Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Wild Garlic
"Nick Maclaren" wrote in message ... | You really believe that the act was there as a conservation tool, and not | just a dumping ground for ideas to satisfy government spokesmen who could | say 'something is being done'? No and no. Obviously. Then perhaps your perception of this (and other related) legislation is merely differently negative to mine. You are now playing political word games. They don't do it PERSONALLY; they sell the rights. I'm doing nothing of the sort. Yes, land owners can indeed sell rights for removing wild plants from their land. And I'd argue that such things could, even should, be covered by law. Never stated otherwise. But that's rather different to whether any general member of the public should be allowed to do such on someone elses land; that's something that presents different dangers to wild species. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Garlic - garlic.jpg | Garden Photos | |||
Supplier of Wild Garlic wanted ??? | United Kingdom | |||
Wild Garlic and back to bluebells non-scripta | United Kingdom | |||
Wild garlic | United Kingdom | |||
wild garlic/onion. | United Kingdom |