Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Wild Garlic
In article , "Colin Davidson" writes: | | You are being forgetful. The excuse for the Act was conservation | grounds. If that had been a genuine reason, the law would have been | changed to address the main abuses and not to do other things as well. | | You really believe that the act was there as a conservation tool, and not | just a dumping ground for ideas to satisfy government spokesmen who could | say 'something is being done'? No and no. Obviously. | Then you should be supporting me in regarding that Act as anathema! | Its faults include precisely those of applying SINGLE-SIDED absolute | rules. | | That doesn't follow from my statement at all. Single sided? I've come across | land owners ruining habitats, but I've not come across one who uprooted a | wild plant en masse to plant elsewhere. Habitat protection is a different | (but very worthwhile) issue. You are now playing political word games. They don't do it PERSONALLY; they sell the rights. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Garlic - garlic.jpg | Garden Photos | |||
Supplier of Wild Garlic wanted ??? | United Kingdom | |||
Wild Garlic and back to bluebells non-scripta | United Kingdom | |||
Wild garlic | United Kingdom | |||
wild garlic/onion. | United Kingdom |