Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16   Report Post  
Old 06-05-2004, 06:04 AM
Alan Gould
 
Posts: n/a
Default Soil improvement

In article , Kay Easton
writes

But isn't the 'recreational' implied by being part of the .rec
hierarchy?


Unless perhaps it implies 'recalcitrant'?
--
Alan & Joan Gould - North Lincs.
  #17   Report Post  
Old 06-05-2004, 11:05 AM
Jane Ransom
 
Posts: n/a
Default Soil improvement

In article , Kay Easton
writes
There is no reference to 'recreational' anything in our charter which
states:

But isn't the 'recreational' implied by being part of the .rec
hierarchy?


We want to include in our discussions the views of people such as market
gardeners etc as the information they have is invaluable. Their
gardening is not recreational!

So obviously we are in the wrong hierarchy (((((((((((
--
Jane Ransom in Lancaster.
I won't respond to private emails that are on topic for urg
but if you need to email me for any other reason, put ransoms
at jandg dot demon dot co dot uk where you see


  #18   Report Post  
Old 06-05-2004, 10:07 PM
Kay Easton
 
Posts: n/a
Default Soil improvement

In article , Jane Ransom
writes
In article , Kay Easton
writes
There is no reference to 'recreational' anything in our charter which
states:

But isn't the 'recreational' implied by being part of the .rec
hierarchy?


We want to include in our discussions the views of people such as market
gardeners etc as the information they have is invaluable. Their
gardening is not recreational!


No, but their advice is relevant to recreational gardening, so I think
we're OK on that one.

--
Kay Easton

Edward's earthworm page:
http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/edward/index.htm
  #19   Report Post  
Old 06-05-2004, 11:56 PM
Janet Baraclough..
 
Posts: n/a
Default Soil improvement

The message
from Alan Gould contains these words:

In article , Kay Easton
writes

But isn't the 'recreational' implied by being part of the .rec
hierarchy?


Unless perhaps it implies 'recalcitrant'?


Doh. Surely in the case of urg, it means recondite.

Yours deeply

Janet
  #20   Report Post  
Old 07-05-2004, 06:05 AM
Alan Gould
 
Posts: n/a
Default Soil improvement

In article , Janet Baraclough.
.. writes

Doh. Surely in the case of urg, it means recondite.

Reconditioned more likely in the case of some older hands. :-(
--
Alan & Joan Gould - North Lincs.


  #21   Report Post  
Old 07-05-2004, 06:05 AM
Alan Gould
 
Posts: n/a
Default Soil improvement

In article , Kay Easton
writes

No, but their advice is relevant to recreational gardening, so I think
we're OK on that one.

Does continual moving of goal posts count as soil improvement?
--
Alan & Joan Gould - North Lincs.
  #22   Report Post  
Old 07-05-2004, 11:03 AM
martin
 
Posts: n/a
Default Soil improvement

On Fri, 7 May 2004 05:44:58 +0100, Alan Gould
wrote:

In article , Kay Easton
writes

No, but their advice is relevant to recreational gardening, so I think
we're OK on that one.

Does continual moving of goal posts count as soil improvement?


On a football pitch? Yes

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Clay Soil Improvement / Organic Matter Types (London) nb- Gardening 6 26-05-2012 04:41 PM
Clay soil improvement Desmond Armstrong Lawns 10 31-03-2010 05:47 AM
Opinions, please, on soil improvement Natty Dread Gardening 5 09-04-2006 10:58 AM
Soil improvement-Worldwide? gary davis United Kingdom 18 13-05-2004 01:03 AM
Soil improvement Citizen Joe sci.agriculture 0 26-04-2003 12:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017