but sour cherry cuttings are going | Plant Science | |||
[IBC] Suckers as cuttings | Bonsai | |||
succulent cuttings | Gardening | |||
cactus cuttings | Gardening | |||
Cuttings, and trading roses | Roses |